We performed a comparison between SmartBear TestLeft and Visual Studio Test Professional based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, OpenText, Perforce and others in Functional Testing Tools."The most valuable features are test executor and development."
"The solution is very stable; there's nothing in relation to stability to complain about."
"Visual Studio is the easiest to use."
"Visual Studio is highly powerful. It's probably the best software development tool on the market."
"The stability has always been very good."
"Code testing is the most valuable feature of this solution for developing software."
"The user interface is very friendly."
"Visual Studio Test Professional's most valuable feature is the rich IDE for doing code and test development."
"The initial setup is easy. It's easy to configure."
"TestLeft captures a lot of space in terms of memory, which is one issue that can be improved."
"The product must provide more automation."
"I would like to see more integration in the solution."
"Visual Studio Test Professional needs to improve its stability."
"The database administration could be better; you should be able to choose new tools with the development environment in Visual Studio. It could be easier to use."
"It is not good in terms of performance. When you open Visual Studio, you have to wait for a while to process your code. It uses a lot of resources and has a lot of features. If we could disable some of the features, it would be lighter and faster to use. Nowadays, for some of the projects, we use VS Code for JavaScript or Python. VS Code is very light and easy to use, whereas, in Visual Studio, we have to wait because it takes time to compile or run a project. It has a lot of competitors in terms of performance, such as Intelligent ID. Intelligent ID is very easy to use. It has many features, and it is lighter to use than Visual Studio. In terms of error handling, sometimes, it shows an error before you finish your code, which can be improved. It would be good if it has a version for Linux. I use VS Code on Linux, but I am not sure if Visual Studio has a version for Linux."
"There are too many features with the product and I would like there to be less."
"We would like to be able to easily integrate this solution with our continuous integration tools, such as Jenkins."
"It is hard to learn, and you need to invest time to understand it."
More Visual Studio Test Professional Pricing and Cost Advice →
Earn 20 points
SmartBear TestLeft is ranked 32nd in Functional Testing Tools while Visual Studio Test Professional is ranked 7th in Functional Testing Tools with 46 reviews. SmartBear TestLeft is rated 7.0, while Visual Studio Test Professional is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of SmartBear TestLeft writes "Simple to set up and the test execute feature is helpful, but the cost could be reduced". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Visual Studio Test Professional writes "Customization is a key feature as is the ability to integrate with third-party services ". SmartBear TestLeft is most compared with SmartBear TestComplete and Tricentis Tosca, whereas Visual Studio Test Professional is most compared with TFS, Apache JMeter, Tricentis NeoLoad, SmartBear TestComplete and OpenText UFT One.
See our list of best Functional Testing Tools vendors.
We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
