ODM's stability is fine now. We haven't had any issues lately, but it was a little unstable initially. We got it stabilized after a few hiccups.

ODM originally comes from the ILOG company. This product has been around for 35 years. It is the most robust, mature rule engine on the market. It is very stable.

In terms of stability, from time to time I get runtime errors for the deserialization issue for the XOM file. I get an error on the Rule Execution Server saying, "This XOM class cannot be deserialized. Please check if it is configured properly." I have to redeploy that part from my Rule Designer. That has happened twice over the course of the project. I think someone might have changed the XOM. Otherwise, it shouldn't have occurred. On the IBM site there is not too much written about the error.

UPDATE: Changed in configurations : Issue was later resolved. Stability is great.

I rate the solution's stability a ten out of ten.

I think it's stable, but if they could beef it up a little bit for bigger businesses, that'd be great, because we have so much in there. We have products that we have to split up because they are too big for it to handle sometimes. But that's just in development, within ODM. Again, processing has been fine, but I wish things were a little bit beefier.

The stability is good, because it's built based out of IBM WAS, WebSphere Application Server, which is a solid J2 platform that IBM has had forever. The platform is good. Its footprint is a little heavy. Other than that, the product works great.

No.

It is very stable.

The tools have good stability and performance.

ODM has probably been one of the more stable IBM products I have used.

ODM is very stable and has good uptime. 

Every software has small glitches, but generally it's a rock solid product. It's proven, and that's what it should do. 

It's 100 percent stable.

It does the job.