For most organizations, since they are already using Windows and other Microsoft services, implementing EMS from Microsoft is easy, and it seamlessly integrates with application troubleshooting and other functionalities. You already have everything you need, so you don't have to install an agent. It just pushes an extension automatically. Additionally, auto-pilot is a service that is not available with any other vendors. So, yeah, Microsoft is a good choice.

Overall, I would rate it an eight out of ten. 

Any organization with a good roadmap should go with Microsoft technologies. Microsoft has a big roadmap in place, without which even Ivanti can give it tough competition in the market. Microsoft is capable of providing the features its customers require. Planning is the key before using Microsoft Enterprise Mobility + Security.

Microsoft has entered into offering endpoint protection tools where it wants to eliminate the purpose of the endpoint firewall to some extent. For Microsoft to achieve the aforementioned goal, it should cover all the features, especially in the area of reporting, which is usually quite complex. You cannot simply get a glimpse with the tool in a single site, and you have to drill down here and there, so I think its control panel is also a bit complex.

I rate the overall tool a seven to eight out of ten.

Microsoft Enterprise Mobility + Security is good and easy to configure. You can find a lot of documentation on the implementation part. I would rate it a nine out of ten. 

We are considered a Microsoft partner as we are amongst a group that uses Microsoft Enterprise. It may not be a true partnership per se, however, we've been a customer for over 10 years.

We are level E3.

I'd advise potential new users to just become knowledgeable about all of the products within the platform, so that you do not purchase other items that you already have within Microsoft.

If you take the training before you roll out a large application like Microsoft, it's easier for your customers to understand how to use it.

I'd rate the solution at a nine out of ten.

I would rate the tool a nine out of ten. 

I rate the solution a seven out of ten. Its performance is average. If you have primary use cases, it provides a high standard of security. But for complex requirements, it could work better.

In general, I would give Microsoft Enterprise Mobility Security a nine out of ten.

It's actually just not one product, it's a combination of products. For example, there is Windows inside it. It's got editions of CCM, Office, etc. All are deployed with them. There's also no one particular version here. They are always evolving and updating.

The deployment we have is a hybrid kind of contract. However, we are mainly using on-premise deployment. We are currently trying out the could and we are still taking time to explore it. We're asking ourselves: what is the benefit we are going to get?

I would recommend other organizations go for E5 licenses rather than relying on E3 if they want better support services from Microsoft.

Overall, I'd rate the solution eight out of ten.

We have a business relationship with Microsoft.

I'd recommend that product, however, planning is the most important thing an organization can do to prep for implementation. It's a good idea to get someone with experience and who understands your needs to assist you at the beginning.

I'd rate the solution eight out of ten.

I would rate Microsoft Enterprise Mobility + Security at an eight out of ten.