OpenShift is very stable. I have 11 OpenShift clusters up and running for one customer, and the only issue I've had is with VMware. It's not with OpenShift itself, but with the layer underneath OpenShift.

I have found some minor issues related to pod networking in which some of the OpenShift pods were not performing well. To resolve that, I needed to do a reinstallation of the cluster. Apart from that, OpenShift is pretty stable.

OpenShift is really stable and works solidly as long as we do not make obvious mistakes. Any issues that we have encountered are usually caused by human error or application bugs.

OpenShift is a good solution, stability-wise.

The performance of OpenShift is good, but sometimes, it can be bad, depending on the network, but that's okay. That's normal. You won't have a very bad experience with OpenShift, performance-wise. You'll experience some issues from it, but it's still a good platform.

It is a perfectly stable product. If an application is ready to be containerized, it is seamless. You will not have any hiccups.

The stability has been good. We haven’t had any real issues up to this point. It’s been reliable, and the performance has been good.

It's stable. The cluster is pretty stable. With version 3.11, we were having some issues, and it wasn't a pretty stable cluster. We had issues often on the backend nodes, but version 4.x is very good. We have been using it for more than one year. We have had multiple versions such as 4.7, 4.8, and 4.9, and now, we are into 4.10. We upgraded our staging cluster to 4.10, and that upgrade was very smooth. We had some issues, but we were able to fix them.

The solution is stable. 

It's extremely stable. We haven't had any outages that were caused by the software. There have been issues due to human error on our side, such as not buying enough memory for the host. 

I would rate its stability abilities eight out of ten.

It's stable.

It's a very stable solution. Usually, problems occur when there's an application error or someone does something wrong and there is a human factor. For example, once there was an application creating a lot of automatic snapshots. There were volumes of snapshots, which couldn't be deleted easily. So, occasionally, there may be some bugs, but generally, it's very stable.

The solution is stable. We haven't experienced downtime. 

Stability-wise, I rate the solution an eight out of ten.

The tool is stable. 

This is a stable solution. 

OpenShift is stable. However, I feel it could be better but the local implementor is not giving us all the information.

It is very stable.

From some issues in production where some nodes went down, we just needed to improve in monitoring the Red Hat cluster. Then, we could know when there was degraded performance and repair it before it could cause an impact to the customer.

OpenShift is mostly stable. It's designed so that you seldom notice if it's unstable. I have no complaints.

We have found the solution to be very stable.

It is a stable platform.

This is a stable solution. 

The stability of the product is good. There may be a few bugs, however, in general, it works quite well. 

OpenShift is more stable than the Docker Platform. As a result, it is a stable platform for container workload deployment.

The solution is stable with no downtime.

OpenShift is a stable solution.

We did not encounter any issues with stability.

This solution offers excellent stability and we have not experienced any issues.

The solution is very stable.

It is a highly stable product. I rate the stability a ten out of ten.

The stability is quite strong, since it's a flavor of Kubernetes. We don't have any doubt about that aspect because we have never seen the infrastructure down for a long time, like a day.

We had stability issues, especially with earlier versions where the underlying Kubernetes wasn't stable at all.

Today we still have issues with Docker, which has known bugs not being backported to Red Hat supported versions.

This product is Production Ready. The Common Red Hat ERRATAs (security, enhancement, bug fixing) + Platform ImagesStreams provide a way to be updated with Security Constraints without backward compatibility issue.

Platform agility provides the Blue Green deployment workflow which makes available a new Business Unit version easily. ITOps Engineer defined resource capping, this help to gain stability.

No, I have not had any stability issues with OpenShift.

OpenShift is stable.

The product is stable, but it must be well designed.

We don't have bugs or glitches. We only have problems that are connected to our deployed applications, the applications that weren't fully prepared for the OpenShift deployment. 

There were no stability issues.

There have been some DNS issues.

The product seems to be mature enough to use for production application deployments without stability issues.

Not at this moment (still running in dev/QA phase).

Yes, as specified in areas for improvement answer.

This is a stable solution. I think we're going to stick with it.