OpenShift Review

Volume handling and security need improvement, but app uptime is good

What is our primary use case?

The OpenShift environment will be used by medical applications. This environment is still in the development/QA phase.

How has it helped my organization?

Not yet.

What is most valuable?

The scaling and uptime of the applications.

What needs improvement?

Needs work on volume handling (although this is already better with GlusterFS). Security (SSSD) would also be an improvement.

For how long have I used the solution?

Less than one year.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

Not at this moment (still running in dev/QA phase).

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

Not at this moment (still running in dev/QA phase).

How is customer service and technical support?

Five stars out of five, all issues were solved in an acceptable timeframe.

How was the initial setup?

This was my first installation. It was not straightforward due to internal limitations, not the product.

What other advice do I have?

I rate it a six out of 10. There are still some issues with it. I have several cases at Red Hat that need to be resolved.

Do a test to try the solution.

**Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
More OpenShift reviews from users
Find out what your peers are saying about Red Hat, Amazon, VMware and others in PaaS Clouds. Updated: June 2021.
511,307 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Add a Comment
ITCS user