it_user567825 - PeerSpot reviewer
Infrastructure Specialist at a insurance company with 1,001-5,000 employees
Vendor
It provides secure D2D backups with compression and deduplication. I'd like the ability to search backups a lot easier.

What is most valuable?

The valuable features are the ability to:

  • Backup data
  • Write to D2Ds
  • Utilize D2D compression technology

We write TBs and TBs of data to backend HPE D2Ds. It then dedupes all the information so we get a 10:1 ratio of deduplication. This means we can store a heck of a lot more data on less storage. It saves us time and money.

How has it helped my organization?

The benefit is that we've got data retention and we can store data for people. We are a financial services organization, so we are audited on the level of security of our data. This solution allows us to prove that we are storing it correctly.

What needs improvement?

I'd like the ability to search backups a lot easier. I'd like the ability to search for a particular server within a backup because people come to you and ask for the backup of a server. They talk about it in those terms. You end up trying to find out where that server is located for a particular job that you might have set up months ago. It would be good to have a search feature where you could ask, "Server X, what backup job is that?" That would be helpful.

It would be good if it worked properly and it actually gave you usable error codes.
A large percentage of the time, you get very vague messages, or it just turns off, and it never tells you why. It's very difficult to decipher what happened and what has gone wrong.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

The problem with HPE Data Protector is when it goes wrong, it's very hard to fathom why it went wrong.

Buyer's Guide
OpenText Data Protector
April 2024
Learn what your peers think about OpenText Data Protector. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: April 2024.
769,789 professionals have used our research since 2012.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

It's pretty scalable. Now we're on HPE Data Protector version 9.0, so you only have a single Cell Manager. We roll out globally so there's no issues with that side of it.

How are customer service and support?

We have to raise support tickets and that's an extremely painful thing. It can take five to seven weeks. That's the bad side of it. It is difficult to get decent support and to get to the people who know what they're talking about.

Initially, the technical support is terrible. You raise a call and then you are asked for log after log. What you want is someone who knows what they're doing who can help you right away. When you finally get through to those people a month later, they can normally resolve your issues within an hour. However, getting to them is very difficult.

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

We were already using it when I came to the company. I was more involved in the decision to upgrade.

How was the initial setup?

I was involved with the setup and it was reasonably straightforward. You install Cell Manager, then you create distribution servers, and then you roll out to a virtual machine. It's a pretty straightforward process.

Which other solutions did I evaluate?

We're probably going to have to start thinking about alternatives. Our data footprint is growing so rapidly that we're going to need to look at new solutions anyway. We have backup jobs that are over ten TBs for a single server. We need ways in which we can restore that data quickly.

We use 3PAR, so we're going to start looking at deduplication on it. We need snapshotting, and that sort of stuff. We've got to start looking at how we do things and how we can do them differently and faster. It may or not be with HPE.

What other advice do I have?

When it works, it works well. When it doesn't work, it can be very frustrating.
I would look across the whole marketplace and see what's out there.

Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
PeerSpot user
Jason Antes - PeerSpot reviewer
Jason AntesSenior Systems Engineer at a real estate/law firm with 1,001-5,000 employees
Real User

Almost all the errors Data Protector throws out come with an error code within the session messages.
"[Major] From: BSM@server.com "Production Archive by Month 2" Time: 1/4/2018 1:30:14 AM
[61:4006] Could not connect to inet in order to start BMA@server.com "VLS-032"."

The numbers inside the brackets is your error code. Usually a quick search of the internet or on the Data Protector forum will get an answer for you (you can also click on that number and it will give you more details along with suggested troubleshooting). I agree with errors outside the realm of the backup, copy, restore jobs can be a pain to track down, however the "Omni" utilities in \bin are available and will usually lead you to what is wrong and where. Sometimes the solution is non-trivial though. In other cases, like any other software, something critical goes wrong and it leads to a very long engagement with support. I had 1 with the barcode reader on automated tape libraries in which things would just fail out without any explanation and it took a lot of debug logs for them to figure it out. Those errors are pretty rare though.

As far as quicker backups on 3PAR, Data Protector does integrate with 3PAR and can use snapshot functionality, as well as there being Zero Downtime style backups. The problem with these is that it is another add-on license which can get expensive. Since you have a 3PAR, it may be worth looking into Recovery Manager Central or other integrated HPE solutions.

it_user414069 - PeerSpot reviewer
Senior Consultant at a tech services company with 5,001-10,000 employees
Real User
​It gives a good overview of which tape library and tape drives are connected.

Valuable Features:

It’s a very user friendly, easy to understand restore platform. The good thing about DP is that there is a Windows GUI version. This saves a lot of time and effort when one is learning on recovering using commands. The report generated by DP is very detailed as well.

Improvements to My Organization:

It gives a good overview of which tape library and tape drives are connected, and gives you the ability to restore selected portions of the tape and not necessarily the whole tape. You can even control the tape library using this software.

Room for Improvement:

When you unplug a laptop with the GUI version from the network, the restoration status will be terminated and will not update even if you try to connect it back. Which means to say, that I need to leave my laptop on and connected throughout the whole restore process, so that I can keep track of the restore status. There could have been an existing workaround for this, not that I know of one.

Deployment Issues:

I haven't had any issues with deployment.

Stability Issues:

See the above Areas for Improvement.

Scalability Issues:

I haven't had any issues with scalability.

Other Advice:

Overall, when compared with other restore solutions, I can say most of the good features are packed inside a software that has a small footprint.

Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
PeerSpot user
Buyer's Guide
OpenText Data Protector
April 2024
Learn what your peers think about OpenText Data Protector. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: April 2024.
769,789 professionals have used our research since 2012.
it_user384924 - PeerSpot reviewer
IT Adminstrator at a insurance company with 501-1,000 employees
Vendor
Feature-rich and capable, but not as reliable as it needs to be.

What is most valuable?

We purchased it as part of a package with StoreOnce. Its integration with StoreOnce was probably the key selling point for us and made us choose Data Protector and not one of the other products on the market that don't natively support StoreOnce. There's quite a wide range of application integrations, for example, with SQL Server, Exchange, and Hyper-V.

How has it helped my organization?

It's allowed us to reliably perform backups without a whole lot of constant attention required. Again, the integrations with SQL Server, Exchange, and Hyper-V are reliable and effective. The integration with SQL Server 2012 is particularly well-executed.

What needs improvement?

Data Protector is a fairly complicated product and some of the terminology is quite complex. There is a bit of a learning curve for new administrators who are working on it. Some of that could be eased by having a better GUI, which is not very good. There isn't much good reporting built-in to the GUI. For example, to see the status of yesterday's Exchange backup you have to click on and view all of the possible numbered backup sessions from yesterday until you find the one that relates to Exchange.

For how long have I used the solution?

I've used it for 18 months.

What was my experience with deployment of the solution?

We've had no issues with deployment.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

We have become frequent customers of the Data Protector technical support team because Data Protector does fairly regularly break. And it does so, generally, without any involvement on our part. The software is not as stable and reliable as it should be.

Invariably, the response from technical support to that is to install the latest set of patches for Data Protector. It's very frequently patched. Upgrading to the next patch release is quite a big task because you also have to upgrade all of the components running on all of the backup targets at the same time.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

We've had no issues with scalability.

How are customer service and technical support?

While they're fairly knowledgable, they're not very responsive. The turnaround time on critical tickets can be many days. First-level support is not very knowledgable, so virtually everything ends up going up to second-level support, who are, quite obviously, overworked.

Generally, once you're talking to someone, it's a reasonably good experience. But the response times aren't as good as they should be.

Technical support for Data Protector isn't as good as with 3PAR, the Blade platform, and the ProLiant servers. Support for those, 3PAR in particular, is noticeably better.

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

We previously used Tivoli Storage Manager, which was similar in complexity to Data Protector but less reliable. Tivoli required daily care and attention to keep it running. Data Protector, while imperfect, is significantly more reliable than Tivoli was for us.

How was the initial setup?

I'd say for a typical organization of our size, where you're not able to send someone on multiple training courses and make them the full-time "backup guy", it's probably going to be a project that requires external consultancy. There are very many moving parts. It's a complicated architecture with confusing and not-always-consistent terminology.

What other advice do I have?

Data Protector is a little bit more complicated than it should be. I think most people would probably agree that there's no such thing as good backup software, but Data Protector is certainly not the worst that we've used. It could be more reliable. It could be a little easier to understand. It could have a better user-interface, with better reporting. But in terms of actually, reliably, backing things up, it's superior to the other products that we've used in-house.

Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
PeerSpot user
it_user342660 - PeerSpot reviewer
Senior Systems Specialist at a financial services firm with 501-1,000 employees
Vendor
It provides us with Sharepoint item-level restore and assurances that the backup procedure is actually working. I'd like to see an updated GUI in the next release.

What is most valuable?

The most valuable features include Sharepoint item-level restore and integration with the vSphere hypervisor.

How has it helped my organization?

It provides us with more assurances that the backup procedure is actually working.

What needs improvement?

The user interface as the GUI is out-of-date and should be updated in the next release.

For how long have I used the solution?

I've used it for four or five years.

What was my experience with deployment of the solution?

We had some issues with the Exchange agent, but this was resolved with HP support.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

No issues encountered.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

No issues encountered.

How are customer service and technical support?

Customer Service:

No issues encountered.

Technical Support:

Tech support varies a bit depending on who takes the call. Generally speaking, it’s at a professional level.

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

We previously used CA Arcserve.

How was the initial setup?

The product is somewhat complex because of container object permission inheritance. Compared to a “normal” Windows software, it was a bit more complicated.

What about the implementation team?

Implementation was done by a value added reseller (VAR) and their level of expertise was adequate.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

In theory, the pricing structure is quite simple: just pick what you need. But the price tag might be a little on the high side.

Which other solutions did I evaluate?

We also evaluated Symantec Backup Exec.

What other advice do I have?

Get a professional to do the initial configuration and, after that, you can continue on your own.

Disclosure: PeerSpot contacted the reviewer to collect the review and to validate authenticity. The reviewer was referred by the vendor, but the review is not subject to editing or approval by the vendor.
PeerSpot user
Operations Manager at a wholesaler/distributor with 1-10 employees
Real User
Easy to use, stable, and provides heterogeneous protection
Pros and Cons
  • "What I like the most about this solution is that I can change and access the Oracle backup file."
  • "I would like to see a better user interface in the next release."

What is our primary use case?

The solution is used in protection across a heterogeneous computing environment.

What is most valuable?

What I like the most about this solution is that I can change and access the Oracle file. 

What needs improvement?

I would like to see a better user interface in the next release. 

For how long have I used the solution?

I have used the solution for 20 years. 

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

In my experience, I found the solution to be stable.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

The solution is scalable. There are approximately 10 users using it in my organization.

How are customer service and technical support?

Since I am using the solution as a trainer, I have not used any technical support.  

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

I have used StorONE solution before. 

How was the initial setup?

I have installed the solution myself. It was easy and took approximately 40 minutes. 

What about the implementation team?

 There is one administrator necessary for the deployment of the solution. 

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

The solution requires paying for a license.

What other advice do I have?

I would recommend the solution to others. 

I rate Micro Focus Data Protector an eight out of ten. 

Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

On-premises
Disclosure: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer: Partner
PeerSpot user
it_user611967 - PeerSpot reviewer
Project Manager at a tech services company with 51-200 employees
Consultant
Backup solution that allows us to configure, backup, and restore data on our severs. I would like to see better data integrity.

What is most valuable?

The most valuable feature is the Integration with Oracle, MSSQL and Exchange. They are the easiest to work with.

Unlike some other backup solutions, the configuration and restoration of the data is really easy. Just check it and you are done. We don't have to meddle with configuration files or create several of them, as is the case with IBM Spectrum Protect.

The mailbox restore works wonderfully on Data Protector. The RMAN scripts created by the solution save a lot of time for the database department.

How has it helped my organization?

The process to restore a database from one server to another got really easy. It improved the amount of requests the backup administration unit could attend to.

What needs improvement?

They could really improve on the integrity. A lot of times I get the log error or no log message. To get my data, I have to scan the tape. It's not really the best way to go with the product. It should be more robust.

For how long have I used the solution?

I have used this solution since 2013.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

The server is stable. The issues are regarding what was saved. Sometimes you have to read the tape to get what was saved.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

The migration to Data Protector 9 was a nightmare. Migrating to another version is really complicated. Adding more servers is easy.

When I tried to migrate the catalog, the history of backups got lost. HPE was working on a fix.

It's important that data history remains in all migrations. Otherwise, the solution cannot be used on environments with long expiration dates, such as in a bank where data must be kept for ten years.

How are customer service and technical support?

Technical support is not the best. They take a lot of time to solve complex problems, but at least you know they are trying their best.

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

I used IBM Spectrum Protect for over five years. The company switched because the licensing costs were large.

How was the initial setup?

The installation was really straightforward. Just check the integration and you are done. The only consideration is that you must have a really powerful profile to do all the installations.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

Data Protector has one of the most flexible and affordable prices. I suggest the following:

  • Always check the expiration timeframe for the data
  • Keep the SLA actualized for every unit
  • Avoid backing up data without control and for longer period of times than needed

Which other solutions did I evaluate?

We evaluated Veritas NetBackup, IBM Spectrum Protect, and Microfost.

What other advice do I have?

It's a great product. You must read the logs every day to be sure that everything runs smoothly. It is really easy to backup and restore your data across all servers, something that IBM Spectrum Protect struggles to do.

Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
PeerSpot user
Yilak Yigezu - PeerSpot reviewer
CTO at united system integrators
Real User
Good dashboards, easy implementation, and scalable
Pros and Cons
  • "The dashboards in Micro Focus Data Protector are very good. They are similar to the dashboards in Veeam Backup & Replication."
  • "The Micro Focus Data Protector support is not as good as Veeam Backup & Replication's support."

What is our primary use case?

Micro Focus Data Protector is used for data backups.

What is most valuable?

The dashboards in Micro Focus Data Protector are very good. They are similar to the dashboards in Veeam Backup & Replication. 

For how long have I used the solution?

I have been using Micro Focus Data Protector for approximately 16 years.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

Micro Focus Data Protector is highly stable.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

I have found Micro Focus Data Protector to be scalable.

How are customer service and support?

The Micro Focus Data Protector support is not as good as Veeam Backup & Replication's support.

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

I have used Veritas and Veeam Backup & Replication.

How was the initial setup?

The solution is easy to implement.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

They have two types of licensing, one is for storage capacity and the other is client licensing. The capacity licensing here is a bit expensive.

If Micro Focus Data Protector has a universal license for every aspect of the operation, there would be no limit to us. For example, they have a different license for Exchange, Oracle, and SQL. You have to have an online license, it can be an expensive adventure.

What other advice do I have?

I rate Micro Focus Data Protector an eight out of ten.

Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

On-premises
Disclosure: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer: partner
PeerSpot user
Alliance Manager at Berca Hardaya Perkasa
Real User
Easy setup but lacks compatibility and scalability
Pros and Cons
  • "The initial setup was relatively easy."
  • "This solution is not scalable."

What needs improvement?

This product needs a lot of improvement both on the technical side and in its pricing and compatibility.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

This solution is not scalable.

How are customer service and support?

I don't think this product has a good support center.

How was the initial setup?

The initial setup was relatively easy.

What other advice do I have?

I would rate this solution as five out of ten.

Disclosure: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer: partner
PeerSpot user
Buyer's Guide
Download our free OpenText Data Protector Report and get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions.
Updated: April 2024
Product Categories
Backup and Recovery
Buyer's Guide
Download our free OpenText Data Protector Report and get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions.