We performed a comparison between Alfabet IT Planning & Portfolio Management, Broadcom Clarity , and JIRA Portfolio based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about monday.com, Broadcom, ServiceNow and others in Project Portfolio Management."The dashboard is the most valuable feature."
"Demand, Resource, Project Portfolio Management, for my business consulting services, PMO services to other clients."
"It is very stable. We are on demand. With on demand, those guys keep it running."
"It is easier to use than most other products that are out there."
"Right now, it's the PPM piece of it, the scheduling, the Gantt, the task view."
"It is very intuitive. Even if you do not have training documents or anything, you can start feeling your way around pretty easily."
"It is a scalable, easy-to-deploy, and user-friendly solution for enterprise businesses."
"I appreciate the report that shows how utilized a person is set to be within the coming months. I use that feature a good bit."
"The most valuable feature is the portfolio functionality because we have the ability to work with different scenarios and many kinds of financial management. We can integrate with ERP, and with other solutions from third-party vendors. The financial model in Broadcom Clarity PPM, it's the most valuable aspect."
"Its stability is very reliable."
"Version management is the most valuable feature of JIRA Portfolio."
"The solution is very stable."
"The developers can simplify tasks and each one of them can undertake a task and then they continue with development. Our processes are more efficient and easier for our manager and developers to track them. Their work is more organized."
"The graphics and the resolution of the work are very good."
"Has good analysis integration capabilities."
"The initial setup is simple."
"The documentation is very well done."
"The user-experience, enhanced performance, and in-hand governance can be improved."
"The integration needs to be improved with Jaspersoft and Microsoft Project."
"I would really like a modern UI. I do not want to get on a user interface and feel like I am in the 1990's."
"The Broadcom Clarity PPM dashboard needs improvement , because it's too slow. The look and feel of the platform, including its UX, also need some enhancement."
"In terms of what could be improved, the end user interface could be improved to be more intuitive, because we sometimes have issues with customization. Sometimes we are not able to customize everything for the end user's interface, and they require more customization. We should be able to perform a deeper customization here."
"I think user-friendliness is the key. Right now it's really clunky. We're also looking to upgrade, but an upgrade is not going to fix everything. The new UX is good, but there are still a lot of limitations. Once they work through those kinks and get those limitations removed, we'll be able to upgrade."
"One of the major pain points for me when it comes to Broadcom Clarity PPM is the new UI. The new UI is very good in terms of functionality and the drag and draw features, but it's not very responsive. When I say that it's not very responsive, what I mean is that sometimes, the tool is not very user-friendly. For example, a user saves a value on the form, but the tool doesn't give any indication to the user that the value has been saved. Some users are moving from the classic UI to the new UI, and end up getting confused because on the classic UI, when you click "Save", it'll save the information and you'll get an indication that it was saved. With the new UI, it auto saves the information, but it doesn't give an indication in the form of a popup box that "this form has been saved", or any type of message indicating that the information was successfully saved. It's been confusing for users who move to the new UI because of that. The users don't understand when the values are being saved or not being saved, even if there's an auto-save feature in the new UI."
"Could be using more updated technologies."
"The solution could improve the way the workflow is developed. I think they could be more dynamic because they are in a way static. They're very powerful, but they don't have any interaction with end-users."
"The automation in JIRA Portfolio could improve, it takes some time. We have to do some other tactics to have the same integration. Manually integrating something will take more work than if it was automated, but the automation scripting in the solution is not simple."
"The HR aspect of the solution could be improved."
"n the next version I would like to see better reporting and safer plugins, as well as easier scalability."
"It would be really nice if the solution provided a heads-up every time they enhance something or add new features."
"The integration needs to be done with different tools."
"With Jira, an issue that arises is the length of time it takes to show certain data."
"If you want to generate a report for individual usage, it's difficult."
"Jira has room for improvement in terms of managing various projects and linking requirements centrally under one project. They could include some add-ons that enable you to link all the requirements and put them into a centralized place. That central place should be restricted to a limited set of users with privileges based on user groups with those rights."
More Alfabet IT Planning & Portfolio Management Pricing and Cost Advice →
