We performed a comparison between Broadcom Clarity , Microsoft Project Server, and Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about monday.com, Broadcom, ServiceNow and others in Project Portfolio Management.
"We have a centralized view that we can have in our delivery and business organizations."
"It is easier to use than most other products that are out there."
"It has highlighted areas in our company that were deficient in resources. It has allowed us to hire, then realize more benefits regarding the number of projects we can get done."
"The new UI makes it easier for people to go in there and know what to do. To train people, it's faster, more intuitive."
"Within the SaaS environment (since CA is supporting it), it has been extremely stable and reliable."
"The interfaces for project management, portfolio management, and reporting services are always helpful."
"I love the fact that it is very flexible. I am the lead engineer with enhancements, development, developing new portlets, anything that has to be added on, and integrating data, such as ETL processing."
"Project Management features that are excellent in managing the Project Management Life-cycle, along with other related details like Financials, Resources and flexibility to customize, as per requirement."
"It is easily adaptable. In addition, it is easily used on mobile applications."
"The scheduling and the customization are very powerful."
"Technical support is good."
"The key things are managing interactions, resource allocation, resource-leveling (enterprise) and as a collaborative tool, because we use it across multiple projects at a time."
"The solution is scalable and easy to expand."
"I found the portfolio management valuable."
"In the competitive landscape of project management and portfolio management solutions, Microsoft Project Server stands out significantly."
"It is a scalable solution. We have been able to manage larger scale projects easily using this solution."
"I like Primavera's planning capabilities."
"The solution's tech support is good."
"The most valuable feature of Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management is accuracy."
"The ability to streamline the process of obtaining signatures from our contractors is valuable."
"Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management is a well-engineered product from an IT perspective."
"I want to see integration for SMS functionality."
"In the next release, I would like to have a little bit more functionality on chatbots in Clarity PPM, especially for support requests, such as for the most commonly used support tickets that people could resolve themselves."
"I think user-friendliness is the key. Right now it's really clunky. We're also looking to upgrade, but an upgrade is not going to fix everything. The new UX is good, but there are still a lot of limitations. Once they work through those kinks and get those limitations removed, we'll be able to upgrade."
"The classic UI is very cumbersome. It can do everything but it's hard to use. It's easy to use once you understand it, but it's intimidating at first for somebody to see the solution."
"I would really like a modern UI. I do not want to get on a user interface and feel like I am in the 1990's."
"I'd like to see blueprints. I'd also like to see the user interface simplified, and to have a lot of templates available on each blueprint."
"A little bit better financial management. Right now it is more accountant-related, the financial management - of course, it's finance, it has to be financial. But it should be a little bit easier for project managers."
"Broadcom Clarity PPM could improve by adding advanced reporting in the tool. There are a lot of out-of-the-box reports, but I would like to see more advanced reporting."
"The solution should be made more collaborative."
"It needs to be more collaborative from inside the application. It only does project scheduling for me. It would be good if it could do other things and be more collaborative, such as sharing tasks for users. It is not really incorporated into MS Office, so you can't copy-paste stuff. It is on its own, doing its own thing. It is only used for scheduling, and it doesn't work well with anything else."
"EPM 2010 UI seems a bit dated now that 2016 is available."
"The deployment aspect of the product is a bit tedious."
"It has to be more user-friendly. For instance, there should be some assistance, like when you go to certain sites, people pop up and say, "Can we help you? What are you looking for?" It's not interactive enough."
"The cost could be lower."
"In terms of tech support, it took a long time for them to resolve a ticket."
"The solution needs to be much more stable."
"They should work on integrating the solution with ERP."
"The scalability has room for improvement."
"Primavera could be better integrated with other products, and it needs more cost management features."
"The reporting could improve project management. We need multiple source reports. If someone is new to the support it has a steep learning curve."
"The solution's user interface is an area with shortcomings that need improvement."
More Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management Pricing and Cost Advice →
