OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence vs OpenText SiteScope vs SCOM comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
OpenText Logo
1,847 views|878 comparisons
91% willing to recommend
Broadcom Logo
155 views|115 comparisons
96% willing to recommend
Microsoft Logo
Read 77 SCOM reviews
1,435 views|885 comparisons
86% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between OpenText SiteScope, OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence, and SCOM based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Datadog, Dynatrace, New Relic and others in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability.
To learn more, read our detailed Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability Report (Updated: April 2024).
768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The most valuable feature of SiteScope is its infrastructure monitoring.""The product's readymade templates are perfect. It supports us a lot when we don't have much experience with the product. The templates offers us direction to proceed.""It has multiple monitors that can be deployed OOTB, which includes basic system monitors for CPU, Disk, Memory, NIC's, etc.""The URL monitoring is excellent.""SiteScope has built-in flat file DB, hence it removes the dependency of an external DB for higher stability.""It's easy to template standard monitoring configurations, and automate monitoring configuration.""Simplest tool for monitoring servers, web content, databases and other hardware. Its dashboard is really good.""VM monitoring is pretty good showing good visualizations of how VMs are operating within the context of all the VMs running on the same hypervisor."

More OpenText SiteScope Pros →

"Their technical support is incredible, immediately responsive, and even if it is not updated to Level 2 support sometimes, they chip in providing more detailed answers and options to fix the problem.""OPS/REXX is valuable because it allows us almost unlimited flexibility in automating our system.""With the automation pieces we can bring this region up or take this region down, and it allows us to always meet our time critical requirements.""Stability is probably the best out-of-the-box. Put it in, set it up, and you leave it alone. It works wonderfully.""It allows us to respond faster to issues. If there are issues that come out, we're able to capture a message and alert somebody about it.""It's a very stable product. I very much like the SSM stuff in it. The rules engine, it's awesome.""Valuable features include: SSM, which provides for orderly startup and shutdown; OPSLOG, which enables filtering by message-id, and/or jobname(s); Rules, as OPS/REXX interface streamlines deployment, interfaces easily with JES2 and z/OS.""It's very flexible. You can customize what you need to, which is good. For example, you can do your own coding inside the tool, make your own scripting tooling."

More OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence Pros →

"This solution allows us to standardize all of the reports for monitoring the network, so it helps a lot for auditing purposes.""SCOM's most valuable features are the network path feature, reporting, and integration with business intelligence.""This solution saves us a lot of work because it reduces the effort that is required in order to start monitoring.""The ease of deployment, especially on Windows platforms, is valuable.""We are able to do problem determination on runaway processes.""The product’s auto-remediation feature helps with automation.""The solution primarily drives system information, and I believe it works fine.""The solution's reporting engine has given me detailed information on which applications or services I've either failed or about to fail in terms of the predictive makeup on Azure cloud."

More SCOM Pros →

Cons
"Micro Focus Voltage SiteScope could improve by adding more features, such as cloud, APM, and DevOps monitoring.""You can use OpenText SiteScope for small or middle environments. But if you want to monitor a large environment, it is not scalable. If you can monitor a large environment with OpenText SiteScope, it can be a valuable product.""SiteScope isn't productive if you want to monitor RAM or if you want to monitor some URL.""It should improve its integrations with various tools, especially service management tools.""We'd like a uniform interface for monitoring our system, since that's the purpose of SiteScope.""It may lack some features other products in the category have like more detailed transaction tracking.""I would be very interested in having transaction traceability included in the product, to give us a better view of what is really going wrong in a particular method and action.""The lack of an agent means that remote monitoring requires multiple firewall ports to be opened."

More OpenText SiteScope Cons →

"Performing a stop/restart of OPS/MVS could be a little smoother. Without special coding, some undesired tasks will be started and some necessary tasks will be stopped if we have to bounce OPS/MVS during the day.""The interfaces to USS, CA UIM could be better. CA Common Services interfaces - namely Zdata Mover, Zmessage Service, Zdatacolletcor - are poorly documented.""​It’s a complex product. The initial installation is easy, but implementing various functions is a constant process.​""It definitely needs more web-based interface, to be more mobile-open. More APIs, more open source to it.""Scalability is zero. It cannot be scaled because of its age.""Because of its age, it's a little bit difficult to modernize some of the integrations and some of the functions.""One thing that comes to mind is the MQ interface. The last time we tried to use it, it seemed a little clunky.""The GUI interface could be improved, but that is coming. They are working on that."

More OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence Cons →

"SCOM's feature that notifies us when a server is down is not present in recent updates, which has weakened the product.""It'll help if they can provide real-time or closer to real-time monitoring.""It lacks certain details that other products do better, like granular access and better application monitoring.""Direct integration with third-party tools, like ticketing systems, is lacking but would be beneficial.""The solution should be more user-friendly and offer a better user interface.""Third-party tools have had to be created to make SCOM management pack creation more efficient and effective. However, this weighs down the application as it just adds a resource requirement, which is ballooning the size of the necessary storage and all that for essentially substandard components.""The end-user components, including the dashboards, the administration console, and the web console, need to be improved.""The solution’s initial setup is difficult."

More SCOM Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "Licensing is a little steep."
  • "Depending on your requirements, there are two licensing models available. A simple point model, or an endpoint model."
  • "SiteScope licensing can be node based-or monitor-based. I would recommend for node-based licensing."
  • "You have to pay for their "solution templates". Other tools do not charge you for knowledge-based monitoring bundles."
  • "When Micro Focus Voltage SiteScope has introduced approximately eight years ago and there was not very much competition making the price high. However, when comparing the price of Micro Focus Voltage SiteScope now to other tools, they should reduce the price. It is similar to a legacy tool at this point."
  • "It is expensive. I don't like its licensing. I don't like anything where you have to license it by individual licenses. I'm not a fan of that, but that's just me."
  • "The pricing or licensing cost for Micro Focus SiteScope is often bundled with other things, so the cost for each individual would be difficult to calculate. Pricing could be $2,000,000 a year. My company pays for technical support because it's part of the contract with Micro Focus SiteScope. You buy the licenses, but you're also paying for the support. With Nagios, it's much more bare-bones as far as paying for licenses and the software itself, and my company didn't have to use as much Nagios support yet in one or two years because there weren't too many problems using Nagios, and it's much more cost-effective, so that's one of the reasons why my company is migrating to Nagios from Micro Focus SiteScope."
  • "The product's pricing should be lower since there are many open-source products that can do the same job with better user interfaces. The tool's pricing is yearly and you need to pay for support."
  • More OpenText SiteScope Pricing and Cost Advice →

    Information Not Available
  • "The pricing and licensing are fair."
  • "Our licensing fees are approximately $30 per user, per month."
  • "If you have a Microsoft Enterprise Agreement, then this is part of the agreement."
  • "It is more expensive than the competition."
  • "SCOM is part of the System Center suite and I am satisfied with the pricing."
  • "We have an enterprise agreement that includes this product as part of it."
  • "The pricing is good, and it's part of their system center suite."
  • "We have to pay for a license and the price is fine for us."
  • More SCOM Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability solutions are best for your needs.
    768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:The most valuable feature of SiteScope is its infrastructure monitoring.
    Top Answer:I would rate the pricing of SiteScope as a five out of ten in terms of costliness. It is not overly expensive, but there… more »
    Top Answer:In terms of improvement, OpenText SiteScop could become a better solution by adding more monitoring templates, like… more »
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    Top Answer:The solution's reporting engine has given me detailed information on which applications or services I've either failed… more »
    Top Answer:It is the cheapest product available in the market. I rate the pricing a one out of ten.
    Top Answer:The solution should have more tools for monitoring the cloud engine versus on-premise. It sufficiently covers the on… more »
    Ranking
    Views
    1,847
    Comparisons
    878
    Reviews
    7
    Average Words per Review
    643
    Rating
    7.6
    14th
    out of 20 in Event Monitoring
    Views
    155
    Comparisons
    115
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    3rd
    out of 20 in Event Monitoring
    Views
    1,435
    Comparisons
    885
    Reviews
    10
    Average Words per Review
    433
    Rating
    8.1
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Micro Focus SiteScope, HPE SiteScope, SiteScope
    CA OPS MVS Event Management and Automation, CA OPS/MVS Event Management and Automation, Unicenter CA-OPS/MVS Event Management and Automation
    System Center Operations Manager, SCOM 2012
    Learn More
    Overview

    OpenText SiteScope is an agentless monitoring program that tracks the availability and performance of distributed IT infrastructures such as servers, network devices and services, applications and application components, virtualization software, operating systems, and other IT enterprise components.

    OpenText SiteScope is an autonomous hybrid IT monitoring system that can monitor more than 100 different types of IT components in real time, thanks to a lightweight and highly customizable remote access architecture.

    With OpenText SiteScope, IT teams can get the data they need to keep on top of problems and eliminate bottlenecks before they become major concerns.

    OpenText SiteScope can reduce total cost of ownership (TCO) by utilizing agentless technology, which eliminates the need to install and monitor agents on each box. Manual activities can be automated, and teams can save time and effort by using pre-packaged solution templates.

    OpenText SiteScope Features

    OpenText SiteScope has many valuable key features. Some of the most useful ones include:

    • Broad functionality built on expertise: OpenText SiteScope's architecture is scalable and supports a broad range of functions, including data collecting, alerting, event management, and reporting. Data is collected via remote access, which eliminates the need for agents to be deployed and maintained on monitored nodes. OpenText SiteScope connects to systems as a remote user via the central server, which supports JMX, SNMP, HTTP, SSH, NetBIOS, and WMI.
    • Monitors legacy and modern environments: OpenText SiteScope comes with more than 100 built-in monitors that track things like utilization, response time, use, and resource availability.

      • Cloud: You can monitor virtual servers and applications on Amazon Web Services (AWS). AWS-hosted applications can provide data to Amazon CloudWatch, which can be used for auto-scaling, reporting, and alerting.

      • Virtualization: OpenText SiteScope supports VMware, Microsoft, Citrix, and Oracle/Sun virtualization technologies. Monitor Docker clusters, nodes, containers, and workloads.
    • Flexibility with configuration: By adding or deleting specific monitors, you can adapt to dynamic changes in data center configuration.
    • Templates for solutions: The template database is based on best practices for monitoring complex application settings with the least amount of time and effort. The templates include built-in domain experience of specialized monitors, default metrics and thresholds, proactive testing, and best practices for a given application or monitoring component.
    • Notifications, alerts, and reports: Email, SNMP traps, HTTP post, and database alerts are all supported. Administrators receive alerts based on defined thresholds and schedules.
    • Flexibility in user management: Using LDAP or an internal management solution, define group-level permissions, construct user roles, and assign security groups depending on role. Extensive WS (Web Service)-based API that automates numerous management situations without the need for the SiteScope UI.
    • Integrations with SiteScope: OpenText SiteScope not only offers a number of benefits on its own, but it can also be linked with a number of OpenText and third-party solutions, giving teams the ability to properly integrate their IT operations center.
    z/OS, its subsystems, databases, middleware, applications, and software generate thousands of event messages daily. IT professionals need a tool to filter, prioritize, and respond quickly to these events before they impact availability and threaten business processing and associated service level agreements. CA OPS/MVS EMA automates processes, enabling you to resolve problems as they arise. It also automates more routine tasks, simplifying IT management and operations.

    SCOM (System Center Operations Manager) is a cross-platform data center monitoring and reporting tool that checks the status of various objects defined within the environment, such as server hardware, system services, etc. The solution allows data center administrators to deploy, configure, manage, and monitor the operations, services, devices and applications of multiple enterprise IT systems via a single pane of glass. It is suitable for businesses of all sizes.

    SCOM Features

    SCOM has many valuable key features. Some of the most useful ones include:

    • Application monitoring
    • Database monitoring
    • Threshold alerts
    • IT Asset Discovery
    • Predictive capabilities
    • Server usage monitoring and capacity forecasting
    • Application performance management console
    • Server availability and performance monitoring
    • Collaboration tools
    • Virtualization monitoring
    • Patch management
    • Out-of-the box templates to monitor applications
    • Application dependency mapping and thresholding

    SCOM Benefits

    There are several benefits to implementing SCOM. Some of the biggest advantages the solution offers include:

    • Management and monitoring of Windows as well as Unix/Linux platforms
    • Remotely connect to Windows machines and perform administrative tasks from the console itself
    • Custom dashboard creation to help monitor the datacenter with ease
    • Agent based monitoring
    • Integrates well with other Microsoft products
    • Easy to use and reliable

    Reviews from Real Users

    Below are some reviews and helpful feedback written by PeerSpot users currently using the SCOM solution.

    A Manager at a financial services firm says, “The feature I like most about SCOM is that it is easy-to-use. I find it very user-friendly. I also like the knowledge base which it has. You can find the resolution to questions or issues directly within the SCOM itself. It will alert you with a recommendation of what you need to do at the same time. This sort of self-diagnosis or prompting is one of the great values you get from SCOM compared to other solutions.”

    PeerSpot user Zahari Z., Information Technology Auditor at a financial services firm, mentions, “Availability monitoring is the feature I have found most valuable, as well as the capacity and ability to send notifications. There is a mechanism to set up a notification from the SCOM and whenever there is a drop in the availability the notification alerts not only for availability but for other issues as well. You can align thresholds according to the speed of your environment and you can have a threshold related notification, which is one of the useful features.”

    Bill W., Sr. Systems Engineer at Arapahoe County Government, comments, “ I like some of their newer features, such as maintenance schedules, because SCOM records SLA and SLO time. When we patch, things are automatically put into maintenance mode so that the numbers for our systems being down, do not count against us.”

    A Project Manager at a tech services company explains, “The feature I have found most valuable is the book feature. While we run the Sprint one we can add some setups for multiple sprints.”

    A Systems Engineer at an educational organization states, “Because it's Windows-based, it actually reports quite well. It reports everything you can think of on the Windows server and allows you to monitor anything. It's excellent for those in the Windows world as it's very good at it.”

    Sample Customers
    Vodafone Ireland, Kuveyt Turk Participation Bank
    Tieto
    Dialog Telekom
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Computer Software Company31%
    Financial Services Firm23%
    Comms Service Provider15%
    Recruiting/Hr Firm8%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm30%
    Manufacturing Company15%
    Computer Software Company9%
    Government6%
    REVIEWERS
    Financial Services Firm57%
    Healthcare Company10%
    Energy/Utilities Company10%
    Insurance Company10%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm31%
    Computer Software Company12%
    Manufacturing Company11%
    Logistics Company9%
    REVIEWERS
    Financial Services Firm21%
    Retailer13%
    Government9%
    University6%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm15%
    Computer Software Company12%
    Government11%
    Manufacturing Company8%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business30%
    Midsize Enterprise7%
    Large Enterprise63%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business24%
    Midsize Enterprise6%
    Large Enterprise70%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business4%
    Large Enterprise96%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business7%
    Midsize Enterprise5%
    Large Enterprise88%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business19%
    Midsize Enterprise24%
    Large Enterprise58%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business16%
    Midsize Enterprise14%
    Large Enterprise70%
    Buyer's Guide
    Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability
    April 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Datadog, Dynatrace, New Relic and others in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability. Updated: April 2024.
    768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.