Learn what your peers think about OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: April 2024.

DOWNLOAD NOW

768,857 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Leo Cadegan

Systems Programmer at a financial services firm with 1,001-5,000 employees

Nov 26, 2017

The performance of it is beyond exceptional. It is probably one of the best products that I have ever worked with. It is easy to use, comprehensive, and can perform almost any task you need it to.

Read full review

it_user581055

IT Team Manager at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees

Jan 7, 2018

It's a very stable product. I very much like the SSM stuff in it. The rules engine, it's awesome.

Read full review

it_user778950

Systems Programmer at a energy/utilities company with 5,001-10,000 employees

Nov 26, 2017

It reduces the number of repetitive motions required by a human to respond to the system.

Read full review

it_user779298

Systems Programmer at Regions Financial Corporation

Nov 26, 2017

I can and interrupt what's going on, bring a job down if I need to, and bring it back up.

Read full review

it_user851853

Lead z/OS Systems Programmer

Apr 8, 2018

OPS/REXX is valuable because it allows us almost unlimited flexibility in automating our system.

Read full review

it_user778542

Systems Engineer at a healthcare company with 5,001-10,000 employees

Nov 26, 2017

With the automation pieces we can bring this region up or take this region down, and it allows us to always meet our time critical requirements.

Read full review

it_user2991

z/OS system Programmer at a tech services company with 1-10 employees

Feb 6, 2018

Once automatic IPL has been defined, anyone can perform an IPL with very little intervention. We know that all of the components will be started correctly.

Read full review

Show 2 more reviews (out of 12)

OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence Cons review quotes

it_user779109

IT Director at McKesson

Nov 26, 2017

Because of its age, it's a little bit difficult to modernize some of the integrations and some of the functions.

Read full review

Leo Cadegan

Systems Programmer at a financial services firm with 1,001-5,000 employees

Nov 26, 2017

The GUI interface could be improved, but that is coming. They are working on that.

Read full review

it_user778950

Systems Programmer at a energy/utilities company with 5,001-10,000 employees

Nov 26, 2017

The reason sometimes it is not stable, we do not have the expertise to write the script.

Read full review

Buyer's Guide

OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence

April 2024

Free Report: OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence Reviews and More

Learn what your peers think about OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: April 2024.

DOWNLOAD NOW

768,857 professionals have used our research since 2012.

it_user779298

Systems Programmer at Regions Financial Corporation

Nov 26, 2017

Some of the command sequences are too long.

Read full review

it_user851853

Lead z/OS Systems Programmer

Apr 8, 2018

One thing that comes to mind is the MQ interface. The last time we tried to use it, it seemed a little clunky.

Read full review

it_user2991

z/OS system Programmer at a tech services company with 1-10 employees

Feb 6, 2018

It’s a complex product. The initial installation is easy, but implementing various functions is a constant process.

Read full review

Nick Cianco

Lead Technology Architect Systems Programmer at Cerner Corporation

May 15, 2018

The interfaces to USS, CA UIM could be better. CA Common Services interfaces - namely Zdata Mover, Zmessage Service, Zdatacolletcor - are poorly documented.

Read full review