The solution is basically infrastructure to service the cloud.
It can be used for everything. It can be for anything. It's an intelligently designed system that can run any workload, on any data for backup, for production, for anything you imagine.
The solution is basically infrastructure to service the cloud.
It can be used for everything. It can be for anything. It's an intelligently designed system that can run any workload, on any data for backup, for production, for anything you imagine.
The solution is very easy to install. In a few clicks, you get what you need.
The solution is stable.
The scalability is very good.
Technical support is helpful and responsive.
The initial setup is easy.
The solution would be better if it was more secure. That's an aspect they need to work on.
I've been dealing with the solution for five years.
The stability and reliability are great. The performance is good. It doesn't crash or freeze and there are no bugs or glitches.
The scalability is good. A company can expand it as needed. It's not a problem.
We have about 100 people on the solution currently.
We've used technical support in the past, and they are fine. We've been satisfied with the level of service provided to us.
As a cloud-based solution, there isn't really an installation required. Everything sits in the cloud. You don't need to download or install anything. The setup might take a few months.
I handled the initial setup myself. I did not need any help from integrators or consultants.
While you may have to pay for some of the product kits, it's a monthly fee for everything.
As a cloud-based solution, we're always using the latest version.
I'd rate the solution at an eight out of ten. I'm pretty happy with the stuff you can do with it, however, I would like it to be more secure.
I would recommend the solution to other users and organizations.
We are customers of Amazon AWS.
This solution is very easy to use and it has a professional interface. It's easy to access and is secure, two important features.
The cost of the solution could be improved, it's quite expensive. I find the networking to be overly complex.
I've been using this solution for four years.
Amazon AWS is a stable product.
The solution is scalable.
The initial setup was complex because of the networking setup we needed to create. This could have been a problem with the networking site.
We currently use Azure as well. AWS offers a very good platform mask and is easy to use. Azure is good for creating virtual machines and creating VLANs is very easy with the Azure site.
I rate this solution an eight out of 10.
We're using several Amazon products. We use Amazon AWS Compute Service, AWS Elastic Load Balancing, and a huge private VPN or a virtual private network are created out of it. We also use an API Gateway. There are several products and several services that AWS provides, and we're using them.
The compute and the elasticness of the compute is really great. Whenever there's a load, it automatically adds the servers and then reduces the servers based on the configuration. This is really wonderful, more cost-effective, and it's been really good for us.
AWS support could be better.
I have been using Amazon AWS for many years.
AWS support could be better. It could be faster and straightforward.
There's no initial setup or installation. It's all configuration.
A few of our customers pay for it yearly and monthly. Sometimes, when it's related to the data, the pricing seems to be high. It could be cheaper on a transactional basis.
We did evaluate a couple of other products like Google Cloud and RTCloud, but our customers decided to go with AWS.
I would recommend this cloud solution to new customers.
On a scale from one to ten, I would give Amazon AWS an eight.
We are using this solution for internet applications.
I have found the trusted advisor tool works well, we are using it to get some insight into the security status and the processing of the applications. Additionally, the portal for management has clear well-written documentation.
I have been using the solution for two years.
We have not had any major issue with stability, it is quite stable.
The scalability is good.
The technical support can take longer than expected sometimes. They could improve on this.
The initial installation was easy.
We did the deployment ourselves.
The price of the solution is fair compared to competitors.
I would recommend this solution to others.
I rate Amazon AWS a seven out of ten.
We used it for hosting our ERP and databases and the applications that we develop for working with our customers. We are using a lot of Amazon AWS services. It is a mixed environment, and we have a lot of components.
The capacity to grow dynamically based on our needs is most valuable. We can increase resources dynamically. It is also very reliable and fast to implement.
Their support can be improved. In some cases, their support is not as proficient as it can be. They should be quicker at getting back.
I have been using this solution for two years.
It is stable.
It is scalable. It is very easy to scale if you need more resources. We have around 150 users of this solution in our company.
They need to be faster.
It was very easy and fast.
I would rate Amazon AWS a nine out of ten.
It is very easy to set up. It is also easy to use.
It has a lot of services and integrations. We've been able to integrate whatever we need until now.
Its subscription model or pricing model is too complex, which should be improved.
I have been using this solution for three years.
It is stable. We have not seen any issues so far.
It is scalable.
We have interacted with them. They are good, and we've not had any issues with them.
It is very easy to set up.
Its pricing model is too complex.
I would advise others to do a test before going ahead and buying it. They should look at other cloud options as well. If you are going to use mostly Microsoft products, then go with Azure. For non-Microsoft products, go with AWS.
I would rate Amazon AWS an eight out of ten.
We have migrated on-premises infrastructure for a customer to the AWS cloud with different workloads, such as Windows, Linux, Oracle, and SQL Server. It is a public and hybrid cloud deployment.
It has several valuable features, but the load balancer, auto-scaling, and RDS database are the main ones. It is a complete cloud infrastructure solution.
In terms of technical features, I don't see anything missing. The only two points in favor of other providers are the price and local support.
The main problem that we see here in Brazil is the price. It is much more expensive than any other cloud provider.
Their local support can also be better. We get more support from some of the other providers here in Brazil as compared to AWS.
It is very stable. There are no problems with its stability.
Its scalability is perfect and great. We have around 300 users.
Their technical support is okay, but it can be better. This is something for which there is room for improvement. We get more support from some of the other providers as compared to AWS.
It had medium complexity. It was not too complex, but it is never simple to migrate to the cloud. It took three months.
Several people were involved in its deployment. We had 13 people in total. There were about eight people from our side and maybe five people from the customer side.
It is much more expensive than any other cloud provider.
I would rate Amazon AWS a nine out of ten.
The services on offer are good.
I use the RDS a lot.
I've recently implemented more systems on Amazon. They integrate well with various other solutions.
Managing databases, and moving them from on-premises to the cloud is easy.
I need to read a bit more and figure out if the database configuration is off. I'm finding that the solution can sometimes be slow.
If I have a complex database on the OCI and try to move in AWS, for example, sometimes I can't do it. I'd like it to be easier if possible.
I'd like to see integration with MySQL.
I've been using the solution for two years.
I've worked with Azure and Oracle as well. A big part of our database is on Oracle OCI. It might be as much as 70%.
I can handle the implementation process. I've done a few lately.
We're a customer and an end-user.
I'd rate the solution at a seven out of ten.