We performed a comparison between AgilePoint and OpenText Documentum based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Camunda, Apache, Pega and others in Business Process Management (BPM)."The initial setup of AgilePoint was very easy."
"AgilePoint has improved our organization by making form implementation easier and to plan for future growth."
"AgilePoint's most valuable feature is process management."
"The solution's workflows are its most useful feature."
"I like the design and the integration capacity. It's also easy to use."
"OpenText Documentum's composition is good. It is convenient and straight out of the box."
"It stands out for its impressive records management capabilities and the ability to handle an extensive volume of documents, even reaching into the billions."
"The product is tamper-proof and enables us to return to the document source, which is helpful in legal issues."
"The tool's most valuable feature is ACL, which helps to control the user groups that access the documents."
"The most valuable feature is the management."
"The storage of metadata content, workflows, and life cycles are the most valuable features of OpenText Documentum."
"We primarily use it for storing documents. We host a variety of documents in OpenText Documentum. This includes raw files, analyzed files, and documents in multiple formats."
"It has reduced the amount of paper documents; reducing time and errors in the process."
"They should add more information about functionality."
"It could be more flexible, but it's already a good solution for the designer."
"The solution should be able to support Docker. This would help make scalability easier."
"Some issues with AgilePoint's design, AI and UX are some of the major problems we deal with when handling our company's business models or processes."
"While the platform is good and it has a lot of options, I would like to see more alternative features in future versions such as connectors to IDM. Currently, they have only ADFS and Okta."
"The product needs to improve the way documents are logged together. I believe running it on the cloud or containerization will bring value to it. The tool's Time to Market and deployment cycle need to be improved. Finding suitable training materials for OpenText Documentum is also a bottleneck. If we can find the training modules easily, we can bring together people, give them quick training, and start working on the deployment. It can help with quick outputs."
"The user interface can be a bit more intuitive."
"It's difficult to manage and customize Documentum."
"It needs a better UI and it should also be cloud-ready. The UI has not changed in years."
"OpenText Documentum needs to improve its support."
"An area that needs to improve is how to reduce storage space on the AWS site."
"The user interface can be improved."
"The main issue is the software's performance when storing around 10 million or more documents. It becomes slow and needs improvement. Perhaps it's a cloud-related issue, but it needs to be addressed. It could be due to our S3 bucket or something else. Nevertheless, this is a significant challenge we're facing."
AgilePoint is ranked 32nd in Business Process Management (BPM) with 5 reviews while OpenText Documentum is ranked 3rd in Enterprise Content Management with 26 reviews. AgilePoint is rated 8.0, while OpenText Documentum is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of AgilePoint writes " An affordable tool to create workflows requiring an easy initial setup phase". On the other hand, the top reviewer of OpenText Documentum writes "Saves time and increases an organization's productivity". AgilePoint is most compared with Microsoft Power Apps, Mendix, OutSystems, Nintex Process Platform and IBM BPM, whereas OpenText Documentum is most compared with OpenText Extended ECM, SharePoint, IBM FileNet, Hyland OnBase and Alfresco.
We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
