We performed a comparison between Appian and Bizagi based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Business Process Management (BPM) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Appian's most valuable feature is that we can create end-to-end process workflows with minimum turnaround."
"Appian's most valuable features are the quick time it takes to develop for the market. It's easy and faster than other BPM solutions."
"In terms of interface, it's very good. In terms of infrastructure, it's amazing and already using multiple tools behind the scenes. It's a low-code platform, so it's very easy to implement."
"Compared to other code tools that I've seen, Appian has a more robust rules engine"
"The solution has a lot of strong features for the financial industry, it is very easy to use."
"Technical support has been amazing overall."
"The most valuable features of Appian are the VPN engine, it is fast, lightweight, and easy to set up business rules. Business teams can do it by themselves. That is a very good feature."
"Appian helps you do a lot of things. It's easy to configure and build an application platform, and it offers a lot of features that you find in an RPA solution. It's flexible so you can reuse it for a variety of use cases."
"BPMN 2.0 compliance, while you model the processes, the system can detect your notation errors."
"The product enables the users to automate the processes and provides a good user experience."
"The ability to write our own code inside each activity is beneficial. Sometimes we need to create functionality that doesn't come out of the box, and this allows us to do that."
"The approval process is simple."
"Process management is easy with Bizagi; validating processes and assigning resources is straightforward."
"This is a free solution that allows us to create quality visualizations for our company."
"The product allowed users to connect with flow chart elements with ease."
"The natural notation is the best feature of Bizagi because it makes it compatible with other products."
"The product’s pricing could be improved from the developers' perspective."
"We would like to see more reduced latency. We would like to make sure that the scale-out factor will be much more as workloads come in."
"The biggest areas of improvement would be in facilitating team development, DevOps, and integration with typical tools used in enterprise development (Jenkins, Subversion, etc.)"
"There is no UI customization possible."
"One room for improvement is the ease of UI UX development, like in OutSystems and Mendix."
"It has it's own built-in UI components and doesn't provide much flexibility to customize or extend those components."
"One of the areas that Appian is working on is to improve its UI capabilities and give more flexibility to the UI."
"There should be more flexibility for the developers to choose the look and feel of the UI. They should have a better ability to design their widgets and customize them with different colors, shapes, and sizes. That is a limitation that could be improved upon."
"Sometimes, when your process is big with multiple lanes, the product will freeze the issue noticed on multiple laptops, not a single PC."
"In terms of what needs improvement, the costs can be lowered."
"It would be useful if we can connect Bizagi to other solutions, such as a local financial solution or Power BI. It would also be good and helpful to be able to connect Bizagi to some services solutions. It should also support right-to-left languages, such as Arabic."
"For the small business, this is very bad because it is still fragmented. The licensing policy should be more flexible and small company oriented. In micro-small companies, there should only be one or two. That's not the problem. Maybe it is too flexible, there are so many pieces that you need to put together. When you have a small business, it can be a little complicated, not so easy."
"The gateway through which it connects with other vendors, specifically RPA vendors, is one aspect that could be improved."
"We have migrated to the cloud, but there are a lot of issues while integrating with the cloud. There are a lot of things to improve with the cloud and reporting. We were previously working with on-premise solutions, and we had access to a lot of things, but with the cloud, they changed a lot of functionalities. Some of the things we know, but with some of the things, we are having difficulties."
"The tool is expensive and it should improve its pricing."
"The technical support is not fast enough and should be improved."
Appian is ranked 4th in Business Process Management (BPM) with 57 reviews while Bizagi is ranked 7th in Business Process Management (BPM) with 78 reviews. Appian is rated 8.4, while Bizagi is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Appian writes "Low resource consumption, easy setup, and stable". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Bizagi writes "A flexible, customizable solution that reduced time to market, but the UI and customer support could be better". Appian is most compared with Microsoft Power Apps, OutSystems, Camunda, ServiceNow and Oracle Application Express (APEX), whereas Bizagi is most compared with Camunda, Visio, Bonita, Microsoft Power Apps and SAP Signavio Process Manager. See our Appian vs. Bizagi report.
See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors, best Rapid Application Development Software vendors, and best Low-Code Development Platforms vendors.
We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
