We performed a comparison between ARIS BPA and Bonita based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Business Process Design solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."In general, the users really like it and they can get started using it very easily."
"ARIS has a good collaboration function. You create a portal where any authorized users can work on the models. There are simple flows for making and approving changes."
"Objects can be reused across different BPMNs and processes, so we can design new processes quicker and easier."
"The BPMN notation and the share flow through users. It is nice to see all flows in a common, shared space for all the stakeholders to view the same thing and the same language."
"you want to do modeling with the old notation form, ours was EPC, you can use the same object in the BPMN because the database is built in a way that you can use both things. So you only have to define it once, and if the notation form is BPMN and those kind of activities, you can use the same EPCs, so there is a connection between them."
"The stability of the ARIS BPM platform is quite good. The nice thing about it is the central database, where we can use all of our data. We can even manage users."
"There is a module designer, that one is very powerful and it creates very good reports."
"The EPC modeling is very detailed, the semantic check is helpful, and auto-layout simplifies the formatting."
"I find process management and user interface designing the most valuable features."
"The user interface is easy to use."
"Its user-friendliness, along with the availability of comprehensive and clear documentation on the website is the most valuable."
"It is a great product that is powerful in developing applications."
"The user interface is better than all of the open-source BPMs that I have tried."
"I really enjoy using the workflow management."
"The most valuable features of Bonita are the connectors, detailed documentation, and web applications. The documentation was useful because it is how I learned how to use it."
"One of the most valuable features is you can create without coding, it is a low code platform."
"In terms of improvement, the app could use some small details and functionalities."
"There are reports available in ARIS and you can modify them a bit if you want something more specific, but it's not that easy to adjust them and make modifications. It would be nice to have some kind of tool to do that, something that is more user-friendly for people who are not too technical, so that they could create reports the way they want them."
"Making it more customizable and easy to learn would be a benefit."
"I had this decentralization mission where I had some friendly fights with the consultants of Software AG. My opinion was the business department should be able to publish their processes and do all their evaluation stuff in ARCM themselves. It has to be a one stop shop. I want a one stop shop to go from ARIS BPM to ARIS ARCM, because having everything go through that would be an improvement due to the inputs that we made with Software AG. They will make it possible that the trigger sent from BPM to ARCM will start their object generation."
"There should be a more intuitive tool when creating reports."
"Since this is a design tool, seamless interface to make the process flows executable."
"It needs external API and the ability to navigate back, similar to "Back" in web browser."
"The governance mechanism could be better, as could automation."
"There is a need for more components in the library and additional customization options for these components."
"The main issue with Bonita is that the workspace crashes sometimes."
"Automation in vacation of a human resources replacement would be a good improvement in the product."
"I would like to improve the product's load balancing."
"The dashboard has limited features."
"Bonita can improve by offering more flexibility. The developer does not receive the code of the application to modify it. Most of the other solutions I have used allow the developers to change or improve the code that is generated."
"The interface is advanced and quite good, but it could improve."
"It is missing some important features that other products have."
ARIS BPA is ranked 3rd in Business Process Design with 64 reviews while Bonita is ranked 11th in Business Process Design with 27 reviews. ARIS BPA is rated 8.4, while Bonita is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of ARIS BPA writes "I can usually find an answer to my issue on ARIS Community". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Bonita writes "A simple and lightweight college course automation system with third-party integrations". ARIS BPA is most compared with SAP Signavio Process Manager, ADONIS, Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect, Camunda and Bizagi, whereas Bonita is most compared with Camunda, Bizagi, Apache Airflow, IBM BPM and Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect. See our ARIS BPA vs. Bonita report.
See our list of best Business Process Design vendors and best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.
We monitor all Business Process Design reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
Esperaba algo mas de este estilo, sin embargo desarrollé esta tabla de comparación de Suites BPM, la cuál no puedo anexar por lo que dejo en formato de texto en caso deque alguien requiera este conocimiento.
Esta tabla fue desarrollada basandome en textos acádemicos de fuentes confiables. Sin embargo no pude encontrar el numero aproximado de clientes que usan ARIS, por lo que si alguien cuenta con esta información se lo agradecería mucho, ya que es el último dato que requiero para completar esta tabla comparativa.
BizAgi Suite, Bonita BPM, IBM Suite, ARIS + Webmethods, AuraPortal, Oracle Suite, Appian eBPM HOPEX
Requiere pago Software licenciado (anual o perpetuo), freeware en versiones académicas Versión pagada (licenciamiento anual) y versión gratuita Software licenciado Software licenciado Software licenciado Versión pagada y versión gratuita Software licenciado Versión pagada y versión gratuita
Código abierto No Si (GPL) No No No No No No
Diseño intuitivo Bastante Intuitivo Bastante Intuitivo Medianamente intuitivo Bastante Intuitivo Bastante Intuitivo Requiere tiempo de adaptación Medianamente intuitivo Bastante Intuitivo
Acceso a licencia de prueba. Si No No Si Si No Si Si
Tutoriales y Soporte técnico Si Si Si Si Si Si Si Si
Notación para diagramar BPMN 2.0 BPMN 2.0 BPMN 2.0, BPEL BPMN 2.0, EPC BPMN 2.0 BPMN 2.0, BPEL BPMN 2.0, EPC BPMN 2.0
Compatibilidad con base de datos SQL Server, Oracle, MySQL SQL Server, PostgreSQL, MySQL, Oracle, HSQL SQL Server SQL Server, Oracle SQL Server Oracle SQL Server, Oracle, MySQL SQL Server, Oracle
Sistema operativo Windows, Linux Multi-plataforma Multi-plataforma Windows, Linux, Mac Windows Multi-plataforma Windows, Linux, Solaris Windows
Monitoreo en tiempo real Si Si Si No Si Si Si Regular
Servicio en la nube Si Si Si Si Si Si Si Si
Requiere programación No No Poco Poco No Si Poco No
Número de clientes >500 >1000 >3500 >800 >2000 >2000 >2700
Principales clientes Adidas Group, BBVA, Telefónica, BNP Paribas Xerox, Stanford University, CSC Barclays, Emericon, Banca popolare di Milano, Saperion Fujitsu, Coca Cola, Electrolux, ING, Credit Suisse Toyota, RSA Chile, Coprusa Group, Refinery of the Pacific REDISA, Panduit, Total E&P Indonesie Amazon, M&T Bank, Nissan, Ford, Baxter Credit Union GNP, P&G, EuroControl, British American Tobacco
Permite importar/exportar archivos BPMN Si Si Si Si Si Solo importación Si Si
Nivel de documentación Medio Alto Medio Alto Alto Medio Bajo Alto
Considera reglas de Negocio Si Si No Si Si No Si Si
Validación de Modelo (diagramas) Si Si Si Si No Si Si
Permite simulación Si Si Si Si Si Si Si No
Requiere conocimiento del producto Poco Poco Normal Poco Poco Normal Normal Poco
Año primera versión lanzada 1989 2001 1998 2009 2001 1997 1999 1994
Accesibilidad móvil Si Si Si Si Si Si Si No
Nivel de seguridad Regular Regular Regular Alto Alto Alto
Facilidad de instalación Sencilla Sencilla Sencilla Sencilla Sencilla Media Sencilla Media
Versión en español SI Si Si No Si Si No Si
Saludos.