Roberto TraballiIT Administrator Associate at RB CAPITAL
TonyMoorePresident at www.virtualtechsolutionsusa.com
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
"The technical support for the solution is excellent."
"If a device is stolen, you have the power to remove all of the contents remotely. You can do this very quickly."
"The containerization of the workspace is what we have found to be the most valuable."
"The stability of the solution is very good. It's reliable. We don't have crashes or experience freezing. There aren't bugs or glitches."
"I have found the location analytics feature that is built into the APs to be the most valuable. It allows you to compare data and to single out individuals who are repeatedly coming into your store. We can observe different trends. This is what separates it from a lot of the other solutions."
"More devices supported like iOS, Android, and API so it can support various platforms to enhance the experience."
"One fault that BlackBerry has is its salesforce. Their direct salesforce department is changing its salespeople constantly. One client I had, over a period of about three years, went through four salespeople. That continuity is a problem, in terms of dealing with the customers."
"It would be ideal if there was something for communication with Microsoft tools like Teams or Skype for Business, or perhaps even with Zoom for conference calls."
"The pain points for us would be the activation."
"We've really only experimented with their iOS client. This is due to the fact that their Windows client has a lot to be desired. We first tried experimenting with the Windows one but very quickly determined that it wasn't going to cut it for most Windows cases. The Windows portion of this product needs improvement. I'd say that it's not really viable."
"The cost of installing this solution can be more expensive depending on who is doing the installation. Cisco is very expensive, and I'd like to see a reduction in cost."
"We pay about $6 a year for the solution. There are no extra costs on top of that. You save a lot of money when you use this product."
"We currently pay by the year, but the licenses are calculated on a monthly basis."
"The cost of installing this solution can be more expensive depending on who is doing the installation. Cisco is very expensive."
The BlackBerry Enterprise Mobility Suite offers five editions to meet your enterprise’s evolving mobile needs. Growth can happen quickly, and the BlackBerry Enterprise Mobility Suite is designed to provide a seamless transition to the more advanced capabilities in higher-level editions. The subscription model ensures predictable annual expenditures and eliminates upfront capital costs.
Every user is unique. Every device, a bit different. Systems Manager keeps the network in the loop about constantly changing devices, automatically tracking device posture and adjusting security policies to match.
BlackBerry Enterprise Mobility Suite is ranked 11th in Enterprise Mobility Management (EMM) with 4 reviews while Cisco Meraki Systems Manager (MDM+EMM) is ranked 10th in Enterprise Mobility Management (EMM) with 2 reviews. BlackBerry Enterprise Mobility Suite is rated 8.6, while Cisco Meraki Systems Manager (MDM+EMM) is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of BlackBerry Enterprise Mobility Suite writes "Extremely scalable and quite stable with good technical support". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Cisco Meraki Systems Manager (MDM+EMM) writes "A stable and scalable solution that allows you to pre-configure the devices before you get them into the company". BlackBerry Enterprise Mobility Suite is most compared with Microsoft Intune, VMware Workspace ONE, MobileIron UEM, Jamf Pro and Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks, whereas Cisco Meraki Systems Manager (MDM+EMM) is most compared with Microsoft Intune, Jamf Pro, VMware Workspace ONE and ManageEngine Desktop Central. See our BlackBerry Enterprise Mobility Suite vs. Cisco Meraki Systems Manager (MDM+EMM) report.
See our list of best Enterprise Mobility Management (EMM) vendors.
We monitor all Enterprise Mobility Management (EMM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.