BMC TrueSight Operations Management vs Riverbed SteelCentral AppInternals

BMC TrueSight Operations Management is ranked 10th in Application Performance Management (APM) with 8 reviews vs Riverbed SteelCentral AppInternals which is ranked 13th in Application Performance Management (APM) with 4 reviews. The top reviewer of BMC TrueSight Operations Management writes "Before choosing this product, we evaluated other options, and we still do. Mainly, it ends in a mixture of tools, and using open source-based tools reporting up into it". The top reviewer of Riverbed SteelCentral AppInternals writes "We used to have another tool which wasn't as robust. One of our favorite features of AppInternals is the dashboards. ". BMC TrueSight Operations Management is most compared with AppDynamics APM, IBM Tivoli NetCool OMNIbus and SCOM. Riverbed SteelCentral AppInternals is most compared with AppDynamics APM, Dynatrace and New Relic APM. See our BMC TrueSight Operations Management vs Riverbed SteelCentral AppInternals report.
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
+Add products to compare
Most Helpful Review

Looking for a deeper dive into
Application Performance Management (APM)?

Bmc truesight operations management vs. riverbed steelcentral appinternals report from it central station 2018 05 04 thumbnailReport download mockup no thumb

Get key insights from the leading enterprise tech professionals in this detailed and easy to navigate report.

In order to provide you with this free report, we may share your details with up to 3 of our partners. By downloading this report, you agree to our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.

Quotes From Members Comparing BMC TrueSight Operations Management vs Riverbed SteelCentral AppInternals

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
Valuable features include wide support for monitoring, strong event management, service management capability, baselining (analytics) and easy to integrate other tools with it.It provides common administration, and a Single Sign-On Platform with RBAC, which eases the cross launch between multiple toolsThe tailoring of the knowledge modules has been particularly useful as I can streamline the agents to only report on critical events.It is very helpful to be able to apply rule-based routing to alerts.TSOM's ability to consolidate alerts into a single location and provide filtering of alerts is great.It has provided us with a single location to host all events to be viewed/monitored by our NOC. This has greatly helped them to streamline their processes.It allows our operations team to have one single application to reference when investigating issues in our environment.Signature baselines, which have allowed us to fine tune many of our events and significantly reduce the number of events generated.

Read more »

Transaction Tracing is the most useful. Being able to have the transaction stitched together so we can see where the problem is has proven invaluable.The capability of analysing each individual transaction captured to a very low level detail (method call/line of code).We just control on the backend of AppInternals what we want to instrument and what we don't want to instrument.The product is very useful to find problems in middleware for the application servers, especially agent instrumentation and management is user friendly.

Read more »

Cons
Deployment requires lots of resources (servers). It has too many consoles.The knowledge modules could be more lightweight in size. At present, the installation packages can be quite large.BMC's solutions for cloud monitoring (monitoring of AWS and Azure resources) are very poor in stability and customization.BMC's online documentation is often incorrect or incomplete.I would really like to see out-of-the-box support for monitoring uninterruptible power supplies.More modules for less popular applications and better documentation.I think the ease of deployment needs to be looked at. It would be great if the deployment was faster and easier.The sizing (which is difficult), the maintenance of it and the upgrade paths. This is a difficult area which is not easy to cover, as every client has a different approach of implementing the product.

Read more »

Support for PHP, DB and other applications need to be supported.They should find a way for report generation from TTW to run quicker.We have put in a request as an enhancement that we would like to search for items. If we're searching for a URL and we want to know was it a get or was it a post.The admin dashboard could be easier as it takes a little bit of time to get used to it.

Read more »

Pricing and Cost Advice
Pricing is very high.The solutions are not the cheapest but are robust and stable. License model is rather complex and BMC do often change the model.Use conservative figures. In terms of hardware, monitored servers and also effort. The product is not cheap. But as with other products, you get what you pay for.

Read more »

The licensing model for v9 is better where it is an individual license per server, while v10 licenses are per JVM/ .NET and server instance. The latter model appears to be the model that other APM vendors are using.The licensing model is expensive compared to its competitors, but the service it gives to your business, and the data quality, means that it's worth it.

Read more »

Looking for a deeper dive into
Application Performance Management (APM)?

Bmc truesight operations management vs. riverbed steelcentral appinternals report from it central station 2018 05 04 thumbnailReport download mockup no thumb

Get key insights from the leading enterprise tech professionals in this detailed and easy to navigate report.

In order to provide you with this free report, we may share your details with up to 3 of our partners. By downloading this report, you agree to our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.
Ranking
RANKING
Views
9,777
Comparisons
4,748
Reviews
8
Followers
936
Avg. Rating
8.0
Views
4,326
Comparisons
2,008
Reviews
6
Followers
621
Avg. Rating
8.8
Top Comparisons
Top ComparisonsSee more BMC TrueSight Operations Management competitors »See more Riverbed SteelCentral AppInternals competitors »
Also Known As
Also Known AsProactiveNet, TrueSight Operations ManagementSteelCentral AppInternals, OPNET ACE, AppInternals Xpert
Website/Video
Website/VideoBMC
  • Vendor 6954 screenshot 1524937453
Riverbed
  • Vendor 7898 screenshot 1524946891
OverviewQuestionmark icon
Overview

The BMCProactiveNet Performance Management Suite is made up of a number of essential components that will allow end-users to proactively manage their physical,virtual and cloud environments.

By combining capacity and performance analytics, ProactiveNet aligns IT enterprise and cloud systems to business demands, ultimately creating more intelligent and proactive business processes. ProactiveNet allows business needs and demands to be the driver of the IT system, and not the other way round, with the result being optimized resources, reduced risks and costs, and higher performance levels within the business.

Riverbed SteelCentral AppInternals, a software-based approach, offers full-stack visibility & insights into your apps both on and off the cloud. It continuously monitors with minimal overhead to give you end-to-end visibility and insights around-the-clock. With AppInternals you get: application performance insights that trace every transaction from user to back-end. Understand app dependencies, or expose and fix even the most hard-to-detect code, SQL, network or web services problems quickly, network & infrastructure diagnostics that continuously monitor your dynamic infrastructure. See their impact on your apps and vice versa. Resolve resource utilization and network-related errors before users are impacted and user experience & business insights that understand your users' satisfaction and trends in real-time. Identify your application's best and least used features, and quantify its financial impact on business results.

OFFER
Learn more about BMC TrueSight Operations Management
Learn more about Riverbed SteelCentral AppInternals
Sample Customers
Sample Customers Bank of East Asia and China E-Port. National Instruments, Allianz
Top IndustriesQuestionmark icon
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Financial Services Firm
32%
Insurance Company
12%
Comms Service Provider
11%
Manufacturing Company
9%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Comms Service Provider
32%
Healthcare Company
28%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Media Company
7%
Company SizeQuestionmark icon
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business
64%
Midsize Enterprise
9%
Large Enterprise
27%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business
20%
Midsize Enterprise
3%
Large Enterprise
77%
REVIEWERS
Midsize Enterprise
29%
Large Enterprise
71%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business
5%
Midsize Enterprise
20%
Large Enterprise
75%

Looking for a deeper dive into
Application Performance Management (APM)?

Bmc truesight operations management vs. riverbed steelcentral appinternals report from it central station 2018 05 04 thumbnailReport download mockup no thumb

Get key insights from the leading enterprise tech professionals in this detailed and easy to navigate report.

In order to provide you with this free report, we may share your details with up to 3 of our partners. By downloading this report, you agree to our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.
We monitor all Application Performance Management (APM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.

Sign Up with Email