We performed a comparison between Broadcom Clarity and JIRA Portfolio based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Project Management Software solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Absolutely, the most active community I have ever been on."
"I love the fact that it is very flexible. I am the lead engineer with enhancements, development, developing new portlets, anything that has to be added on, and integrating data, such as ETL processing."
"We are able to track budgets, and with timesheets, actuals against budgets."
"The most valuable features of Broadcom Clarity PPM are demand, project, and product management."
"The solution is technically fine and user friendly."
"It makes the whole lifecycle of project management a lot easier than using the legacy systems, which we are retiring every few months because of PPM."
"Being able to track all of the projects with all of the details of those projects, and being able to move projects along from a process perspective, that is really beneficial."
"It's pretty much the source of "the truth." Everything is together, everyone can see all the resources, financial projects, how long a project's going to take. Anybody can go in there and see any information they need about the organization as a whole."
"The dashboard is the most valuable feature. The user experience is very good, it's easy to use."
"Its stability is very reliable."
"The solution's tracking capabilities helped ensure we had full visibility into planned work and scheduled work."
"I use it to plan and schedule the things I take care of. I can create and share a document if I want to discuss new ideas with my team remotely."
"The best features of JIRA are its flexibility and configurability, allowing us to tailor it to our specific needs."
"The solution has good reporting and is very user-friendly."
"Jira's Structure, agile, and Kanban boards are helpful. I also like JQuery, which allows you to fetch the relevant set of data. We use JQuery, JQL, and the Structure board a lot. Kanban boards help us monitor daily tasks, and we review the progress using the burndown charts."
"The integration is very good. We've more or less integrated with everything including reporting and registering."
"One of the limitations would be mapping our current agile processes in the same tool set without obviously integrating to a different type of tool set within the same portfolio."
"I would like to see more team-based management, and less people-based management; as far as the resource management goes, to do it per team and not per person."
"The Work Breakdown Structure in the Tasks: I should be able to drag and drop to a level three instead of just stuck at level two."
"It would be good for them to work on the user interface to make it more interactive."
"I would like to be able to do time submission and time approvals on mobile rather than have to go in the system."
"they could improve the mobile app. I think right now it only offers time sheet. If they can integrate a lot of other components into it I think that would be helpful for the users."
"We use Service Desk Manager as well. We have a custom tool to integrate the two. One of the reasons why PPM was chosen was because, "Well, it must integrate with SDM, because they're the same company." But that was not the case."
"The architecture must be improved."
"The query features should improve in JIRA Portfolio. For example, if I would have to create my own queries for looking into something such as what business features we have released last month, or the last three months, I don't know if I can do it. The solution requires a certain level of expertise."
"This solution is not able to be integrated with other solutions because you have to upgrade it and pay for more licensing."
"JIRA Portfolio's configuration management could be improved."
"n the next version I would like to see better reporting and safer plugins, as well as easier scalability."
"The product could do with more flexible reporting."
"It would be nice if it could provide an end-to-end solution for a project."
"JIra is very poor at reporting."
"We are based in India; I would like the product to integrate local pricing. We earn in rupees but spend in dollars. Its pricing could also be lowered."
Broadcom Clarity is ranked 6th in Project Management Software with 136 reviews while JIRA Portfolio is ranked 4th in Enterprise Agile Planning Tools with 47 reviews. Broadcom Clarity is rated 8.0, while JIRA Portfolio is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Broadcom Clarity writes "A dynamic solution with a lot of great out-of-the-box calculations, but integration with reporting utilities is a bit painful". On the other hand, the top reviewer of JIRA Portfolio writes "Powerful, flexible solution with a bit of a learning curve". Broadcom Clarity is most compared with Microsoft Project, Jira, Planview Portfolios, ServiceNow Strategic Portfolio Management and Microsoft Project Server, whereas JIRA Portfolio is most compared with Jira Align, Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management, Microsoft Project Server, Adobe Workfront and Smartsheet. See our Broadcom Clarity vs. JIRA Portfolio report.
See our list of best Project Management Software vendors.
We monitor all Project Management Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.