We performed a comparison between ForgeRock and Keeper based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Auth0, Okta and others in Access Management."ForgeRock has CIAM, which other products didn't have, and they have DevOps ready."
"The support is good and prompt."
"We create and define the permissions and configurations for the users."
"The most valuable features of ForgeRock are social login and data protection."
"This is a stable solution. When you do experience any issues, you will see it in your DB logs or audit logs so you can easily reach a conclusion of might be causing it."
"The solution integrates well and it is important for them to keep up with the current trends in the market quickly enough, and they have been doing a good job at it."
"The product is easy to set up."
"I like the way it is handling authentication and authorization."
"It is very easy to use, intuitive, and cost effective."
"I can access my passwords from any Internet connected device."
"Password sharing and SSO. These features almost become a necessity to make sure that company data is safe and reduce the possibility of data breach."
"It saves us from duplicating passwords for different accounts."
"Keeper was user-friendly."
"It keeps my passwords organized and safe."
"Keeper Bridge."
"The chat support is quick. I have never encountered any problems. On the contrary, they have been very helpful and kind."
"The user interface could be improved as it is cumbersome and outdated. It doesn't have a responsive UI."
"The product's support services in the French language are not free."
"The only problem with ForgeRock is that it is derived from an open-source product, so sometimes it's a bit unstable."
"The identity management model needs a bit of improvement."
"The solution's documentation is not very good, and they do not give more details."
"We're worried about the scaling. We're told it will be okay and there won't be issues, however, I'm not 100% convinced."
"ForgeRock is an open source solution and is available to everyone but it is not freeware. If you need support, you need a subscription for ForgeRock. Many of its functionalities need to be built up with the help of a consultant."
"As with any complex software platform, there is a learning curve to using ForgeRock, and it may require specialized expertise to implement and manage effectively."
"Ability to store 'files' from IOS & Android devices. You can store pics from these devices currently. Most file formats can be uploaded from PC's/Macs"
"API possible needs improvement. Although, this feature is for enterprises which need more then the usual usage."
"Needs to improve KeeperFill on iOS."
"If you purchase the premium, then after the subscription expires, you cannot edit your passwords any longer, even if you could before you purchased the paid subscription."
"Needs to provide an API to be integrated with the information systems and offer secure file hosting service with sharing and editing capabilities."
"The organization of items needs improvement. For example, when I log onto the cloud version as well, everything is shown on my folder. It is hard to differentiate between files and documents in my list of items I have stored inside."
"The technical support has no experience."
"The stability of the solution can be improved."
ForgeRock is ranked 4th in Access Management with 27 reviews while Keeper is ranked 10th in Enterprise Password Managers with 32 reviews. ForgeRock is rated 8.0, while Keeper is rated 9.2. The top reviewer of ForgeRock writes "Governance and access management solution used for multi-factor authentication that is outdated with an unresponsive UI". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Keeper writes "It's an inexpensive, scalable solution that has improved our security". ForgeRock is most compared with SailPoint IdentityIQ, PingID, Microsoft Entra ID, Auth0 and Symantec Siteminder, whereas Keeper is most compared with HashiCorp Vault, CyberArk Privileged Access Manager, Azure Key Vault, LastPass and Delinea Secret Server.
We monitor all Access Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.