Hornbill Systems Supportworks vs SCSM comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Hornbill Systems Logo
168 views|133 comparisons
50% willing to recommend
Microsoft Logo
Read 23 SCSM reviews
1,474 views|806 comparisons
64% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Hornbill Systems Supportworks and SCSM based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about ServiceNow, Atlassian, BMC and others in Help Desk Software.
To learn more, read our detailed Help Desk Software Report (Updated: April 2024).
768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Anonymous User
Hossam Hussein
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The solution's business process flow is quite strong. Its reporting is quite good. The standard, basic ITSM functionality like call logging and call flow, for example, are areas the solution really excels in."

More Hornbill Systems Supportworks Pros →

"The most requested feature from our customers is the helpdesk ticketing system.""This solution is easy to use.""I've used SCSM a lot, and its features are valuable.""The most valuable feature is the reporting of incidents.""Many more features than other comparable products.""It is one of the most stable solutions in the market.""It is quite scalable.""The reporting is very good."

More SCSM Pros →

Cons
"It's worked well for us for a significant period of time. However, we are kind-of outgrowing it at the moment. We're struggling a bit with making it meet our requirements."

More Hornbill Systems Supportworks Cons →

"The solution could be more simple. For example, it takes a lot of work to create reports. It runs on Microsoft SQL queries. Creating custom reports on ManageEngine takes less work from the administrator.""It would be better if they had a portal for administrators. It would help me use it from anywhere and connect to any device from anywhere. I can administer the solution without a VPN.""I have found SCSM not adequate enough to carry out some functions.""Mobile application integration would be an improvement.""It would be good if Microsoft added custom attributes or tagging like in Jamf.""The product needs to improve its integration with other tools. It also needs to have a better UI and a simple dashboard.""Better integration with other services in Azure is needed because everything is moving from on-premises to the cloud, and as an integrator, we have to help our clients with the migration.""The patch management aspect of the solution should be improved. It's quite complicated and not user-friendly. If your systems are not patched properly, you are unable to pull reports."

More SCSM Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "Our organization pays about $40,000 annually. There are ongoing consultancy costs and if we want to change anything, we're charged a day rate. Other than that, there are no other extra costs involved in working with the solution."
  • More Hornbill Systems Supportworks Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "It is a lower price vs. other things on the market."
  • "It is an expensive solution."
  • "Licensing can be complex and confusing."
  • "The price should be lower."
  • "The price of the solution could be better. My organization has an enterprise annual license with Microsoft which provides us support."
  • "It comes free with the enterprise agreement that we have, but the expense really is in having to buy another product to sit on top of it to make it work properly. You wind up having to buy additional support and additional product with their own support and maintenance costs on top of that."
  • "The license for SCSM is cheap."
  • "I would rate the pricing as two out of five."
  • More SCSM Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Help Desk Software solutions are best for your needs.
    768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    Top Answer:The solution offers good productivity at a low price point.
    Top Answer:The solution offers good productivity at a low price point.
    Top Answer:For any weaknesses in the product, our company's security team maintains the application for our environment. The logs and reporting-related features of the product have certain shortcomings where… more »
    Ranking
    35th
    out of 59 in Help Desk Software
    Views
    168
    Comparisons
    133
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    14th
    out of 59 in Help Desk Software
    Views
    1,474
    Comparisons
    806
    Reviews
    8
    Average Words per Review
    517
    Rating
    8.0
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Supportworks
    System Center Service Manager
    Learn More
    Overview
    Supportworks brings you the ideal combination of business process automation, functionality and flexibility. It's a comprehensive ITIL-compatible application that satisfies most requirements out of the box. Fully integrated processes and support templates mean you can rapidly adopt key components of the service lifecycle. If you don't need all the disciplines immediately, just switch them off until you're ready. Supportworks has the flexibility to support any service desk requirement: HR and FM applications are available. which means you can run all your service desks on a single platform, eliminating duplicated effort, reducing hardware and software costs, and simplifying support.
    System Center Service Manager is a software product by Microsoft to allow organizations to manage incidents and problems. Microsoft states that the product is compliant with industry best practices such as the Microsoft Operations Framework (MOF) and in the Information Technology Infrastructure Library (ITIL). SCSM has integrated ITIL compliant fulfillment of service requests. Service requests are submitted by the end user in order to obtain information, access to a new application or the most common of all, password reset.
    Sample Customers
    Aylesbury Vale District Council
    Fibabanka, UMC Health System
    Top Industries
    No Data Available
    REVIEWERS
    Financial Services Firm20%
    Computer Software Company10%
    Hospitality Company10%
    Comms Service Provider10%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Government25%
    Computer Software Company10%
    Financial Services Firm9%
    Manufacturing Company9%
    Company Size
    No Data Available
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business38%
    Midsize Enterprise21%
    Large Enterprise42%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business14%
    Midsize Enterprise20%
    Large Enterprise65%
    Buyer's Guide
    Help Desk Software
    April 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about ServiceNow, Atlassian, BMC and others in Help Desk Software. Updated: April 2024.
    768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Hornbill Systems Supportworks is ranked 35th in Help Desk Software while SCSM is ranked 14th in Help Desk Software with 23 reviews. Hornbill Systems Supportworks is rated 7.0, while SCSM is rated 7.0. The top reviewer of Hornbill Systems Supportworks writes "Excels in call logging and call flows but is limited in terms of scalability". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SCSM writes "Helps us manage IT operations, including incident and service requests, but could be easier to create reports". Hornbill Systems Supportworks is most compared with ServiceNow, whereas SCSM is most compared with ServiceNow, ManageEngine ServiceDesk Plus, JIRA Service Management, BMC Helix ITSM and BeyondTrust Remote Support.

    See our list of best Help Desk Software vendors and best IT Service Management (ITSM) vendors.

    We monitor all Help Desk Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.