Compare IBM Rational Quality Manager vs. Inflectra SpiraTest

IBM Rational Quality Manager is ranked 17th in Test Management Tools with 1 review while Inflectra SpiraTest is ranked 15th in Test Management Tools with 1 review. IBM Rational Quality Manager is rated 8.0, while Inflectra SpiraTest is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of IBM Rational Quality Manager writes "Fast and reliable with good customization capabilities". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Inflectra SpiraTest writes "Has the ability to reuse test cases already used across projects so that we don't need to create new ones". IBM Rational Quality Manager is most compared with Micro Focus ALM Quality Center, Zephyr Enterprise and TFS, whereas Inflectra SpiraTest is most compared with TestRail by Gurock, JIRA and Tricentis qTest.
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Find out what your peers are saying about Micro Focus, Tricentis, Microsoft and others in Test Management Tools. Updated: February 2020.
399,230 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
It's very reliable as a solution.

Read more »

The ability to reuse test cases already used across projects is the most valuable feature of this solution. We don't need to create new ones.

Read more »

Cons
Currently, the user interface needs to be more user-friendly.

Read more »

It should develop integration with JIRA. We have some complexities which caused us not to decide to integrate it with our JIRA, like synchronous data.

Read more »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Test Management Tools solutions are best for your needs.
399,230 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
17th
Views
1,608
Comparisons
974
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Avg. Rating
N/A
15th
Views
1,560
Comparisons
945
Reviews
1
Average Words per Review
345
Avg. Rating
8.0
Top Comparisons
Compared 11% of the time.
Compared 19% of the time.
Also Known As
Rational Quality ManagerSpiraTest, Spira
Learn
IBM
Inflectra
Overview
IBM Rational Quality Manager is a collaborative hub for business-driven software and systems quality across virtually any platform and type of testing. This software helps teams share information seamlessly, use automation to accelerate project schedules and report on metrics for informed release decisions. Rational Quality Manager helps quality assurance teams collaborate by sharing project information and status updates seamlessly so team members can synchronize teamwork throughout the lifecycle. It helps them automate by reducing labor-intensive activities to accelerate project schedules. In addition, it helps them govern by understanding and reporting on project metrics enabling accurate, reliable and timely release decisions.SpiraTest is an integrated Requirements and Quality Management solution that manages your project's Requirements, Test Cases, Releases, Defects and Issues in one environment, with complete traceability throughout. After defining your project's requirements, you generate the test cases and test steps that validate the functionality. The test execution modules allows users to run through the tests, logging defects/issues as they go. SpiraTest is Fully Web-Based. Free 30-Day Trial.
Offer
Learn more about IBM Rational Quality Manager
Learn more about Inflectra SpiraTest
Sample Customers
Ehrhardt, Cisco Systems, Anadolu Hayat Emeklilik, CareCore National, Itaƒ BBA, Barr- Morningstar - Deutsch Bank - Sopra Group - Booz Allen & Hamilton - UBS - US Government
Find out what your peers are saying about Micro Focus, Tricentis, Microsoft and others in Test Management Tools. Updated: February 2020.
399,230 professionals have used our research since 2012.
We monitor all Test Management Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.