Compare Oracle Content and Experience Cloud vs. SharePoint

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, IBM, Box and others in Enterprise Content Management. Updated: February 2021.
465,058 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
"The pricing works for us.""For this type of solution, it is not wise to buy it without Software Assurance."

More SharePoint Pricing and Cost Advice »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Enterprise Content Management solutions are best for your needs.
465,058 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
Views
1,022
Comparisons
853
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Views
32,516
Comparisons
27,384
Reviews
12
Average Words per Review
451
Rating
7.6
Popular Comparisons
Also Known As
SharePoint 2007, SharePoint 2010
Learn More
Overview

Oracle Content and Experience Cloud is a cloud-based content hub to drive omni-channel content management and accelerate experience delivery.

SharePoint is a Microsoft-based platform for building web applications. It covers a widerange of capabilities and while it is appropriate for experienced webdevelopers, even non-technical minded users can easily navigate through thesystem and execute functions such as collaborating data, managing documents andfiles, creating websites, managing social networking solutions, and automatingworkflow.

Major areas that SharePoint deals with are websites,communities, content, search, insights, and composites. The purpose is to give usersthe ability to create or develop these key business components on their owneven without technical knowledge of, for example, how to build a website or howto integrate coding. Configuring SharePoint into a business's system is meantto cut out all of the complicated steps, and pave the way for easierimplementation all around.

Offer
Learn more about Oracle Content and Experience Cloud
Learn more about SharePoint
Sample Customers
Turning Point, Solairus Aviation, Redstone Content Solutions, Glesby Marks
Toyota, Aeroports de Paris, ASBBank Ltd., Barking, Havering and Redbridge University Hospitals, CambridgeshireConstabulary, D&M Group, NPL Construction Company, and The Regional Municipality of Niagara.
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company55%
Insurance Company18%
Comms Service Provider9%
Energy/Utilities Company3%
REVIEWERS
Financial Services Firm12%
Energy/Utilities Company10%
University10%
Comms Service Provider8%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company24%
Comms Service Provider15%
Government10%
Financial Services Firm5%
Company Size
No Data Available
REVIEWERS
Small Business38%
Midsize Enterprise21%
Large Enterprise41%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business4%
Midsize Enterprise26%
Large Enterprise70%
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, IBM, Box and others in Enterprise Content Management. Updated: February 2021.
465,058 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Oracle Content and Experience Cloud is ranked 17th in Enterprise Content Management while SharePoint is ranked 1st in Enterprise Content Management with 12 reviews. Oracle Content and Experience Cloud is rated 0.0, while SharePoint is rated 7.6. On the other hand, the top reviewer of SharePoint writes "Plan, plan, plan. Over-budget". Oracle Content and Experience Cloud is most compared with Oracle WebCenter, Adobe Experience Manager, Microsoft OneDrive and Box, whereas SharePoint is most compared with WordPress, Citrix ShareFile, Box, OpenText Content Suite Platform and OpenText Documentum.

See our list of best Enterprise Content Management vendors.

We monitor all Enterprise Content Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.