Compare RadView WebLOAD vs. Selenium HQ

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
RadView WebLOAD Logo
1,737 views|1,042 comparisons
Selenium HQ Logo
15,410 views|12,646 comparisons
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Micro Focus, Apache, Neotys and others in Performance Testing Tools. Updated: October 2020.
441,850 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
"The most valuable feature of this solution is reporting.""The most valuable aspect is that the IDE is simple and it's quick to complete the process."

More RadView WebLOAD Pros »

"The initial setup is straightforward. Deployment took about seven months.""You can build your own framework. I think that's the most powerful feature. You can connect with a lot of other tools that use frameworks, or keywords, etc. That helps make it a stronger solution.""The most valuable aspect of Selenium is that it gives you the flexibility to customize or write your own code, your own features, etc. It's not restricted by licensing.""The solution is very flexible; there are different ways of using it. It's open-source and has a lot of support on offer.""The most valuable feature is the Selenium grid, which allows us to run tests in parallel.""Ability to integrate with every other tool.""What I like the most about this product is that it gives us a lot of freedom to code anything, there is no restriction on the type of function you can do.""I like that it is a robust and free open source. There is a lot of community support available, and there are a lot of developers using them. There's good community support."

More Selenium HQ Pros »

Cons
"Technical support is slow and wastes a lot of time, so it needs to be improved.""The reporting side of things is really complicated. It's difficult to get out exactly what you're looking for, there are almost too many options."

More RadView WebLOAD Cons »

"Technical support isn't very good. Sometimes their recommendations were not very clear.""The solution is open-source, so everyone relies on the community to assist with troubleshooting and information sharing. If there's a complex issue no one has faced, it may take a while to solve the problem.""The solution's UI path needs to be modernized.""The solution does not offer up enough information in regards to personality testing.""I would like to see XPath made more reliable so that it can be used in all browsers.""Could have additional readability and abstraction.""Selenium is good when the team is really technical because Selenium does less built-in methods. If it came with more built-in and pre-built methods it would be even easier for less technical people to work with it. That's where I think the improvement can be.""There should be standardized frameworks to build automation."

More Selenium HQ Cons »

Pricing and Cost Advice
"We purchased a license for two years.""It costs $8,600 yearly and we have the Cloud, which is an additional $800. Our perpetual license is $800 and then the Cloud functionality with our 500 users is the $8,600."

More RadView WebLOAD Pricing and Cost Advice »

"We are satisfied with the pricing.""It's an open-source tool that you can work with at any time without any cost."

More Selenium HQ Pricing and Cost Advice »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Performance Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.
441,850 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Top Answer: The most valuable feature is the Selenium grid, which allows us to run tests in parallel.
Top Answer: The solution is open-source; you don't have to pay a licensing fee.
Top Answer: I would like to see XPath made more reliable so that it can be used in all browsers.
Ranking
13th
Views
1,737
Comparisons
1,042
Reviews
2
Average Words per Review
597
Avg. Rating
5.5
6th
Views
15,410
Comparisons
12,646
Reviews
9
Average Words per Review
441
Avg. Rating
7.6
Popular Comparisons
Compared 43% of the time.
Compared 18% of the time.
Compared 9% of the time.
Compared 14% of the time.
Compared 11% of the time.
Compared 9% of the time.
Compared 5% of the time.
Compared 5% of the time.
Also Known As
SeleniumHQ
Learn
Radview
Video Not Available
SeleniumHQ
Video Not Available
Overview

WebLOAD is an enterprise scale load testing product that powers the most demanding performance experts in the world. WebLOAD supports hundreds of technologies. DevOps teams will feel right at home with WebLOAD's flexible built-in scripting capabilities.

Selenium HQ is a suite of tools to automate web browsers across many platforms. Selenium runs in many browsers and operating systems and can be controlled by many programming languages and testing frameworks. Selenium consist of two types:

  1. Selenium WebDriver - create robust, browser-based regression automation suites & tests and scale & distribute scripts across many environments.
  2. Selenium IDE - create quick bug reproduction scripts and create scripts to aid in automation-aided exploratory testing.
Offer
Learn more about RadView WebLOAD
Learn more about Selenium HQ
Sample Customers
GoDaddy, Praxair, DeVry University and the College Board.BrowserStack, Sauce Labs, experitest, Tricentis GmbH, SmartBear Software
Top Industries
REVIEWERS
Financial Services Firm57%
Healthcare Company29%
University14%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company49%
Financial Services Firm14%
Comms Service Provider6%
K 12 Educational Company Or School6%
REVIEWERS
Financial Services Firm30%
Retailer17%
Computer Software Company13%
Comms Service Provider9%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company40%
Comms Service Provider11%
Financial Services Firm7%
Government6%
Find out what your peers are saying about Micro Focus, Apache, Neotys and others in Performance Testing Tools. Updated: October 2020.
441,850 professionals have used our research since 2012.
RadView WebLOAD is ranked 13th in Performance Testing Tools with 2 reviews while Selenium HQ is ranked 6th in Functional Testing Tools with 11 reviews. RadView WebLOAD is rated 5.6, while Selenium HQ is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of RadView WebLOAD writes "Good reporting, but the developers need the ability to write their own code ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Selenium HQ writes "Gives a lot of freedom to code anything, there is no restriction on the type of function you can do". RadView WebLOAD is most compared with Apache JMeter, Micro Focus LoadRunner Professional, Neotys NeoLoad and BlazeMeter, whereas Selenium HQ is most compared with Eggplant Functional, Tricentis Tosca, Worksoft Certify, Telerik Test Studio and Silk Test.

See our list of .

We monitor all Performance Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.