Compare ReadyAPI vs. Visual Studio Test Professional

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Most Helpful Review
Use Visual Studio Test Professional? Share your opinion.
Find out what your peers are saying about ReadyAPI vs. Visual Studio Test Professional and other solutions. Updated: September 2020.
441,726 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
"The interface is ok and they have the ability to re-load tests so that you can reuse them.""The dashboards are very good and consolidate all of the tests that you are performing with the client.""The most valuable feature of ReadyAPI is that it is user-friendly.""It has the ability to combine it with different CI/CD tools.""A single platform for functional testing, load testing security, and service actualization."

More ReadyAPI Pros »

"We are satisfied with technical support. Communicating with them is very simple. We also have a lot of online resources to check and to study and to train our team with. The documentation is very clear and readily available.""Code testing is the most valuable feature of this solution for developing software.""The setup is easy and straightforward.""The solution is very stable; there's nothing in relation to stability to complain about.""The most valuable features are the SSIS reports, the deployment models, and the ability to interact with other Microsoft tools.""The most valuable feature is the in-built support for C# and .NET projects.""Performance-wise, it is a great tool.""The most valuable features are tools like IntelliSense and ReSharper."

More Visual Studio Test Professional Pros »

Cons
"I would like to see a better dashboard for monitoring in the next release of this solution.""If ReadyAPI had more integration with all of the big tools on the market then this would be very useful.""Performance and memory management both need to be improved because other solutions use less memory for the same amount of data.""The performance in some cases needs improvement. Sometimes it requires too many resources.""Lacking flexibility of adding more custom verification for security testing."

More ReadyAPI Cons »

"The service right now is far too expensive. You need to pay per user.""Enhancing the support for web application testing and load performance would be an improvement.""The data flow can be improved.""The database administration could be better; you should be able to choose new tools with the development environment in Visual Studio. It could be easier to use.""The documents on the Microsoft website are not very useful, and they ought to make it easier to find answers.""We would like to be able to easily integrate this solution with our continuous integration tools, such as Jenkins.""The pricing of this solution should be lowered.""The integration with Git needs improving because it is a bit disjointed and unpredictable."

More Visual Studio Test Professional Cons »

Pricing and Cost Advice
"This is a cheap solution when you consider the money that will be saved in testing."

More ReadyAPI Pricing and Cost Advice »

"For the cloud services option, you buy a subscription per account or per user. This costs around $52 a month per person.""I think that the pricing is quite good."

More Visual Studio Test Professional Pricing and Cost Advice »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Functional Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.
441,726 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer: It has the ability to combine it with different CI/CD tools.
Top Answer: The performance in some cases needs improvement. Sometimes it requires too many resources.
Top Answer: Our primary use case of this solution is to test services to have an understanding of what the request to the service should be and the response. We also use it for performance tests.
Top Answer: The most valuable features are tools like IntelliSense and ReSharper.
Top Answer: The integration with Git needs improving because it is a bit disjointed and unpredictable. The diagrammatic representation of the database in the entity framework is helpful but it seems to have been… more »
Ranking
11th
Views
4,784
Comparisons
3,657
Reviews
5
Average Words per Review
461
Avg. Rating
8.2
9th
Views
3,597
Comparisons
2,928
Reviews
8
Average Words per Review
392
Avg. Rating
8.6
Popular Comparisons
Compared 75% of the time.
Compared 10% of the time.
Compared 4% of the time.
Compared 3% of the time.
Compared 2% of the time.
Also Known As
Ready API
Learn
SmartBear
Microsoft
Overview

ReadyAPI combines the power of SoapUI Pro, LoadUI Pro, ServiceV, and API Monitoring in AlertSite into a single pane of glass. From functional testing, to performance testing to post-deployment monitoring, SmartBear’s API tools help you to deliver accurate, fast, and secure APIs.

Visual Studio Professional Edition provides an IDE for all supported development languages. As of Visual Studio 2010, the Standard edition was dropped. MSDN support is available as MSDN Essentials or the full MSDN library depending on licensing. It supports XML and XSLT editing, and can create deployment packages that only use ClickOnce and MSI. It includes tools like Server Explorer and integration with Microsoft SQL Server also. Windows Mobile development support was included in Visual Studio 2005 Standard, however, with Visual Studio 2008, it is only available in Professional and higher editions. Windows Phone 7 development support was added to all editions in Visual Studio 2010. Development for Windows Mobile is no longer supported in Visual Studio 2010; it is superseded by Windows Phone 7.
Offer
Learn more about ReadyAPI
Learn more about Visual Studio Test Professional
Sample Customers
Healthcare Data Solutions (HDS)Transport for Greater Manchester, Ordina, Bluegarden A/S, CLEAResult, Jet.com, OSIsoft, Australian Taxation Office, BookedOut, Tracasa
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company42%
Comms Service Provider12%
Insurance Company8%
K 12 Educational Company Or School5%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company51%
Comms Service Provider13%
Media Company7%
Insurance Company6%
Find out what your peers are saying about ReadyAPI vs. Visual Studio Test Professional and other solutions. Updated: September 2020.
441,726 professionals have used our research since 2012.
ReadyAPI is ranked 11th in Functional Testing Tools with 5 reviews while Visual Studio Test Professional is ranked 9th in Functional Testing Tools with 8 reviews. ReadyAPI is rated 8.2, while Visual Studio Test Professional is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of ReadyAPI writes " A great single platform for functional testing, load testing security, and service actualization". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Visual Studio Test Professional writes "Good integration between the management data and the test cases". ReadyAPI is most compared with SoapUI Pro, Apache JMeter, Katalon Studio, BlazeMeter and Tricentis Tosca, whereas Visual Studio Test Professional is most compared with Apache JMeter, TFS, Micro Focus LoadRunner Professional, Katalon Studio and Ranorex Studio. See our ReadyAPI vs. Visual Studio Test Professional report.

See our list of best Functional Testing Tools vendors.

We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.