We performed a comparison between ReadyAPI and Worksoft Certify based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Functional Testing Tools solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."I haven't seen any other tool that offers both types of tests. This is very helpful for us, and it's one of the main reasons why we chose this service."
"A single platform for functional testing, load testing security, and service actualization."
"It's easy to learn how to use it."
"The feature that allows you to import an API collection or a project is valuable."
"The most valuable feature has been the assertion as a test step as this has allowed us to increase the scope of testing and validation."
"The two most valuable features we use are the functional test and the security test."
"The dashboards are very good and consolidate all of the tests that you are performing with the client."
"Reporting is more robust than other products because test reports can be exported in multiple ways."
"What I like about Worksoft Certify is that end-to-end testing becomes faster."
"The Capture 2.0 feature is very intuitive, useful, and user-friendly. You can do so much with it now, versus the older version."
"The most valuable feature is the ability to automate quickly and to maintain and update scripts."
"For this SAP upgrade or implementation, the business users are creating building blocks in their areas, then they're changing the building blocks into long end-to-end scripts to do a complete end-to-end testing to speed up the UAT. It definitely has a bigger coverage of UAT testing."
"The ability to work with the data, with recordsets, and plug those into the scripts is very easy and very powerful. We use it extensively."
"We prefer Worksoft over other platforms because it's a low-code solution"
"Worksoft Certify supports multiple interfaces and applications like SAP, Web, or Silverlight Java, and Mainframe. It is easily integrated."
"Automation using Worksoft Certify has saved our testing times by 40% to 50%."
"I would like to see a better dashboard for monitoring in the next release of this solution."
"The UI is not user-friendly."
"Version control does not work well."
"Lacking flexibility of adding more custom verification for security testing."
"The performance in some cases needs improvement. Sometimes it requires too many resources."
"What needs improvement in ReadyAPI is its load testing feature because there was a hiccup when my team performed some load testing on the tool. My team had meetings with the ReadyAPI team and tried to get that issue fixed, but it still hasn't improved. This is a shortcoming of the tool, especially when you compare it with HP LoadRunner."
"The initial setup could be less complex."
"Can be improved by including an inherent feature for UI automation."
"The problem with Worksoft Certify is that it's not always stable. It runs on a live platform that's constantly changing, so the test script needs to be adjusted every time, which is very painful."
"An area that I would like to see improved is how the permissions are applied. If you're applying permissions groups to a user, one of the options is to delete the group entirely and lose the entire permission group, rather than just deleting the permission from the user, which seems a little silly. In my opinion, that whole module of permissions is very confusing and lends itself to common errors."
"The definitions for the objects need to be automated. They need to be recognized automatically by Worksoft Certify instead of changing them back and forth manually. This is also something that Worksoft is currently working on."
"Better automation capability would be helpful."
"Certify is integrated with Solution Manager, but this integration could be easier."
"Web UI testing was difficult in the beginning, as we had a homegrown product, and we had to do the proper object naming."
"I would like to see the impact analysis integrated with the performance testing tool. We have multiple tools doing multiple items. I would like to have one common tool."
"Worksoft Certify needs improvement on customization of reporting and how you report final outcomes."
ReadyAPI is ranked 8th in Functional Testing Tools with 33 reviews while Worksoft Certify is ranked 6th in Functional Testing Tools with 64 reviews. ReadyAPI is rated 7.6, while Worksoft Certify is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of ReadyAPI writes "Allows you to parameterize in one place for the changes to reflect everywhere and lets you customize the environment, but its load testing feature needs improvement, and costs need to be cheaper". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Worksoft Certify writes "Enables us to automate end-to-end testing of our integration between S/4HANA and Salesforce.com". ReadyAPI is most compared with Apache JMeter, Katalon Studio, ReadyAPI Test, Tricentis Tosca and SmartBear TestComplete, whereas Worksoft Certify is most compared with Tricentis Tosca, Selenium HQ, OpenText UFT One, Katalon Studio and Panaya Test Dynamix. See our ReadyAPI vs. Worksoft Certify report.
See our list of best Functional Testing Tools vendors.
We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
