We performed a comparison between Cegid and SAP SuccessFactors based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Talent Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The solution has a great payroll engine."
"The most valuable features of Meta4 are payroll and resource recruitment. However, all of the features in the human resource system are useful."
"The tool provides a lot of options."
"The performance appraisal is the most valuable feature."
"The most valuable feature of this solution is the payment engine."
"The support team were friendly and work in a systematic way. When contacting support you are able to add a level of priority to your case which is always respected by their team."
"The most valuable feature is you can customize every type of payroll calculation that you have."
"Performance appraisal might be the most valuable feature for us."
"We use the cloud version to maintain all the employee records, payroll, etc. We use everything that comes with the HR suite."
"SuccessFactors' best features are talent management and HR Analytics."
"What I like the most is the KPI management formula."
"The most valuable features of SAP SuccessFactors are onboarding, recruiting, marketing, and performance."
"This solution is very user-friendly, and supports 60 plus languages."
"Currently, we are using the performance and goals management functionality the most. It is connected with the enterprise solution, and it is seamless. It can be easily accessed because it is available via the net. It is readily available, provided you have an internet connection. Their technical support is also very good."
"SAP SuccessFactors is a stable solution."
"The most important feature is the ability to follow up on the yearly performance of the team. It's very good for management to understand how people are performing."
"Meta4 could improve by allowing users to manage things by themself."
"In future releases, it would be useful to see reporting lines of all the team members in our business to understand who reports to whom."
"training and performance could be improved."
"The HR portal, training model, and the development career model all need improvement."
"The solution is a little bit slow."
"The user interface could be improved and the maintenance is complex when it comes to upgrades."
"The HR portal, training model, and development career model could all use improvement. Stability and scalability should be improved as well."
"I would like to have recruitment and acquisition features added to this solution."
"We lack information regarding how to build a network."
"The stability could be a bit better."
"The integration between the recruitment module and employee central is a big problem."
"The initial setup could be simplified."
"There is room for improvement in licensing model."
"SAP SuccessFactors can improve the recruitment module and artificial intelligence features. More powerful analytics are needed."
"It is not that user-friendly. It can be made more user-friendly."
"SuccessFactors' experience management is not so user-friendly."
Cegid is ranked 24th in Talent Management with 12 reviews while SAP SuccessFactors is ranked 1st in Talent Management with 90 reviews. Cegid is rated 7.2, while SAP SuccessFactors is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of Cegid writes "Facilitates reusability, loads massive data, and creates reports". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SAP SuccessFactors writes "Offers many useful modules and integrations, and helps companies adhere to best practices". Cegid is most compared with SAP HCM, Workday, UKG and BambooHR, whereas SAP SuccessFactors is most compared with SAP HCM, Workday, Oracle HCM Cloud, PeopleSoft and UKG. See our Cegid vs. SAP SuccessFactors report.
See our list of best Talent Management vendors and best Cloud HCM vendors.
We monitor all Talent Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.