Anonymous UserManaging Director at a computer software company
Anonymous UserChief Executive Officer at a manufacturing company
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
"Talent Acquisition and Learning features are best in class."
"We use the cloud version to maintain all the employee records, payroll, etc. We use everything that comes with the HR suite."
"The best features that were working well for us was the Goal Management and Performance Management. They were the most valuable to our organization."
"It's brought to our organization a big big improvement. We would give it a good rating."
"The interface is really useful and it's very easy to combine different information. For example, we can easily get reports that we need. It's very easy to create reports."
"The most important feature is the ability to follow up on the yearly performance of the team. It's very good for management to understand how people are performing."
"The interface is user-friendly. It is very simple and intuitive, so it's good."
"The most valuable feature of this solution is the performance management module."
"The solution has improved our organization by helping us cut hours and lessen our labor force. It saved us probably over $100,000 in just the last couple of years."
"The Reporting/Analytics and User Interface need improvement."
"Analytics could use some work."
"They should improve the reports."
"We have many interruptions and disconnection points into processes, which is why we are looking to another solution. We are not so happy with the system. We believe we have in the market better solution, so we are looking for alternatives but so far the system has been used a lot."
"Some of the screens aren't that user-friendly, older employees especially have a hard time with it. They have some problems with it."
"LMS, Learning Management Systems, needs improvement because there were some stability problems."
"There should be more connectivity with other systems."
"The GUI needs to be enhanced to be in line with the latest and complete version of the solution."
"The solution could use better reporting with standard reports. We use the Cognos platform in BI for a lot of our reporting. However, they need to have more robust standard reporting available to their user base."
"The licensing fees are based on the number of modules that are being used, and the number of users."
"I don't want to comment on the license cost, to be honest. It could be about $1,000 approximately per customer. However, it's very flexible in terms of the licensing costs depending on the volume and depending on the deal of installation."
"If you go by best practices and do it right from the outset, the setup won't be a costly endeavor. In terms of setup, there is a lot of flexibility compared to three years ago."
"It could be cheaper."
At UKG, our purpose is people — real people with real challenges, and a simple request. Help me keep my employees productive, connected, and happy. So that’s what we did.
We’ve created an unmatched suite of HR and workforce management solutions, backed by our people who care about yours. Our solutions deliver global workforce experiences that truly reflect the connection between life and work today. That means insights are deeper. Work is easier. And interactions are more meaningful.
SAP SuccessFactors is ranked 2nd in Talent Management with 21 reviews while UKG is ranked 7th in Talent Management with 1 review. SAP SuccessFactors is rated 8.0, while UKG is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of SAP SuccessFactors writes "Highly flexible and gives full visibility into our workforce management processes". On the other hand, the top reviewer of UKG writes "Easy to use with good integration capabilities and excellent at streamlining protocols". SAP SuccessFactors is most compared with SAP HCM, Workday, Oracle HCM Cloud, PeopleSoft and Meta4, whereas UKG is most compared with Workday, Ceridian Dayforce HCM, ADP Workforce Now, SAP HCM and PeopleSoft.
We monitor all Talent Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.