The product is expensive. The open-source version is free, but small companies would not be able to afford the cloud-based version. I rate the pricing an eight out of ten. Additionally, we have to pay for the product’s support.

Jenkins is open-source.

It is an open source.

Jenkins is an open-source tool.

The solution is open source.

Jenkins is completely open source. 

Jenkins is an open-source platform.

In our company, we do pay for the licensing of the solution.

Licensing is not my domain. I can't speak to the exact costs. 

Jenkins is open-source, so it is free.

One good thing about Jenkins is there are two flavors. One is open-source and the other is the commercial or the enterprise edition. The open-source version is pretty stable. For the security concern, you can add your own security-related intervention to make it that much more secure.

For the enterprise edition, you have a cloud-based which actually provides the commercial Jenkins version. Apart from security, they have come up with upgraded versions of Jenkins, for example, Jenkins Access Control and Jenkins Two-point Access Control. You can get added all kinds of features and the ease of implementing or managing your product. As I mentioned, Jenkins open-source is actually more stable and mature if you compare it to the enterprise version.

Jenkins is a free open-source server.

This is an open-source solution for the basic features. However, if an organization wishes to include specific functionality, outside of the basic package, there are extra costs involved.

We use the tool's free version. 

The solution is open-source. 

We are using the free version of Jenkins. There are no costs or licensing.

I understand that the licensing is renewed about once a year. The pricing itself is fine. I wouldn't describe it as being overly expensive.

This is not open source. It's price-based, for example, premium-based.  

I'm not sure of the exact pricing of the product. My understanding is that it is not very expensive. It's an open-source tool. They do also have an enterprise version, which is what we use. It's the same tool whichever you use, however, with enterprise, you get support.

We use the open source solution.

Jenkins is an open-source product, but you have the option to buy an enterprise license.

We use the tool's open-source version which is free. There is an enterprise version which is expensive but comes with better support. 

Jenkins is open source.

Jenkins is not expensive and reasonably priced.

Jenkins has a free licensing program.

The original setup. for us, was the cost of a new Mac Mini box which costs, from $1,000 to $2,000 depending on the configuration.

We have a license contract with Jenkins. 

It is a cheap solution. 

We used the free version. We didn't need anything specific on the support side for that. It's totally customizable, and if you get so much good out of an open-source project, then you don't need to go for any support model. That was quite good, and community support has been good enough for us.

The setup of Jenkins takes a lot of time. Having faster deployment would be helpful.

The product is open-source.

We are using the free version of Jenkins. There is not a license required to use the solution because it is open-source.

We are using the freeware version of Jenkins.

Free. Takes some work hours of course, but those come back many fold in improved productivity through automation.

I believe it's good value.

No setup/;day to day costs.

There is no cost. It is open source.

Jenkins is a free solution, it is open source.

It's free. There's no advice required

I used the free OSS version all the time. It was enough for all my needs.

It could be cheaper because there are many solutions available in the market. We are paying yearly.

The solution is one of the lowest costs compared to competitors.

Jenkins is open source and free.

My colleagues and I did the setup, so only the hours we spent doing it.

Some of the add-ons are too expensive.

It is a free product.

It's free.

It is free.