Microsoft Azure Logic Apps Room for Improvement
In terms of improvement, it would be helpful to have more descriptive documentation. Since we work in a hybrid cloud model with Azure, AWS, and Oracle, there are instances where we need to interact between different platforms, like Oracle to AWS features, Oracle to Azure, or Azure to Oracle. In such cases, the information available is often limited, and we need to refer to different documentation sources like Azure's API documents or others.
It would be beneficial to have scenario-based documentation that helps us understand the integration process more easily. For example, one of my team members had to work on integrating with Azure Blob for data storage. We had to call the Azure REST APIs for that, but the documentation was not clear, making it a bit complicated. We tried multiple REST services, performed trial and error, and eventually got it working. However, having a proper and detailed explanation document would have made it much smoother. Instead of providing everything in one place, having some standard use case documents would be helpful.
View full review »The standard logic app could be simplified. Thats what we would like to see in the next release.
The visual tool that is used to build integration is quite old. It’s really hard to see all the different models at the same time. It must be modernized, and better support must be provided for the visual tool. The tool must provide support for OpenAPI. We create connectors out of some OpenAPI documentation, but they are really old versions.
Buyer's Guide
Microsoft Azure Logic Apps
April 2024
![PeerSpot Buyer's Guide](https://www.peerspot.com/images/peerspot_logo_lt.png)
Learn what your peers think about Microsoft Azure Logic Apps. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: April 2024.
768,857 professionals have used our research since 2012.
The solution could add an AI version to make it easier for people. Microsoft is deploying Copilot across all the platforms like Microsoft 365, Teams, Word, Excel, PowerPoint, and everything. Azure can also add Copilot to the product to make it easier for developers.
View full review »The solution must generate more templates. Pre-defined templates would make automation easy for engineers. There must be a separate portal for Logic Apps. It must provide features like drag and drop and image import. It would be helpful if the vendor could provide more data connectors.
View full review »There are two challenges. First, it's a bit costly at the end of the day. It's difficult to calculate pricing, and that affects the business. That's one challenge.
Second, it's asynchronous. So, getting a development team to work on it, making it function properly, is a challenge. Salespeople often have this new notion of sequential programming, so they don't fully understand how it can be used in a disconnected or asynchronous mode. It's difficult for them. It's challenging. In terms of analytics and navigation, using all these modern architectures, it's there, and it works nicely. But if somebody is using a legacy application or needs to make an extension, then it becomes difficult because those applications don't really support asynchronous processes, especially building applications this way. It's challenging to sell those things.
So, pricing and handling asynchronous processes are the two main areas that need improvement.
The primary challenge is handling the costs, especially the difficulty in providing precise, concrete numbers to the business. This becomes a significant issue because we can't predict what kind of processes will be required. Once you invest, there are various variables in the market, such as manufacturing, and once you get connected, you need a connector, which often comes at an additional premium cost. Every business is sensitive to this aspect.
Sorting out the licensing is very complex, particularly when using multiple services. For example, if you want to use Power Apps, Logic Apps, SharePoint, and other services, things become complex and confusing. You can't go to the business and provide a clear budget because businesses prefer a specific number they can allocate. However, it's challenging to provide precise, point-to-point cost estimates because there isn't much detailed information available online. The cost estimates are often high-level.
Here is an example. We are building a chatbot, and one part of it is based on the number of requests. We're a company with 7,000 employees. If the chatbot becomes successful, we could have 100 questions or even 20 to 30 interactions per day per user. However, if it's not successful, it might drop down to just 1 to 2 interactions per day from 20 to 30. The cost variation is so significant that it's challenging to present a consistent cost to the business. It could range from ten thousand dollars per month to maybe just one thousand dollars. The range is hard to explain, and in reality, we don't know. And then there are hidden costs. When you try to connect to something, you suddenly realize it's also license-based, user-based, like seven engineers not using it. The price can increase unexpectedly from a couple of hundred dollars to maybe a few thousand dollars per month or even more. This complexity is causing people to avoid using it.
If Logic Apps could be built-in as part of Azure Functions, it would be better. We don't need to use it for every case, only for special cases. However, Logic Apps require writing more logic and are more critical in terms of performance.
It's not a useful tool. When I use it for bigger cases, I don't think it's much faster. The main issue is performance, especially when dealing with large amounts of data. Performance-wise, that's the only thing Microsoft should focus on.
View full review »SS
SiddharthShanakr
IT Analyst. at a tech services company with 1,001-5,000 employees
The scalability could be improved.
View full review »VM
Vineeth Marar
Cloud solution architect at 0
An area of improvement I've encountered is related to the number of connectors available in Logic Apps. While there are many connectors, I found that the "send email" connector may not work as expected, and one has to rely on Office 365 plugins or other alternatives. This could enhance user experience, especially when considering the additional overhead and licensing requirements associated with Office 365. It also needs to improve security features.
View full review »A room for improvement in Microsoft Azure Logic Apps is that it's expensive. Every step is going to cost you money, so if someone is not doing the steps carefully, at the end of the day, it will cost a lot of money. Each time you execute a step, the cost will depend on how much you use Microsoft Azure Logic Apps, and how many workflow steps you have. Each time a step needs to be executed, there'll be a cost added to your bill. If the developer isn't careful with how he uses the solution, this can blow up the cost.
What I'd like to see in the next release of Microsoft Azure Logic Apps is for the cost and security to be better.
View full review »Not all connectors are readily available, though. There are two types: managed connectors and app connectors. Some connectors require you to provide a username and password to connect to platforms like SharePoint or Salesforce. Due to security constraints, some users may prefer not to use these connectors. Instead, they might opt for the HTTP connector. However, tracking can be a bit challenging. In production, the run history might not be accessible due to security restrictions.
View full review »There could be more AI features included in the product.
View full review »SR
reviewer2079927
Owner & Senior Azure Developer at a tech services company with 1-10 employees
It has a lot of integrations, which are quite easy to understand mostly. However, especially when using a function or a parameter, that could be easier as that's not very well-documented, and it's not very clear from the tool itself how to use it. When using parameters or functions, it gets a bit tricky.
View full review »I'd like to see more connectors available as well as a more advanced development environment.
KD
Kamal Dua
Sr. Specialist Process at Delphime
Additional features or extensions could potentially be integrated with Logic Apps.
View full review »HT
Harish Thakur
Head Of DevOps at Kantar
It's a skill that must be learned. I find the current interface useful, but I could see how others would want the UI bits that are used for creating Logic Apps to be simplified.
View full review »The solution can integrate with different ETL tools. It can integrate with Azure Data Factory and a more open connecter.
View full review »Microsoft Azure Logic Apps could have more customization options for connectors.
View full review »PW
Paweł Wielgus
Contract Software Engineer at Stermedia
The documentation could be better. I think that's the only thing that was causing a normal level of problems. In terms of the documentation, it came from Cosmos DB and an additional product from Microsoft Azure.
The only thing is, sometimes, when we need a specific connector, it requires an enterprise or paid version. If it were possible to provide the most commonly used connectors for pulling data from different sources free of cost, that would be really nice.
For every connector, we have to pay. The cost factor is a problem. For every good connector, we're paying twice – once for the SQL Server connector and again for other data source connectors. It would be concerning if I had to pay for every connector I need. Microsoft can do something about that.
View full review »The pricing could be improved.
View full review »YS
Youssef Samir
Cloud Solution Architect at KlayyTech
I would like the ability to add more features or to become more of a designer first or to be a declarative type of environment.
Doing more with Logic Apps through the portal with less code or less script being written would be ideal.
It would be beneficial to have less code and tighter integration between different cloud services.
View full review »DF
reviewer1482360
Solution Architect at a energy/utilities company with 1,001-5,000 employees
The solution is not user friendly. In the beginning, the solution is easy to use and works fine but when you are doing more advanced tasks it then becomes more difficult.
View full review »WS
reviewer2300043
Technical Architect at a computer software company with 1,001-5,000 employees
JK
reviewer2226699
Practice Lead Microsoft Power Platform at a tech services company with 11-50 employees
There could be custom code for the product's components. We should be able to create a customized solution tailored to specific needs. Currently, it takes too long to find out the components.
View full review »CK
Cristina Kluger
Head Of Development at Aleman Software Group
The product needs improvement in getting direct access to the code and versioning.
View full review »Microsoft Azure Logic Apps can improve by continually updating the connectors to make them better.
In a feature release, they should add a designer interface in the advanced settings.
View full review »Buyer's Guide
Microsoft Azure Logic Apps
April 2024
![PeerSpot Buyer's Guide](https://www.peerspot.com/images/peerspot_logo_lt.png)
Learn what your peers think about Microsoft Azure Logic Apps. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: April 2024.
768,857 professionals have used our research since 2012.