The solution is good and stable for my use cases so I rate stability a six out of ten. 

The solution is stable. 

For the scenarios we have chosen, it's ranked as stable. We also made what we call disaster recovery scenarios to be able to replicate MongoDB content after failures. So far, it's been very good. It's fast.

The solution is pretty stable with no issues. 

Stability-wise, I rate the solution an eight out of ten.

MongoDB is stable. It has been more stable in the cloud than what we experienced when we used it on-premise.

It is stable.

The solution is stable.

This is a stable solution and we are happy with it.

MongoDB is solidly stable. 

The solution is stable. However, I recall instances when the database crashed due to high-volume querying, but this can occur with any database if the queries being run are not optimized for the particular instance.

I rate the stability of MongoDB an eight out of ten.

It is highly stable. I would rate it nine out of ten.

MongoDB is a very stable solution. The solution is a leader, according to the Gartner report.

The stability of MongoDB is good.

I rate the platform's stability a nine out of ten.

It is a stable solution. Stability-wise, I rate the solution a nine out of ten.

MongoDB is a stable solution.

MongoDB isn't stable like Oracle, but it's okay.

My impression is that this is a stable product.

MongoDB's stability is very good.

MongoDB is stable and reliable.

The solution is stable. 

MongoDB is stable. 

It is stable.

We have not had any issues with stability.

Sometimes you have multiple requests at the same time and there are thousands of millions of data points. There may be performance issues in that case. Sometimes it is stable and sometimes it is not. 

So far, MongoDB has been quite stable.

I'd rate the stability nine or ten out of ten. There are no bugs or glitches. It doesn't crash or freeze.

It's pretty stable. We don't have any complaints.

The overall performance is faster than a relational database like SQL. But, the equation function in MongoDB is not as clever as the stored procedure in SQL. It's more complex to write the functionality like a stored procedure in MongoDB.

I would rate the performance of MongoDB a five out of ten.

MongoDB is stable, but there are always a lot of patches and upgrades every now and then.

It is very stable.

MongoDB is a stable solution.

The stability of the solution is very good. There are no bugs or glitches. It doesn't crash or freeze. It's pretty good overall.

We haven't had any issues with stability since we started using this solution two years ago.

If you take care of the application and check everything then it will be stable. However, if you do not maintain it properly and do not have support then stability will be a problem.

It is very stable.

We had issues. It wasn't operationalized yet, but our feeling was that it was easy to set up and easy to operate and very stable. So I would say our compatibility and performance are the two things that came up that I know in the project we had problems with. The rest wasn't at any point an issue.

MongoDB was stable and much faster than traditional SQL.

This solution is stable enough. There isn't much maintenance involved—we're just installing some software and then using it—especially since I'm using it from a development point of view. 

MongoDB is stable. We have had no technical issues with it.

There are bugs in the system but they are not very significant. We have found a workaround for each of those bugs and we have been running the full-scale production cluster for more than four and a half years. As we haven't had any issues, I would say that it is pretty stable.

This solution is used constantly by both us and our customers, every second of every day.

We are not looking at increasing our usage. Rather, we will be moving some of our workloads off of MongoDB. Ultimately, usage will be at a standstill or perhaps even reduced.

MongoDB is very stable.

We're just doing something new, and we are still in the testing stages. Based on our experience so far, it is stable.

We've never faced any issues with stability. It's been very good so far. It doesn't crash or freeze, and it's not buggy by any means.

The solution is stable and the performance is good. It's reliable. There are no bugs or glitches. It doesn't crash or freeze.

I have found MongoDB to be stable.

Our program developer finds it to be a little unstable, development-wise. Still, it's hard to say because we're new to this solution. It could just be that we don't understand how to properly use it yet.

We have some challenges but we are working on them. It should be a bit more stable.

No stability issues.

We have had no issues in terms of stability.

The solution is completely stable.

MongoDB for now is stable enough.

MongoDB is stable.

It's a stable solution, but it could be better.

MongoDB is stable. It's a good server. If you install perfect hardware tools and follow best practices, it'll be a good solution.

I did have some issues with putting up the server.

MongoDB is very stable.

It's stable. You can create sets which could be three servers, some reading and some writing, for example. This way if some servers go down the others are still up.

The solution is stable.