I rate the product a seven out of ten because there are ongoing efforts from various teams within the company working on this application. We're in the process of fixing numerous issues and implementing various modifications.

I would say I use the product for the type of applications for which I use it for JSP and React. From a popularity angle, I would say that most of the sites related to the Korean government use Java, along with React and Vue.

I believe that my company probably uses the product for backup purposes. In Korea, many government sites use a backup solution that helps with the recovery part. The solution provides backups like live backup, backup for Oracle, and file backup. The product acts as a total backup solution.

The tool allows my organization to encrypt certain data in the database, specifically in Oracle Database.

I rate the overall tool an eight out of ten.

Definitely the first requirements I look for are reliability, security, and cost. Also, whether all of the products to talk to each other seamlessly. When you look at AWS, for example, its pretty stable. They provide the IaaS, infrastructure as a service, but if I want to have the features of the WebLogic or the database cloud service, Oracle, and the Java, I have to do all my development on the IaaS that AWS provides. Whereas, Oracle Java Cloud Service provides the platform and the IaaS.

Also, Oracle is in the process of migrating all their products, which have been traditionally locally installed, to the cloud. That gives me the advantage of interacting with other applications seamlessly.

When you go to JCS, think about whether you want more than just the product and think about how you want to maintain the platform. It's a significant shift in the way you operate your IT. It's going to be a different proposition, it's going to be an infrastructure which is not managed by yourself in whole. You're just in the process of deploying to JCS.

A promising integration platform strategy is to ensure environments are delivered as a service on demand and ready to be consumed. Also customers may use JCS to run their FMW development environments but may want to have production environments on-premise. Unless there is a consistent and automated way of provisioning, ongoing configuration management, deployment, testing across both the MW platform on JCS and on-premise, it will be cumbersome to move applications between on-premise and JCS seamlessly.

I recommend using it. It's not too far from what I was using before; it's just a matter of compatibility between different offerings.

The product is very good, fine-tuned, and stable. Support is available 24/7 and is really fast and effective. However, it is somewhat expensive, so I rate it at eight out of 10.

You need to look into the Oracle Coherence optional offer as the description is not absolutely clear in some of the articles for beginners.

Make sure you network more. Get to know the techniques of the technology of Oracle and just expand it throughout your business and enlighten your employees.