When it comes to scalability because it is a cloud, you can always get additional resources, or you can scale up. At the point of integration, we have over three hundred. We created three instances, housing, roughly about one hundred of them, and then whenever we have additional disabilities, and we have maxed out on the number of instances, we just create another instance and start there, waiting for disabilities in that management. This is easy to notice on the cloud. Your resources are things that you can easily scale up without having to wait for hardware.

The solution is highly scalable.

SQL Azure offers a large number of scalability targets, such as memory and CPUs, and the disc given is highly configurable. The speed it takes to scale from one level to the next is fast.

We have approximately 100 people using the solution, which are mostly virtual developers.

We plan to increase our usage, we are migrating Google databases to SQL Databases.

I rate the scalability of SQL Azure a nine out of ten.

We did have some issues with data backups. Unlike traditional systems where backups were routine, with SQL Azure, managing data backups became an additional task. So, there have been issues with replication. But apart from that, scalability has been good.

I would rate the scalability an eight out of ten. We have enterprise businesses as our clients. 

It is a scalable solution.

My company deals with more than 7,000 customers who use the product.

I rate the scalability an eight out of ten. We have struggled to scale up the instances at times. Around 80 to 90 people in the organization use the solution.

SQL Azure is a scalable solution.

It is very scalable, depending on how much you're willing to pay. We can have up to 4,000 DTUs, but we haven't needed that much scalability.

It's scalable, but it could be better.

The product is on the cloud. It's very scalable for that reason. If a company needs to expand it, it can do so.

We have more than 10,000 users using the solution in my organization. 

The solution is scalable. Almost ten to twelve of our customers are using the solution.

We are using SQL Azure extensively. It is still being utilized in the gigabyte and petabyte range for older applications, as well.

We deploy the solution on four machines and are using VMware. We can continue to add on top of this as much as we like. Scalability isn't a problem at all.

I rate SQL Azure six out of 10 for scalability.

Its scalability is very good.

I rate the platform's scalability as 10 out of 10.

I would rate the scalability capabilities eight out of ten.

The solution is hugely scalable yet it does not support auto-scaling and it is very time-consuming. The PR database takes a lot of time hence one should keep another server synchronized with the dataset. Presently, ninety thousand users are using the solution. I rate the scalability a six out of ten. 

The solution is easy to scale. 

We have more than 1,000 people using the solution. I'm not sure of the exact number of users. We have multiple accounts and end customers. 

It is moderately scalable in my opinion. On-premise, you can definitely scale it up better, but it is a bit restricted on the cloud.

Azure SQL is scalable.

Not much is required in terms of scalability. So the foreign enterprises which are spanning the globe that requires scalability could be different. Small and medium businesses have a presence only in one location or maybe a couple of cities within a country. this is a reasonably scalable solution for them.

The scalability of Azure SQL is good. However, it is limited by the infrastructure. The cloud version gives more scalability.

It is a scalable solution. 

We have approximately 1,000 people using the solution in my organization.

I rate the scalability of SQL Azure a nine out of ten.

The solution can scale. I can't say how much as I don't have a comparable use case on the cloud and on-premises. 

We have about five people using the solution right now. For now, we do not have plans to increase usage.

SQL Azure is scalable.

There are more than 12,000 people using this service. Its usage is going to increase day by day.

It is a scalable solution. We have around 200 solution users in our organization. I rate its scalability an eight out of ten.

Its scalability is pretty high. Its ability to scale is very good. We're actually in the process of migrating on-prem to Azure, and its scalability is very easy.

In terms of the number of users, there are probably a hundred technical people who are leveraging the technologies. They are developers, administrators, and the BI group.

No issues encountered.

The solution is scalable.

It is highly scalable.

I would rate the scalability of this solution an eight, on a scale from one to 10, with one being the worst and 10 being the best. Currently, there are two users of this solution in our company.

It is quite scalable. It is a good choice for any kind of application database, data warehousing, or data lake. 

In terms of the number of users, it is being used by all users in our enterprise. For development, we have four to five developers, and we also have partners to help us.

It is easily scalable. We have around 60 to 70 users. We'll be increasing its usage. We are gradually moving to SQL Azure for all our requirements.

The scalability would be a bit better. That said, right now, I am happy with how it can scale. As a user, you always want it to be better; however, as of now, it's not too bad. 

I'm not sure how many people are using the solution in our company at this time. 

The scalability of SQL Azure is easy to do.

We have a lot of people in my organization using this solution. We have a large company.

There are not many users at the moment because we're still in pre-production. We're sort of in beta testing at the moment.

It probably has 50 users currently. It is not a very large tool. We are planning to expand its usage as we build out our actual software ourselves, which we're still working on. We'll be making that available to customers, and we'll be offering that as a global opportunity for customers.

It has got Microsoft's backbone on it. It is very scalable. At this stage, we don't have many users because we're still busy migrating over to Azure cloud. In the next year, we'll probably have close to a million customers because that's what we've got on our books.

It is very scalable. 

We didn’t have any scalability problems.

The solution is scalable.

SQL Azure is a scalable solution. Around 30 to 40 customers are using the solution.

It has good scalability. We have about a thousand users.

SQL Azure is a scalable solution. Around ten users are regularly using SQL Azure in our organization.

The solution is scalable. I rate is as nine out of ten.

The scalability of SQL Azure is very good.

I think SQL Azure is scalable. Almost 200 people are using it in the commercial department.

This solution is scalable. Multiple tiers and multiple layers are there. 

SQL Azure is perfectly scalable.

We have a team of 20 to 25 developers who are using this solution for development. 

Also, we have thousands of clients for the databases that are using it.

The solution can scale well. That's not a problem at all. If a company needs to scale, they can do so easily.

It is easily scalable. We have five people who are working with this solution.

It's a scalable product. We have eight members in our organization who are using this solution.

We have plans to continue using this solution.

The solution is scalable. It takes a bit of knowledge about the process but then is really easy.  

It is scalable. We have six users and two people in our technical team for its deployment.

It's scalable. I worked sales and marketing for Microsoft and I know it's scalable. You can increase and decrease the specs for the server on demand. When it comes to physical hardware, you can increase the specs if you get the wrong machine. With software, you have to pay more money. You can also easily scale down and decrease the specs and save some money if you like.

The solution scales well. If a company needs to expand it, it can do so with relative ease.

It is scalable. In fact, it is too easy to scale. It just scales and sends you the invoice. You have to tune it to lock it down, and then it doesn't go too far. These are the kind of things you have to take care of to avoid having bad surprises at the end of the month when they send you the resource usage invoice.

SQL Azure is perfectly scalable. 

I think they still have issues with scalability. For applications requiring scalability, I'd recommend using the database on the cloud and not on-premises. We have up to 200 users for this solution, mainly office workers and generally working in small to medium sized companies. 

This is a scalable solution.

The scalability is good. We have 100 users and one can upgrade the system by performance and by the size of the storage. You can move between different types of storage using block or docket. You can use any way you choose without losing data. So the scalability it is very good. We plan to increase our usage.

It is very flexible. In the case of a heavy load period, you don’t see any difference in terms of performance. The advantage with a SaaS service is the normal scalability.

The product is absolutely scalable.

It is scalable. We haven't hit any limits yet, but we're not running huge workloads.

There are only three users who use it. Once we are more comfortable we will give it to more users. My technology team uses it. 

There have been no issues with scalability. This is a strong feature of the product.

This is a very scalable product.

I am the only person in my company who uses it.

It is scalable because it is in Azure. We have around 50 to 60 developers who access it.

It's very scalable. That's why we like cloud solutions. You just add on every time you need some more performance pages. I just change the plan and it works.

The solution is quite scalable. If a company needs to expand it, it can do so with relative ease.

I'm from a technology provider. We provision these services and provide them to other clients. One of the infrastructure environments which we are provisioning on Azure would be used by probably approximately 8,000 to 10,000 users.

In terms of if we plan to continue usage or not, we are just building it on Azure right now. So it will be live in a year or two, something like this.

The solution can scale quite well. It's very easy to scale, for example, on AWS.

We typically work with big enterprise clients such as banks and utilities. The projects are quite sizeable.

I don't think scalability is an issue, it's just a matter of adding more RAM as the users increase. 

I would rate scalability as ten out of ten.

The scalability of SQL Azure is fine. I needed more stability with Cisco but not with SQL Azure.

The solution offers up options for scalability. Right now, in our organization, only one person is using Azure SQL and they are using it daily.

It is indeed scalable. We have around five people using it, and we plan to scale it.

It is very scalable. Around 14 developers in our company use it. They are responsible for business intelligence and databases.