IBM FileNet vs Laserfiche Rio vs Oracle Content Management comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
IBM Logo
4,953 views|2,995 comparisons
91% willing to recommend
Laserfiche Logo
300 views|177 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Oracle Logo
893 views|772 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between IBM FileNet, Laserfiche Rio, and Oracle Content Management based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, OpenText, Box and others in Enterprise Content Management.
To learn more, read our detailed Enterprise Content Management Report (Updated: April 2024).
768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The most useful feature is its persistent storage. Also, the full-text search and attribute searching are valuable.""We have probably cut out at least 40 percent of what the work process was by easing out that whole distribution of paper.""It is used by large enterprises. It has to be scalable and robust for them to use. We have seen that on multiple projects over the years.""FileNet is very user-friendly... We have business users using and it is quite friendly for them.""One of our clients, a customer of IBM, rolled out and replaced their existing ECM system with FileNet. Their productivity has increased pretty dramatically.""It saves our customers time by 30 to 40 percent by eliminating the time to process paper.""I like the security and also the configuration. It is easy to configure and most of our business use cases have everything just with the configuration itself.""It has improved my organization by how we release documents, claims, and policies."

More IBM FileNet Pros →

"This is a very complete and powerful solution."

More Laserfiche Rio Pros →

"It's a comprehensive solution for managing documents within our organization's management framework."

More Oracle Content Management Pros →

Cons
"It would be nice to have additional integration features, which could be integration with IoOT-based products and solutions that also have automation requirements on the IOT side. Anything can be integrated from a Gateway or API perspective would be a plus.""If there was more AI capability, into Watson, that would be a benefit.""​I would rate the technical support as medium. I do not like the login process. It is not great.""We would like to see, in FileNet, the ability to manage video and audio.​""Currently, our primary ERP system is SAP S/4HANA. Despite this, we have encountered difficulties integrating the solution with it, which remains an unresolved challenge for our team.""The new software and trends with the cloud solution is a little slow. I would like them to move toward more cloud-based and microservices rather than a SaaS model. This is where the industry is going and what customers are asking for.""It needs better collaboration between the IBM teams on the FileNet and CCM sides.""The FileNet API seems like it is very difficult and not transparent."

More IBM FileNet Cons →

"We would like to see more features for RPA and AI."

More Laserfiche Rio Cons →

"Oracle Content Management poses complexities in initial implementation and configuration."

More Oracle Content Management Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "The biggest issue is the cost of the FileNet, because the license cost is very high. If a customer doesn't have good technical guides that are aware of the license calculation, they will pay too much. FileNet's license calculation depends on the processor and number of users. So my advice to a new customer is to be very careful with your calculations before purchasing FileNet."
  • "It is still a leading ECM solution provider, however the cost to implement and maintain are higher than other solutions."
  • "FileNet is not cheap, but you absolutely get what you pay for. ​"
  • "For small scale industries, they allow different options. They can do open source. It is the complexity of the data security that they should think about before they choose."
  • "For the medium scale or large scale, I would recommend FileNet. FileNet is free of licensing expenses, thus good for the money. It is not expensive, but worth for the money, especially for medium scale and large scale industries."
  • "​There are lots of components to the product. Make sure before you invest that you know which components you need.​​"
  • "1. It will be more expensive than estimated to setup. 2. You will need to double the staff while you are running the old system and installing the new system. 3. Depending on the number of documents to be migrated, make sure you understand the potentially massive amount of time and effort required to migrate the existing content to the new platform."
  • "The physical space that we have gained back pays for the service. Therefore, it has reduced our operating costs overall. We have definitely seen ROI. I would estimate $30,000 a year."
  • More IBM FileNet Pricing and Cost Advice →

    Information Not Available
    Information Not Available
    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Enterprise Content Management solutions are best for your needs.
    768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:The product is robust and can process a lot of documents for enterprise content management.
    Top Answer:The product is expensive. The price was 30% higher than what we needed to pay for IBM. I rate the product’s pricing a… more »
    Top Answer:The user interface of IBM content management, including the ability to customize screens without the need for coding… more »
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    Top Answer:It's a comprehensive solution for managing documents within our organization's management framework.
    Top Answer:Oracle Content Management poses complexities in initial implementation and configuration.
    Top Answer:We use Content Management to supervise and control document access within our management structure. This involves… more »
    Ranking
    Views
    4,953
    Comparisons
    2,995
    Reviews
    5
    Average Words per Review
    408
    Rating
    7.6
    Views
    300
    Comparisons
    177
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    Views
    893
    Comparisons
    772
    Reviews
    1
    Average Words per Review
    627
    Rating
    9.0
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Oracle Document and Process Cloud, Oracle Content and Experience Cloud
    Learn More
    Overview

    IBM FileNet is a leading IBM enterprise content management product family. IBM FileNet is one of the ECM solutions that can change the way a company does business by enabling users to capture, activate, socialize, analyze, and govern content throughout its lifecycle.

    There are many IBM FileNet products available, all of which are integrated and based on the FileNet P8 Platform.

    Powerful Document Management Software and Agile Enterprise Content Management Solutions

    Oracle Content and Experience Cloud is a cloud-based content hub to drive omni-channel content management and accelerate experience delivery.

    Sample Customers
    Suncorp Group Limited, St. Vincent Health, Citigroup, SRCSD, and UK Dept for Work and Pensions.
    D.L. Evans, College of the Desert, Community Action, Tompkins County, Hanson McClain, Olmsted County, Old Line Bank, Steinhafels, CIRCOR Pibiviesse
    TekStream Solutions LLC, NetCompany, AFG, Pride Mobility, TEAM Informatics Pty Ltd., Sutton Tools, Mythics, Inc., DVLA
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Financial Services Firm31%
    Insurance Company16%
    Healthcare Company10%
    Government7%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm21%
    Computer Software Company13%
    Government10%
    Insurance Company10%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Educational Organization36%
    Government15%
    Financial Services Firm7%
    Comms Service Provider6%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm15%
    Government14%
    Computer Software Company12%
    Educational Organization8%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business24%
    Midsize Enterprise11%
    Large Enterprise65%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business17%
    Midsize Enterprise13%
    Large Enterprise70%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business18%
    Midsize Enterprise45%
    Large Enterprise36%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business20%
    Midsize Enterprise19%
    Large Enterprise61%
    Buyer's Guide
    Enterprise Content Management
    April 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, OpenText, Box and others in Enterprise Content Management. Updated: April 2024.
    768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.