Apache Kafka Room for Improvement

RH
reviewer1289778
Enterprise Architect at a tech services company with 11-50 employees

The model where you create the integration or the integration scenario needs improvement. It contains fewer developer words or maintaining words where someone prepared the topics, the connectors, or the streaming platforms. You would first need to have a control center from a third party for managing. 

If you would like to prepare something that is a more sophisticated integration scenario, where you use one microservice to provide the event or a second to several that consumed these microservices, then this needs to be modeled elsewhere. 

Also, when comparing to the traditional ESD for data mixing, you can create a scenario that could be deployed with inputs and some outputs.

Most business like the topics, but for me, I think that it is a problem that messaging platforms have, there is no design tool with IDE for creating.

It would be helpful to create a more complex solution for several types of styles, and not just for one provider or for one customer. That would be easier, but if you have more than one consumer then it could be a more complex scenario. It would be like events that go to several microservers to create orders, validate orders, and creating words. This would be helpful.

In the next release, adding some IDE or developing tools, for creating better integration scenarios, even though it already a developer-oriented solution, would be helpful. It would also be helpful for the auto-deployment.

Having a governance style would also be helpful to understand. 

It would be beneficial to have a repository of all of the topics, data types that exist, or data structures.

View full review »
OnurTokat
Senior Big Data Developer | Cloudera at Dilisim

If the graphical user interface was easier for the Kafka administration it would be much better. Right now, you need to use the program with a command-line interface. If the graphical user interface was easier, it could be a better product.

View full review »
KS
reviewer1421481
Solution Architect at a manufacturing company with 10,001+ employees

They need to have a proper portal to do everything because, at this moment, Kafka is lagging in this regard. It could be used to do the preprocessing or the configurations, instead of directly doing it on the queues or the topics. If you look at Solace, for example, they have come up with a portal where you don't need to touch these activities. You don't need to access the platform beyond the portal.

View full review »
Learn what your peers think about Apache Kafka. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: June 2021.
509,820 professionals have used our research since 2012.
MS
reviewer1304505
Senior Consultant at a tech services company with 51-200 employees

Due to the fact that the solution is open source, it has a zookeeper dependency. If I could change anything about the solution, it would be that.

The solution could always add a few more features to enhance its usage.

View full review »
JJ
reviewer1247268
Technology Lead at a computer software company with 10,001+ employees

Kafka does not provide control over the message queue, so we do not know whether we are experiencing lost or duplicate messages. Better control over the message queue would be an improvement. Solutions such as ActiveMQ do afford better control. Because of this, there is sometimes a gap in the results where we have either lost messages, or there are duplicates.

We have had problems when there was an imbalance because all of the messages were being sent back.

View full review »
MoulaliNaguri
Project Engineer at Wipro Technologies

We're still going through the solution. Right now, I can't suggest any features that might be missing. I don't see where there can be an improvement in that regard.

The speed isn't as fast as RabbitMQ, even though the solution touts itself as very quick. It could be faster. They should work to make it at least as fast as RabbitMQ.

The UI is based on command line. It would be helpful if they could come up with a simpler user interface.

They should make it easier to configure items on the solution.

The solution would benefit from the addition of better monitoring tools.

View full review »
LP
Lakshmanan Panneerselvam
Owner at Binarylogicworks.com.au

Kafka is complex and there is a little bit of a learning curve.

View full review »
SergeyGoncharov
Developer Infrastructure at Outbrain

There is a feature that we're currently using called MirrorMaker. We use it to combine the information from different Kafka servers into another server. It's very wide and it gives a very generic scenario. I think it would be great if the possibility would exist out of the box and not as a third party. The third party is not very stable and sometimes you have problems with this component. There are some developments in newer versions and we're about to try them out, but I'm not sure if it closes the gap.

View full review »
Ravi-Patel
Assistant Professor at CHAROTAR UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY

The solution can improve by having automation for developers. We have done many manual calculations and it has been difficult but if it was automated it would be much better.

View full review »
Reza Gholami
Senior Technology Architect at a tech services company with 10,001+ employees

Some vendors don't offer extra features for monitoring. Some come with Linux for default monitoring. Monitoring is very important. If something is not working properly, then our subscribers won't receive a notification. You then have to trace it back to Kafka and find the glitch or the messaging sequence that hasn't been racked up correctly.

It should support Avro — which handles different data formats — as a default data format. It would be much more flexible if it did.

View full review »
WG
reviewer1388343
Solutions Architect at a tech services company with 201-500 employees

The initial setup and deployment could be less complex.

Integration is one of the main concerns that we have.

View full review »
NC
Narendra Chauhan
Chief Technology Officer at a tech services company with 1-10 employees

The graphical user environment is currently lacking in Apache. It's not available within the solution and needs to be built from scratch. Some of the open source products of this solution have limitations. 

View full review »
AL
reviewer998961
Enterprice Architect

More adapters for connecting to different systems need to be available.

View full review »
MB
Mukulit Bhati
Product Manager at Insightgeeks

The manageability should be improved. There are lots of things we need to manage and it should have a function that enables us to manage them all cohesively. There should be a default property. It's really hard to manage all these things.

View full review »
AhmadMasamreh
IBMi/MIMIX Administrator at Arab Bank

This solution could be made easier to manage.

Compatibility with other solutions and integration with other tools can be improved.

We cannot apply all of our security requirements because it is hard to upload them.

View full review »
RABBAHMahmoud
Senior Technical Architect at RABBAH SOFT

In the next release, I would like for there to be some authorization features and HTL security. 

We also need bigger software and better monitoring. 

View full review »
Learn what your peers think about Apache Kafka. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: June 2021.
509,820 professionals have used our research since 2012.