Camunda Other Advice
The most important thing would be to do a proof of concept before going too far. Some tools are very stable and you can go with them right away, but with Camunda, just because there is so much to know, it is better to do a proof of concept before going all in.
The connectors provided by Camunda can be enough. It depends on your use case. By default, there is an HTTP connector, and there is also a SOAP connector. It is easy to use the connectors. They provide a base connector, and you can build it more. In our case, we had to go a little further and develop plugins in Java, which was a bit of an issue because it is not our main technology stack. We don't develop much in Java. So, there was a learning curve for developers, but overall, it went well.
I know that Camunda offers a user interface for people when they need to interact with it. We didn't use it in our case because we found the user interface too simple. It was not providing us with enough information. and the other thing was that if a user is working in system A and had to interact with Camunda, he had to leave his context to go to system B and do the task. So, in our case, we decided to integrate it into the same system to provide all the information that a user needs to accomplish a task. So, it is a bit limited in that aspect, but the fact is that when you use Camunda, what you're trying to achieve as a goal is to prevent people from interacting too much with the process. So, it may not be a problem if the user interface is not as rich and complex.
I would rate it an eight out of ten.
We intend to do a few things with the product, and I am unsure if it would raise or drop the product's rating in the future.
So far, considering the modeling purposes for which we used the tool in the last month, I rate the overall solution a nine out of ten.
Camunda's website is filled with a lot of knowledgeable stuff, so it is important to get in touch with a person from Camunda. By just going through the website Camunda, it is possible to strengthen your understanding of the fundamentals of the product. Camunda also provides free courses to those who want to learn more about the product.
I rate the overall tool a seven and a half out of ten.
Buyer's Guide
Camunda
April 2024
Learn what your peers think about Camunda. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: April 2024.
768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.
BN
reviewer846930
Product Owner at a insurance company with 10,001+ employees
It's important to have the customers on board and work closely with them. That's because if they don't get what you are doing, you will not have customers. It's very important to work closely with the customers to be successful. It's important to make sure that customers understand what the platform does and how it's achieving. The training part and creating awareness are important. You need to create awareness about automation and what it can provide to customers.
Most of the time, people are too busy to do any automation, even though it will help them in the long run. What I learned is that you can't delegate it to a team. You have to be hands-on with the team and help them to make the automation. That is important.
From the Camunda perspective, you can start with the open-source version, and then at a later stage, evaluate if you require the enterprise features for your use case.
When it comes to connectors, we sometimes use the implementation provided by the community, but so far, we have not used the standard connectors provided with Camunda because, in Swiss Re, there are a lot of custom implementations, and sometimes, the connectors don't work straight away. So, we usually implement our own workers.
I would rate it an 8 out of 10. Once it has the improvements we need, I can give it a 10.
View full review »JL
reviewer2091747
Architect intégrateur des processus d'affaire at a government with 10,001+ employees
The only negative point was the performance. If a company wants to use it with small or medium-sized systems that do not need a lot of performance, it would be a good choice.
View full review »Overall, I would rate the solution an eight out of ten.
I'd recommend it if you're currently paying a high annual fee for a solution like IBM BPM. Camunda is much more affordable while still offering a strong SLA agreement and security.
It's worth trying – perhaps initially with a smaller process in your organization. You could even test it on a UAT environment before going live. I often recommend this approach to clients, as it's a good solution for many use cases.
View full review »Overall, I would rate it ten out of ten.
View full review »I would advise comparing it with Camunda Cloud or Zeebe. If your use case allows you, go with Camunda Cloud because, this way, you can leverage this new system that has fewer scalability problems. It is not a straightforward recommendation because at least until last year, the set of features in Camunda Cloud wasn't the same as Camunda On-Premises. That's why we didn't use Camunda Cloud.
We didn't use any third-party connectors. We used Camunda and then we used just the HTTP connector to orchestrate our microservices. We didn't do a direct connection from Camunda to any outside or third-party system. With Camunda, we only wanted to orchestrate our microservices, which can then connect to third-party or other systems. We wanted to keep our architecture clean, and this piece of software was used to orchestrate microservices, which was great.
Camunda provides an interface where business users can create, update, and execute complex workflows, but we didn't use this feature. No one from the business side used it for creating their own processes or modifying anything. I used it only for microservices. Being able to have a diagram and being able to have a business discussion by using the diagram as a reference was good. It was very interesting because we could have all the teams and all the specialists on the same page, but I didn't have anyone from the business side or operation side directly using or connecting with Camunda.
It hasn't reduced the cost to design and implement critical processes. That's because we weren't using any other tool previously. So, I don't have a comparison. It also didn't have any effect on our TCO. We are a cloud company. We have a very modern infrastructure where everything is on Amazon. The team is very used to getting docker systems and running complex systems inside of Kubernetes. We haven't had any trouble running it.
I would rate this solution an eight out of ten.
View full review »AJ
reviewer1954143
Staff Software Engineer at a retailer with 1,001-5,000 employees
Take a look at their co-founder and CTO, Bernd Ruecker's, blog. He has a lot of good write-ups about the platform where he explains the technical architecture. He talks about how to do performance benchmarking.
Another good piece of advice is to leverage the Camunda community and forum. Their team is very active on the public forum and they respond to your questions within a day, most of the time. They give very to-the-point answers. That is a really helpful resource. They also have a good set of tutorials on BPMN in what they call the Camunda Academy. It's worth taking a look at that when you are adopting the Zeebe workflow engine, which is their primary workflow engine.
One of the important things that we want to deliver is enabling business, developers, and operations. It's important that our non-technical stakeholders don't have to get into the nitty-gritty details of technical implementations. They can have a bird's-eye view of what's happening in a process, and they can suggest or even extend a process by themselves and then hand it over to us as a requirements document. That's the direction we really want to take. So far, the product team has been very enthusiastic about it. They like it. Camunda uses a language for modeling called BPMN and it doesn't require you to be a coder or an engineer. It's a simple drag-and-drop tool. It's really cool and it helps our stakeholders to be involved in working with workflows.
There is a bit of a learning curve with BPMN. It's an industry standard, not something proprietary to Camunda, but Camunda hosts an online academy where they have tutorials about it. They have videos and free courses on how to use BPMN. That helps out in the onboarding of users.
We have been using it for a little less than a year, so our entire organization is not using it. We are really into building our experience with Camunda by applying it to a few use cases. As we see more use cases in other parts of the organization, what we have built over this past year as templates—as reusable software—can be leveraged so that they don't have to set up everything from scratch on their own.
View full review »I rate the overall product a seven out of ten.
View full review »If you're looking for flexibility, this is the solution. There's no super bullet that does everything but the flexibility Camuna provides is a good start.
I rate this solution eight out of 10.
IS
Ivana Sabatova
Senior Business Consultant, Managing Partner at sabi consulting
My advice to anyone considering Camunda is that I recommend to use the free version for trainings and for testing and for not very crucial process automation for pilot project purposes, but not for production and not for key processes. For key processes and for production, I always recommend to buy the support.
On a scale of one to ten, I would give Camunda Platform a 10 for sure.
It's very good. But it depends on what you are expecting.
For other purposes, there might be something else which is preferable. It is not easy to say there is one business process management for all purposes, for all companies. I would recommend Camunda for either small or middle-sized companies.
I would not recommend it for corporate uses because to integrate in this scenario requires much more extensive and intensive technical work for integration with the usual applications, et cetera. Therefore, Bonita or IBM Business Management Suite, for example, already have many thousands of connectors to Salesforce, SAP, ERP Systems, Microsoft systems, et cetera, whereas with Camunda, you are almost in the beginning and you have to develop everything by yourself. So for larger companies, the implementation might be too long and too expensive.
View full review »I recommend the product to those who plan to use it, as it is a simple and practical tool with powerful capabilities.
The product helps achieve operational efficiency in our company since it helps with the process modeling area. The product also helps automate and orchestrate processes effectively.
Camunda's user interface's contribution to process modeling and deployment stems from the fact that it is pretty intuitive and simple.
It is easy for someone to learn to use Camunda.
I rate the overall tool an eight out of ten.
Camunda is deployed on the cloud in our organization. I would recommend Camunda for low to medium-scale businesses. I would not recommend the solution to high-scale businesses because of the lack of documentation.
Camunda is the right choice for long-running business processes instead of ones that can be finished in a few seconds or minutes.
Overall, I rate Camunda an eight out of ten.
SM
SeanMcClellan
Managing Director at Cheltenham Consultants
My advice for anybody who is implementing Camunda is to pay attention to transaction integrity. The biggest lesson that I have learned from using it is to do a little bit more architectural spike work before committing to all of the development.
Overall, it is a pretty good product but there is room for improvement.
I would rate this solution a seven out of ten.
View full review »SW
Simon Wanyutu
Founder at Simpro Tech
Having learned about BPM, I gained valuable insights from one of the key contributors to the ONG group, a prominent founder of the organization who is also involved in the development of Camunda. Based on my experience, I would strongly suggest this solution to anyone seeking to implement a robust Camunda Platform.
My recommendation is to ensure proper documentation of the initial processes. This is because one of the challenges faced by our clients is the lack of documentation for their processes.
The challenge lies not only in defining policies but also in documenting end-to-end processes. During the documentation process, it becomes apparent that some knowledge is retained by individuals rather than being stored in a centralized procedure.
Before considering automation, I recommend prioritizing process documentation. This ensures that all critical information and expertise are centralized and easily accessible, resulting in a more successful automated implementation.
I would rate Camunda Platform a six out of ten.
We chose to use Camunda because it's open-source, easy to develop, and scalable, plus we were able to develop some of the enterprise features offered with the license in-house only. I would definitely recommend anyone thinking of implementing Camunda to try it out, just bear in mind that when the number of tasks increases, you need to write your own queries and that you need to keep the number of form variables low because performance decreases when it gets higher. I would rate Camunda Platform eight out of ten.
View full review »HV
reviewer2328264
Digitalization PM at a manufacturing company with 1,001-5,000 employees
It's not possible for us to define a process as deep as it is necessary to automate it. We tested but did not use DMN capabilities. I will recommend the solution to others. I just finished studying business process management. Overall, I rate the product an eight out of ten.
View full review »Overall, I rate the solution a nine out of ten.
View full review »KB
reviewer1195653
BPM Technical Referent at a computer software company with 1,001-5,000 employees
I recommend developing their expertise and skills with BPM. They should have a deep understanding of architecture. Starting with good releases is important because it allows users to become familiar with powerful tools and solutions.
If you encounter a real problem, it is crucial to have a well-configured environment, whether it's a web server or any other production platform. Implementing BPM with good practices and optimization is key.
Overall, Camunda can be a powerful tool to work with when used in an optimized and well-implemented manner.
Overall, I would rate Camunda Platform an eight out of ten.
View full review »ML
MARCELOLIMA
Gerente do Escritório de Processos at SEAD
I would rate this solution 10 out of 10.
My advice is try to understand and use it because it's really an amazing solution. I only have nice words to say about it. I really hope our central IT area runs this proof of concept, and that it becomes successful in the near future so that we really start offering public services on Camunda Platform. It's easy to use, stable, it integrates areas, and you can use the community version.
View full review »UT
Uday Shankar Tummala
Practice Lead at Sky Solutions, LLC
I would advise others to verify the technology stack that they already have in place. They should check the orchestration part and see if they need to take care of any redesigning.
I would rate Camunda Platform a nine out of ten.
Setting up or translating business processes using the Camunda platform is easy. It provides flexibility for integrating with different third-party systems. We have implemented the product to optimize internal business processes and improve API communication between different units.
I rate it an eight out of ten.
View full review »SA
reviewer2343942
Delivery Manager at a computer software company with 201-500 employees
I recommend using the product. Overall, I rate the product an eight out of ten.
View full review »VR
VishwaReddy
Engineering Manager at nagra
It is loosely coupled. Therefore, there is a lot of flexibility in the way we want to restrict the usage of Camunda.
I would rate it a nine out of 10.
View full review »ML
MARCELOLIMA
Gerente do Escritório de Processos at SEAD
My advice: try it because it's a great solution.
On a scale from one to ten, I would give Camunda BPM a rating of nine. If the initial setup was easier, I would give it a ten.
View full review »RC
Rodrigo Carlstrom
BPM Consultant at a tech services company with 1-10 employees
I feel that the Camunda engine is a very scalable platform, and compares well with many other BPM platforms that I work with.
I would rate Camunda a ten out of ten.
View full review »We have not yet explored all that Camunda Platform offers.
We would recommend this solution to others who are considering using it.
I would rate Camunda Platform a nine out of ten.
View full review »PM
Piotr Mazur
Digital Transformation Solution Manager at Altkom Software & Consutling
We are using the community edition so it is hard to ask for extra features ;-) I fully understand that if we still want to benefit from the open-source version, there has to be a paid premium version, so that the product can be further developed.
View full review »SM
reviewer1381905
Head Of Applications & Data Architecture at a maritime company with 501-1,000 employees
My advice is you have to be a bit optimistic and you need to see if this solution is the right fit. You have to determine if you are looking for a low-code platform or a headless platform. There is a misunderstanding between multiple products and the Camunda Platform being a headless BPMN, it is not a low-code platform.
I rate Camunda Platform an eight out of ten.
View full review »MB
reviewer1744827
Founding partner at a government with self employed
We are beginning to use it for modeling some areas in the public sector, and there is no problem. I am yet to use all the features that Camunda has. For me, it is a complete solution at this time.
I would rate it an eight out of 10.
View full review »AG
Abdurrahman Gori
Technical Manager at a comms service provider with 501-1,000 employees
My advice for anybody who is considering Camunda BPM is that they implementing a PoC first.
I would rate this solution a six out of ten.
In terms of advice, if you're considering Camunda, you must know how to code Java. If you go on YouTube and type "Camunda", or "intro video for Camunda", the Camunda people will tell you, "You need Java developers."
When you go open source, you start to make the product a little more complex to use because they don't have as many wizards, whereas, some people will get away with only knowing scripting. They were able to use ActiveVOS because they've provided a bunch of wizards. You need Java developers to use Camunda properly.
Overall, it's very flexible and nimble.
View full review »SS
SmitaS
Associate Artist at Thoughtschools
Overall, I rate Camunda Platform a seven or eight out of ten.
View full review »SS
reviewer1396116
Digital Engineering Manager at a comms service provider with 10,001+ employees
My advice about Camunda is I recommend this product when it fits your needs. It is that simple.
On a scale from one to ten where one is the worst and ten is the best, I would rate this product as a nine because it fits my demands. Of course, there is always room for improvement in the interface, or performance, and stuff like that.
I hope that people will work on Camunda and within the next releases we will have more connectors, we will have a much more powerful interface, and maybe we can have a mobile app as well.
AB
AlonBear
Co Founder at Dr. Agile
We are currently a startup with Insur Tech and we are sensitive to cost. It's our strategy and it is the best tool for the price at this time.
What I have learned from using Camunda BPM is to keep it simple.
I would rate this solution an eight out of ten.
View full review »CP
Chandu Panda
MEA Head at Aaseya IT Services Pvt. Ltd.
Camunda primarily functions as a BPM platform. It requires development work for customization. Users accustomed to a local setup may find it less preferable. At the same time, tech-savvy developers who enjoy extensive customization options may favor the solution due to its flexibility in adapting design models based on their preferences. For such developers, this solution would be a perfect ten.
PD
Pratap Dehury
Senior Technical Manager at Infosys
The learning curve is a bit steep. I would rate this solution an eight out of ten.
View full review »UT
Uday Shankar Tummala
Practice Lead at Sky Solutions, LLC
I would definitely recommend this solution, especially if they are spending a large amount of money using proprietary BPM tools, such as Pega BPM.
I would rate this solution an eight out of ten.
View full review »OM
Oscar Mejia
IT-Services Manager & Solution Architect at Stratis
I would advise potential Camunda BPM customers to be patient. Perhaps all the information isn't available in one click, but it's possible to implement Camunda BPM, and it's quite flexible. It's worth a try.
On a scale from one to ten, I would give Camunda BPM an eight.
View full review »PB
reviewer1380240
Vice President & Account CTO at a tech services company with 10,001+ employees
I would rate this solution a seven out of 10.
View full review »MA
Mohamed Alshishani
Chief, Service Delivery at IGA
We're very strongly recommending Camunda BPM. It is good. It is easy. The community is good. There is a lot of support if you are stuck anywhere. You can Google it and find the answers. Many people are using Camunda BPM worldwide and finding the responses was easy.
I would rate it an eight out of ten. The reason why I wouldn't rate it a 10/10 or higher is that there are some other features available within other tools that can improve the algorithms they are not aware of yet.
Camunda BPM satisfies our requirements and we have been using it for a year.
View full review »PB
Peter Barbiers
Managing consultant at a computer software company with 10,001+ employees
Often more functions will make a model or tool more complex. I like the simplicity of Camunda. It is very easy to use.
View full review »EC
reviewer1074954
PMO Office Digital Transformation, Ministry of the Interior at a manufacturing company with 1,001-5,000 employees
I rate Camunda a seven out of ten. I would recommend the paid version of Camunda because of the difficulties we have had with the free version. It's easy to start using, but it's difficult to make changes.
View full review »As a process analyst, I'm into IT development, so my advice is not to make processes highly detailed. The value added here is the freeware version that can give you the best tool to get the job done as a process analyst.
I would rate this solution an eight out of 10.
MS
Mohammed Sulty
Principal Consultant at Palmira
We are users of the solution.
We are the latest version due to the fact that we are developing our own product based on Camunda. We are developing a solution based on Camunda. We are a heavy user of Camunda.
Camunda is not so popular in the market due to the UI (meaning the form builder, the way of developing the forms which would be attached to the process), and the data monitor (how to exchange the data between the activities).
A company would need to create an integration framework between Camunda and other systems. If they sold their offering with the UI and data monitor it would be the biggest automation tool ever.
For us, with our experience with using the tool, you need a good developer to be able to use the system effectively. Other than that there are no issues. For an organization that wants to adopt Camunda, they need to have the proper resources, and the proper training to use the system.
I'd rate the solution at an eight out of ten. There's a bug inside the BPMN monitor that knocks a few points off the rating. If the system is not saved, it will crash.
View full review »AC
reviewer1166220
Director - Delivery (Application Development & Maintenance) at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees
If a company has workflow automation requirements or needs orchestration, it's quite useful.
Overall, it's good and solid. At least up to version seven, which we're heavily using. Version eight is progressing, and Camunda will continue to add the things we need. I would rate it at least a nine out of ten.
View full review »RA
Rahul Aryan
Business process manager at a comms service provider with 10,001+ employees
I would not recommend this solution because I did not have a good experience.
I rate Camunda Platform a five out of ten.
View full review »SV
SjefVan Leeuwen
Senior Software Engineer at a non-profit with 201-500 employees
We use the free version, the open-source version, but there is an Enterprise option. And the Enterprise version has heat maps so you can easily optimize complex processes on performance. You can easily see the hot spots that need to be scaled in a different manner in terms of hardware or improving your process flow.
I would definitely recommend the solution to anyone. At least for the short-term. They are currently shifting towards their new product, Zeebe. We are actually currently using it already in smaller labs on smaller projects, such as modelling process flow's and micro service orchestration driving front end ui's such as digital assistants. But there is not much difference between the two so, I would definitely advise anyone starting with a BPM, in general, to start with Camunda. I found Camunda really easy to start with.
I would rate this solution 8 out of 10.
View full review »I would recommend it, as long as the business team can design the workflows, but the technical team can design the workflows. If they are technical, then I would definitely recommend it. For enterprise-grade, I would recommend looking into bigger equipment.
I would rate Camunda BPM an eight out of ten.
View full review »SS
Sergey Stepanov
Enterprise Architect at a financial services firm with 11-50 employees
Functional agility is the main reason we use this platform. I would rate this solution as nine out of ten.
View full review »DK
Dmitry Kositsyn
CTO at Unitarius
We are end-users of the solution.
I'd advise potential new users to learn BPM notation. It is an issue due to the fact that we have to propagate BPM notation to our customers as a lot of customers don't know what is it and how to use and why BPM is a good solution.
Currently, this is the best solution compared to global JBPM and other open-source BPM platforms.
I'd rate the solution at a seven out of ten.
View full review »TM
Tomas Mikes
CEO at CodeDock.com at Trask solutions a.s.
I feel that there is always room for improvement, so I rate this solution a nine out of ten.
View full review »IM
reviewer1689150
Enterprise Architect/Team Manager at a tech services company with 201-500 employees
If you're considering an open-source tool, I would recommend Camunda and rate it eight out of 10.
View full review »AM
Alberto Margarido
CGL at Dynamus Clube
We're just customers and end-users. We're currently still experimenting with the product and learning about it.
I'm using the latest version of the solution. I cannot speak to the exact version number, however.
I'd advise users considering the solution to stick to the documentation and go to their GitHub to view some staples. There is a lot of good stuff in there.
So far, we have been happy with the product and its capabilities. I would rate it at a nine out of ten.
View full review »MM
MohammadrezaMakhan
R&D Junior at a consumer goods company with 11-50 employees
My advice to others would be to know their own abilities, their own resources. Are they comfortable with a lot of programming even for a simple form? Do they have enough programming provided in their resources? If they are not comfortable with that, it can take a little longer for them to adapt to Camunda. But if they have good developers, programmers, HTML, CSS and so on, they won't have a problem. I can also say the documentation is good and they have a live, technical forum where you can ask questions and get a fast response. I am not sure if it is available in all BPM packages, though.
On a scale from one to 10, I will rate this solution a seven, because there are quite a few things that could be improved.
View full review »MC
Milan Cvijanovic
IT Architect at Levio
Right now we use a standalone Camunda in Docker. Before, on previous projects, we used embedded Camunda in Java applications. We use both cloud and on-premises deployment models. For cloud deployment, we use Microsoft Azure as the provider.
I'd rate the solution eight out of ten.
View full review »NV
reviewer1069488
Lead of Technology Innovation at a construction company with 10,001+ employees
My advice to anybody who is considering this solution is to first do a proof of concept. See how it works, and see if you like it.
We were able to build our rules-based API engine, and it does exactly what we wanted it to.
I would rate this solution a ten out of ten.
View full review »DK
Devendra Kumar
Engineering Manger at a computer software company with 5,001-10,000 employees
I would rate the solution somewhere around 9 out of 10 because it is very good. The documentation and all that they have done is just splendid. On the documentation side, Camunda has done a really good job.
I would say that Camunda should actually focus on small cases as well. There's a lot of space out there, for small businesses. If they can, they should cater to them.
ZC
Zoran Cerkez
Owner/CEO at IT SPHERE
I would highly recommend the open-source version of Camunda, which can be used free of charge, for any software development company that would like to implement BPM in their software solutions. For software companies, it is a very good product.
You can have BPM in an engine and you can use external software solutions to create the UI, and you don't need to pay anything for licensing. This means that you can incorporate it fully, and use as much as you need. You can expand your software solutions if you want, without any license, which I think is great.
This is a good product but because it's open-source, it's always missing something.
I would rate this solution a seven out of ten.
View full review »PC
OpChOff877
Chief Operations Officer (COO) at a tech services company with 11-50 employees
For an internal project, this is a solution that you can install and have up and running quite quickly. As soon as you have a complex problem then you have limitations.
The processing engine is fine and is not an issue.
If I were rating this solution for internal use then I would give it a seven out of ten. On the other hand, if I were rating it for use by the public then I would rate it a three out of ten. With respect to security, there are a lot of question marks.
Overall, I would rate this solution a five out of ten.
View full review »BP
reviewer1403916
Principal at a tech services company with 1-10 employees
For anyone who is interested in using Camunda BPM, I would recommend reading the documentation.
The documentation is good and can be easily accessed online.
I am happy with Camunda BPM.
I would rate Camunda BPM an eight out of ten.
View full review »Compare this tool with BPM and Drools.
View full review »BL
reviewer969792
E-Commerce Business Partner at a tech vendor with 501-1,000 employees
I recommend this solution to others.
I rate Camunda Platform an eight out of ten.
View full review »HM
reviewer1595319
Founder at a tech vendor with 1-10 employees
I would rate it a seven out of 10 because the user interface lacks in some areas.
View full review »Buyer's Guide
Camunda
April 2024
Learn what your peers think about Camunda. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: April 2024.
768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.