We performed a comparison between Azure Site Recovery and Rubrik based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Disaster Recovery (DR) Software solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Azure Site Recovery helps to save costs."
"Site Recovery's most valuable features include its user-friendly console and the ease of migration."
"Azure Site Recovery's automated file synchronization was a game-changer in managing legacy systems."
"It is a very stable product and very scalable."
"Azure Site Recovery allows my company to save around 30 percent of the time on every VM that we need to back up and restore."
"The most valuable feature is the visibility of what is happening with our business as well as the good reporting and dashboards."
"The solution is very easy to use."
"What I love about Azure Site Recovery is its simplicity for basic configurations."
"I haven't encountered any bugs or glitches using the solution."
"It works with VMware and Hyper-V without agent installation."
"The most valuable feature is the archive to cloud location and the automation around the PowerShell script. There are also reports and dashboards."
"Features we have requested are typically added to the next product release."
"Rubrik can also serve as a secondary host for emergency recoveries."
"The security and the ransomware protection are most valuable."
"When it comes to saving time managing our backups, Rubrik has saved us a lot of time compared to what we were using. It feels like it has saved us lifetimes of time because the process used to be difficult. It's not just the day to time savings. When something goes wrong, that's where the real time savings comes into play. We are able to get back to where we need to be more confidently and with much fewer steps."
"Rubrik is stable and easy to use."
"The immutable backup could be better."
"The support team took a lot of time to respond and was not very professional."
"It would be good if we could replicate the solution to multiple locations simultaneously because we are currently allowed to replicate to just a single location."
"I would like to see more security features."
"The product's performance is an area of concern where improvements are required."
"Azure Site Recovery's deployment is complex. There are a lot of bugs, and it needs to improve stability."
"We need to be able to move the virtual servers and not build and then port them across. They need to improve the hypervisor."
"The tool should improve synchronization."
"It is a lot more expensive than other solutions, but you get what you pay for."
"Pricing is something that needs to be considered for improvement."
"It needs more storage array integration options and an easier restore for files that download using a browser."
"It is already very well furnished, but live mounts for Nutanix AHV would be amazing."
"They need to find a solution for SMBs. It is currently only suitable for enterprises or big customers. They need to find a solution that suits SMBs."
"I would like to have a built-in index searching ability of files/system files within the Rubrik interface to determine if a file or item exists, rather than just recovering it, and then doing a search for the file afterwards."
"There are some corner cases where the Rubrik Connector (Agent) still doesn't work for our clients."
"Could be improved from an analytics point of view."
Azure Site Recovery is ranked 1st in Disaster Recovery as a Service with 18 reviews while Rubrik is ranked 4th in Disaster Recovery (DR) Software with 82 reviews. Azure Site Recovery is rated 8.2, while Rubrik is rated 9.2. The top reviewer of Azure Site Recovery writes "Useful for restoration purposes that ensures that the users get to save a lot of time". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Rubrik writes "Easy to use with minimal training required, innovative, good support". Azure Site Recovery is most compared with Veeam Backup & Replication, VMware SRM, Zerto, AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery and IBM Disaster Recovery Services, whereas Rubrik is most compared with Veeam Backup & Replication, Cohesity DataProtect, Commvault Cloud, Zerto and Dell PowerProtect DD (Data Domain). See our Azure Site Recovery vs. Rubrik report.
See our list of best Disaster Recovery (DR) Software vendors.
We monitor all Disaster Recovery (DR) Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.