We performed a comparison between Check Point Remote Access VPN and TeamViewer based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Remote Access solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Access is browser-based only and requires no additional client installation."
"The biggest advantage of Check Point Remote Access VPN is that we already use the Check Point firewall. We only needed to enable the feature and do the configuration in order to enable the VPN feature. We didn't need to buy or manage new hardware. This was a big advantage."
"Organizations that already use the Check Point NGFW Solution do not require any additional hardware, which makes the implementation straightforward and reduces the time to go live."
"The security of the solution is a good feature, the stability is a valuable feature, and the customization is also a nice feature."
"Our users find the interface very comfortable to use."
"It is easy to install the Endpoint Remote Access VPN client on different platforms."
"The team has full visibility of the users that connect allowing them to keep control of who is in the network and what data they are allowing to come in and out."
"The tool is easy to configure and use. We integrated it with Active Directory to manage user authentication. It's intuitive and transparent, making it simple for users to use. It connects automatically to the VPN whenever users turn on the laptop. The product is efficient and offers centralized control."
"It's a user-friendly product."
"I don't know of any performance problems with TeamViewer - generally, it's a stable product."
"The most important feature of TeamViewer is its ease of use."
"The solution is a very good tool for monitoring and for remote access. Anyone is able to use it, it is simple to use."
"The quality of the call and the quality of the sharing have been excellent."
"The most valuable features of TeamViewer are the ability for administrators to lock the remote systems, simple connections, and easy login access."
"From my perspective, the most important is the login."
"Getting started with TeamViewer was easy, with a very straightforward usage"
"They need to increase their timeout. Right now, it will fail after ten seconds, however, it shouldn't fail until after 20 seconds."
"Improvements for Check Point Remote Access VPN could include enhancing mobile connectivity for a smoother user experience."
"The authentication that we handle is through a .p12 certificate, however, we have integrated it with a 2MFA service through another provider. Something that could improve Check Point is if it had its own 2MFA service through a blade or some sort of application."
"Bug Fixes and enhancement requests should be remediated earlier."
"We have noted some stability issues."
"I would like this service to be easier to manage when you integrate it with third parties."
"The provisioning of VPN users has room for improvement."
"Sometimes the application slows down the computing device, and this affects workflows."
"In the next release, I would prefer to have a voice integration and collaboration feature to support multiple teams simultaneously."
"Sometimes, the app can be a little cumbersome when accessing certain aspects of the program."
"We'd like to be able to work from mobile to desktop and vice versa. We'd like more mobility."
"TeamViewer is publicly available and anyone can use it. This is the reason that many organizations do not permit the use of this solution. It is not considered to be secure enough."
"I'm not sure if they provide good quality audio alongside screensharing."
"They could give more information about using certain kinds of applications for secure transactions, such as secure file transfers."
"We have a consultant that helps us do the virtual aspects of TeamViewer."
"It's not the program itself that's an issue, but there is a need for some better documentation on how to use the web portal Management Console. That seems to be a bit lacking in directions, if you aren't paying attention and you don't know what to do. Better documentation would make it a little bit easier to set things up in different groups and share groups between people."
More Check Point Remote Access VPN Pricing and Cost Advice →
Check Point Remote Access VPN is ranked 4th in Remote Access with 60 reviews while TeamViewer is ranked 1st in Remote Access with 84 reviews. Check Point Remote Access VPN is rated 8.8, while TeamViewer is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Check Point Remote Access VPN writes "Is easy to use and has a nice interface, but the scalability needs to improve". On the other hand, the top reviewer of TeamViewer writes "Solid cross-platform remote control, but with kludgy central management and some serious feature issues on macOS". Check Point Remote Access VPN is most compared with OpenVPN Access Server, Cisco AnyConnect Secure Mobility Client, Check Point Harmony Mobile, Fortinet FortiClient and Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks, whereas TeamViewer is most compared with TeamViewer Tensor, Microsoft Remote Desktop Services, Parallels Access, ISL Online and Zoom. See our Check Point Remote Access VPN vs. TeamViewer report.
See our list of best Remote Access vendors.
We monitor all Remote Access reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.