We performed a comparison between Comindware Tracker and Pega BPM based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Business Process Management (BPM) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."It was easy to set up my team with access credentials to their files."
"The configurable dashboard analytics and reporting capabilities ensure timely decision making."
"It provides a scalable solution that should allow me to grow my company without too much fuss or further set up required."
"The most valuable feature is that any non-technical personnel can easily work on the solution, redefining processes and creating drag and drop workflows according to the department or cross-department needs."
"This software added transparency to our workflows. It helped with increasing throughput of clients and their satisfaction."
"The ability to access Comindware Tracker from mobile has been greatly valuable to our organization. We are often out of office and this can create timeframe and task management issues. Being able to access tasks and time tracking while on the move is a great asset."
"This solution can be useful for tracking the different stages of projects and the people working on them."
"The feature I have found most valuable is the easy synchronization with other tools."
"The workflow designing and integration are the most valuable features. Also, the UI design was pretty easy."
"Application development is very rapid. A lot of code gets reused while building the applications, which is something we highly appreciate."
"It is easy to use, easy to understand, easy to implement and easy to enhance and we can do it as a Cloud. Also it is very user friendly."
"I have a lot of experience in this kind of industry, and Pega is one of the best solutions in terms of performance, capabilities, and the way we develop."
"The solution's most valuable feature is its quick setup. Nowhere else you can create a good-looking application this quick. It's a fairly robust system."
"The product helps you to build faster."
"The workflows are the most valuable features, particularly for us, because we were attempting to automate processes by utilizing workflows to provide a hands-off comparison between the bot and the human."
"It's a good tool for workflow automation."
"Figuring out how to integrate defined teams or groups into this system is difficult, and there are no contextual menus."
"This solution lacks API integration with some popular websites."
"I would like them to offer a one-time payment plan that one can choose."
"The OpenAPI is good, but it is not enough. It lacks out-of-box integrations with popular web services."
"I am expecting new updates to improve the software."
"If your organization has only a few team members then this tool is not suitable."
"The UX/UI could be reviewed and revamped to meet new the criteria of Digitalization and Innovation."
"The initial setup seemed a bit complex, and there is no great documentation."
"I think there is room for improvement in the low code/ no code environment that they're promoting now. That needs to be aligned a little bit more. I still feel that it is not that friendly for a person who has no experience with Pega to just go in and try to create something."
"One of the areas of this solution that could be improved would be to advance the low code features of the application itself. We would also like to use the same platform to build any application, even if it is not necessarily defined as a functionality needed by a BPM."
"The biggest thing I have seen is when going from one version to another and upgrading to the latest version, it takes a pretty long time for an organization to go through an upgrade process. I think that's an area where they can make it a little smoother."
"Its implementation in the public sector was a bit complex."
"I believe they simplify the application development. It is still complex. The learning is not easy, it takes time compared to other products on the market."
"If it could also be integrated with robotics, it could help with a lot of things, even if we don't have APIs, we could still talk to other applications. If it could invoke a bot, for example."
"It is not fully compatible with all versions of Internet Explorer, so sometimes, it does not work."
"We need more light retail BPM tools within the Pega system. However, Pega is mostly for big companies."
Earn 20 points
Comindware Tracker is ranked 46th in Business Process Management (BPM) while Pega BPM is ranked 3rd in Business Process Management (BPM) with 55 reviews. Comindware Tracker is rated 9.6, while Pega BPM is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Comindware Tracker writes "Easy to navigate and great for keeping everybody in the loop". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Pega BPM writes "Low code with great APIs and good flexibility". Comindware Tracker is most compared with , whereas Pega BPM is most compared with ServiceNow, Camunda, Appian, Microsoft Power Apps and IBM BPM. See our Comindware Tracker vs. Pega BPM report.
See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors and best Process Automation vendors.
We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
