We performed a comparison between DarwinBox and Oracle HCM Cloud based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Talent Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."In our company, we use DarwinBox to maintain the data of our employees and for recruitment purposes."
"The most valuable features of the solution are organogram and position-based mapping."
"The solution that we used previously was very complex. As a result, without referring to the manuals and consulting an expert, it was difficult for a newly hired employee to navigate the platform. However, this is not the case with Darwinbox. It has a very intuitive user interface, and anyone can use it and implement it without having to use a guide or a walk through process. It's very simple."
"The most valuable feature of Oracle HCM Cloud is the dashboards, customization, and configuration."
"We have not had any issues with the stability of this solution."
"The most valuable feature of Oracle HCM Cloud is its integration."
"All the features are good."
"It's highly stable because the system is totally managed by Oracle, Oracle provides 99.9% availability for the system uptime."
"This product can greatly improve handling of human resources and efficiency."
"The solution's scalability potential is very good. We have more than 1,000 users ourselves."
"The solution's most valuable features are all the human resources aspects and access management, as well as the talent review. The solution's talent management is very, very good."
"The solution's API integration with third-party applications should be improved."
"Like most software, it has a base version, the vanilla, out-of-the-box version, and customization is required to match it to the unique processes of each company. The Darwinbox team seems to be having difficulty with the customization process. They have to be a little more mature to customize it as per every company's need."
"DarwinBox is not a stable solution...DarwinBox is not a scalable solution."
"The absence management can use some improvement. Due to all the flexible working, the part with work schedules could be a little bit more flexible."
"In the next release, I would like to see a new recruitments module. I would like to see the preboarding so that it sends out integrations through personal email. That would be very useful."
"The recruitment aspect is good, but it's new and it still needs some enhancements. In the future, we hope it will be similar to Taleo."
"The interface could be more user friendly."
"There should be more digital assistance included, like chatbots."
"In some geographies, you might not find specific localizations. For example, here in Turkey, we can use all Oracle Cloud modules except for payroll. The Oracle payroll module isn't localized for the Turkish system. So, we need to integrate a separate, localized payroll solution with Oracle HCM."
"Oracle HCM Cloud could improve by adding AI and more offline capabilities."
"It's not so easy to customize as it's cloud-based."
DarwinBox is ranked 22nd in Talent Management with 3 reviews while Oracle HCM Cloud is ranked 3rd in Talent Management with 62 reviews. DarwinBox is rated 6.4, while Oracle HCM Cloud is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of DarwinBox writes "Has a very intuitive user interface and a fairly smooth implementation process". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Oracle HCM Cloud writes " Capable of consolidating data from all countries and providing access to any employee information across locations but poor user experience". DarwinBox is most compared with SAP SuccessFactors, ZingHR, PeopleStrong , Workday and Ramco HCM, whereas Oracle HCM Cloud is most compared with SAP SuccessFactors, PeopleSoft, Workday, SAP HCM and Oracle E-Business Suite. See our DarwinBox vs. Oracle HCM Cloud report.
See our list of best Talent Management vendors, best HR Analytics Software vendors, and best Talent Acquisition vendors.
We monitor all Talent Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.