We performed a comparison between IBM BPM and TIBCO iProcess Suite based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Business Process Management (BPM) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."We are implementing the tool to triple our monthly transaction volume."
"Responsive Portal + Process Federation Server. This set of solutions offers a unified worklist to our customers."
"It helps maintain, and in many instances, lower costs, as well as to maintain those costs, keeping them stable."
"We like that it does not require a lot of hours to train our people."
"We use the solution to develop and deliver products."
"It is transparent to business users because it is mostly picture based modelling."
"It is efficient in reducing costs."
"We have automated processes with IBM BPM and DocuSign. Its valuable features include low-code, timer, etc. It makes it simple to implement the products. We generate reports using the solution."
"It's very simple to use and the integration features between Java and other services within the workflow are very easy."
"We have been experiencing bad performance and instability."
"There is room for improvement in the stability."
"Finding errors and bugs on the system is not easy. We can't seem to use the events or logs to find them, so it makes it difficult to debug the system. They really need to work on their debugging features to make is much, much easier. It would improve the solution considerably and should be something they add in a future release."
"The front end is not customised for a good user experience."
"Needs better reporting. I do not think that we are fully taking advantage of what it already has yet."
"They could provide case studies to investigate and understand the functionality of business processes before development."
"It is a rather thick stack because you have to have WebSphere skills, IBM BPM skills, and an understanding of how the product runs on WebSphere. A lot of this will start to get a lot easier as they put it in containers, which will allow the platform to manage itself in some regards."
"It might not be suitable for entry level clients because it comes with a huge number of modules for processing that at times might not be necessary for upcoming clients."
"Our customers and developers have complained that the UI is a little bit confusing."
Earn 20 points
IBM BPM is ranked 5th in Business Process Management (BPM) with 105 reviews while TIBCO iProcess Suite is ranked 40th in Business Process Management (BPM). IBM BPM is rated 7.8, while TIBCO iProcess Suite is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of IBM BPM writes "Offers good case management and its integration with process design but there's a learning curve". On the other hand, the top reviewer of TIBCO iProcess Suite writes "An easy-to-use solution with great integration". IBM BPM is most compared with Camunda, Pega BPM, Appian, IBM Business Automation Workflow and Apache Airflow, whereas TIBCO iProcess Suite is most compared with Apache Airflow, TIBCO ActiveMatrix BPM, Camunda and Pega BPM. See our IBM BPM vs. TIBCO iProcess Suite report.
See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.
We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.