We performed a comparison between IBM MaaS360 and Ivanti Neurons for MDM based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Enterprise Mobility Management (EMM) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."It is a very stable and scalable cloud-only solution."
"It is very easy to use. It has a very easy interface."
"The most valuable includes managing everything from a single console."
"Mobile device management is most valuable."
"The ability to send configurations to our systems is valuable, particularly as we don't have a regular Windows AD server. Our current environment doesn't have a Windows AD, which limits our ability to push GPOs. However, this is where the solution can step in and help us push policies."
"The standout features of Intune are its excellent mobile device management and highly effective application management capabilities."
"The policy and compliance monitoring of devices and the software deployment are most valuable."
"It's not working perfectly, but Microsoft's Autopilot offers great visibility into automated deployment solutions."
"The best feature is the ability to control mobile phones, wipe and containerize the data, and keep employees' work data separate from personal data."
"Mobile Device Management, Secure Productivity Suite, and document management are valuable features."
"Maas360 uses distribution groups to deploy apps, which makes it a bit easier than, for example, Intune."
"The most valuable features of IBM MaaS360 are encryption and mobile design."
"Mobile Device Configuration with policy applying: This significantly reduces time of device configuration."
"It can change policies based on geolocation or schedules."
"The implementation phase of IBM MaaS360 was pretty easy."
"The product’s most valuable feature is email, browser, and application security."
"The user interface is user-friendly."
"The company provides great customer service."
"The most valuable features of MobileIron UEM are tunneling and enterprise integration."
"It's effective in what it is able to achieve and it's easy to use."
"The most valuable feature is that everything is in one place, which makes it easy to manage."
"There is room for improvement, particularly in terms of compatibility, extending beyond the well-known major brands."
"It would be good if, in addition to the minimal patching and compliance, we could also use Intune for application deployment. For instance, if a device is not patched, Intune should have the ability to push not only a Microsoft patch but also other patches, such as a browser patch."
"There is still a gap between SCCM and Intune, especially in the reporting, inventory, and software deployment areas."
"We would like to see support for Chrome and/or devices for Chromebooks."
"There is no catalog for mobile access management (MAM) security."
"Lacks the ability to deploy more ways of management, managing devices and processing the policies."
"It would be nice to have a location tracker for the mobile device management tool. I'm not sure if it exists but hasn't been configured or if it's missing, but we've been unable to utilize the location features."
"The reporting is subpar. That's the only issue we have with Intune. We use another solution for that purpose."
"Configuring policies is difficult in IBM MaaS360. It also needs to improve usability."
"Its integration with Microsoft Teams could be better."
"The user interface could definitely use some improvement."
"The reporting and alerting could be improved."
"We opted to go with Microsoft Intune because it just seemed to be a more mature and comprehensive enterprise solution, whereas IBM MaaS360 didn't seem to have the necessary breadth to manage all of our equipment. Along with laptops, I've had some BYODs. IBM MaaS360 just didn't seem as mature in our assessment."
"Zero day support is something they can work on. They can make it a little bit more user-friendly."
"The price could be lower."
"The product needs to improve tech support."
"The interface is complicated and not very easy to use."
"The integration between the MobileIron and Advanced Neurons isn't completely in sync, and we're still working on that."
"We would like the initial setup to be simpler."
"UI needs an upgrade, feels very outdated."
"MobileIron UEM could improve the monitoring of devices."
IBM MaaS360 is ranked 8th in Enterprise Mobility Management (EMM) with 34 reviews while Ivanti Neurons for MDM is ranked 5th in UEM (Unified Endpoint Management) with 5 reviews. IBM MaaS360 is rated 7.8, while Ivanti Neurons for MDM is rated 7.4. The top reviewer of IBM MaaS360 writes "It lets you separate work and personal data on mobile phones, but the interface is outdated and clunky". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Ivanti Neurons for MDM writes "Feature-rich, easy to use, and has responsive technical support". IBM MaaS360 is most compared with VMware Workspace ONE, Jamf Pro, SOTI MobiControl, IBM MobileFirst and Sophos Mobile, whereas Ivanti Neurons for MDM is most compared with VMware Workspace ONE, Jamf Pro, Ivanti Avalanche, ManageEngine Endpoint Central and Matrix42 Enterprise Mobility Management. See our IBM MaaS360 vs. Ivanti Neurons for MDM report.
We monitor all Enterprise Mobility Management (EMM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.