We performed a comparison between IBM MaaS360 and SAP Mobile Platform based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, JAMF, VMware and others in Enterprise Mobility Management (EMM)."The key benefit of Intune is its integration with the Microsoft ecosystem."
"Intune's most valuable features are the device, compliance, and configuration policies."
"It is a stable solution."
"It is helpful for managing devices anytime and any place without requiring dependency on the local networks."
"The solution appears to be stable and scalable."
"One of the standout features of Intune is its seamless accessibility to work data, eliminating the need to be tied to an office or a desktop."
"The most valuable feature of Microsoft Intune is having all our devices compliant with our policies."
"Intune's unified endpoint management platform is invaluable."
"The most valuable feature is the fact that we can find a lost device or shut the device down and wipe it is good for HIPAA."
"Remote enablement feature and access to internal resources on the VPN."
"The solution is quite stable."
"Mobile Device Management, Secure Productivity Suite, and document management are valuable features."
"The solution is easy to implement."
"The ability to send an iPad out to someone and have them auto-provision it when they are out in the field is fantastic. We don't have to have it all configured before we ship it. This is probably the biggest value add."
"It helped us reduce the number of support incidents by limiting users' access to device configurations."
"The graphic, friendly interface allowed us to start without almost any support from the manufacturer."
"Both platforms, the SAP Mobile Platform, and SAP, are highly valuable for our company because they facilitate integration, which can be expensive. It's very convenient to connect and create billing accounts through the SAP Mobile Platform."
"It's not that difficult to set up."
"Technical support is helpful."
"Two of the very fascinating features that make SAP Mobile Platform stand out from other platforms are its offline capability and integration capability."
"One valuable feature of SAP Mobile Platform is its enterprise-grade standard and maintained APIs, available out of the box for easy integration with various systems."
"The initial setup is not overly complex."
"Reporting could be improved. It needs to be more expensive and robust."
"Microsoft Intune fails a lot when it comes to device compliance."
"Intune's third-party patch management could be better. It should be easier for the average system admin to keep non-Microsoft applications updated."
"In terms of what can be improved, I am looking for better enhancements regarding Apple management, not only on the mobile device, but also on the laptop."
"An issue we have run into with Microsoft Endpoint Manager is that we cannot patch third-party products like Adobe and Chrome with it."
"Intune has some limitations when it comes to application updates for third-party applications. You can schedule an update, but when it's a package setup, you need to supercede and replace it each time."
"I would like to see micro VPN. I like the way that some of the other providers have done something similar where, as you open that app on an end-point device, it creates a micro VPN straight into your device, which is quite a nice little feature. Also, Microsoft Intune relies heavily on its fellow products in the suite. It would be nice if Microsoft Intune could stand on its own two feet."
"When somebody has a customized application or their own company's application, we cannot deploy that application."
"The look needs to be updated and it could be simpler to use."
"Zero day support is something they can work on. They can make it a little bit more user-friendly."
"We opted to go with Microsoft Intune because it just seemed to be a more mature and comprehensive enterprise solution, whereas IBM MaaS360 didn't seem to have the necessary breadth to manage all of our equipment. Along with laptops, I've had some BYODs. IBM MaaS360 just didn't seem as mature in our assessment."
"An area for improvement would be handshaking with Microsoft in terms of trying to get a DLP on Microsoft OS."
"The solution needs to offer live technical support. Right now, it's just a chat window and it's rather unhelpful."
"Sometimes IBM MaaS360 seems buggy...The solution's technical support team is sometimes slow to respond and not competent enough."
"The UI has room for improvement."
"The price could be lower."
"The toolkit to develop front end applications, especially native applications, is not that good."
"The licensing model is a bit dated."
"SAP has announced that they'll be ending the support on the SAP platform."
"If it was low code or no code it would be ideal."
"One drawback is that SAP Mobile Platform apps are only available through the browser, making offline capability more challenging to implement."
"The cost of the SAP Mobile Platform is high, and there is room for improvement in its pricing."
IBM MaaS360 is ranked 8th in Enterprise Mobility Management (EMM) with 34 reviews while SAP Mobile Platform is ranked 12th in Mobile Development Platforms with 7 reviews. IBM MaaS360 is rated 7.8, while SAP Mobile Platform is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of IBM MaaS360 writes "It lets you separate work and personal data on mobile phones, but the interface is outdated and clunky". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SAP Mobile Platform writes "Flexible, well-designed, and offers good scalability". IBM MaaS360 is most compared with VMware Workspace ONE, Jamf Pro, SOTI MobiControl, IBM MobileFirst and Cisco Meraki Systems Manager (MDM+EMM), whereas SAP Mobile Platform is most compared with Android SDK, OutSystems, Ionic, IBM MobileFirst and Appium.
We monitor all Enterprise Mobility Management (EMM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.