We performed a comparison between IBM Rational DOORS Next Generation and Jira based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Application Requirements Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."It's web-based, so you don't have anything to install."
"One of the most valuable features is how you can tailor the modules."
"The most valuable features are the versioning of requirements and the possibility to reuse them."
"IBM Rational DOORS Next Generation is easier to expand to build a backend with several servers, so you can also use it to scale up to several hundreds of users without major problems."
"As far as maintaining our requirements so that we can have copies of them, it's good. I can print it out if necessary."
"The tool's most valuable feature is displaying requirements in a tabular format. This means you can see everything laid out in columns and rows. It is more aesthetic compared to other tools. The traceability matrix helps to view things better. It comes with different linking rules."
"The "Link by Attribute" feature is useful for making links without needing to use the web interface manually."
"My company contacts the solution's technical support, and they are good and responsive."
"The initial setup isn't too complicated."
"I like seeing which tickets are open and what our response rate is. They have a lot of good metrics in their system to see what's going on."
"A very comprehensive product; easy to set up and is very user-friendly."
"A most valuable feature involves the ability to customize the entries and to update them quickly."
"The most valuable feature is working with sprints and having the ability to create sprints."
"Has a good dashboard with good tracking features."
"We can create multiple boards for the same product backlogs."
"It is very configurable, and we can do whatever we want. Jira dashboards are also good, and we use them extensively. We also use the tracking mechanism extensively."
"When you are not working on it every day it is not very intuitive."
"IBM Rational DOORS Next Generation is not a very user-friendly product."
"When you are in Jira or Confluence, you have some freedom in how you type in text. That's also a weakness of Confluence, however, as it opens the doors to sloppy work. In DOS Next Generation, the text is very rigorous, but it might be difficult for people who don't have the discipline. Having a way to quickly enter requirements could help. It might already be in there, but I don't know. I don't have enough experience with the tool yet."
"The only additional feature would be if it had dynamic linking to other MBSE tool sets or industry-leading tools."
"There is room for improvement in the APIs that they have exposed for integration."
"As a web tool, DNG can be difficult to use if the server is loaded or your network connection to it is saturated."
"Both the data storage and reporting for this solution need improvement."
"It offers a bad user experience and the usability is poor."
"Could offer an improved user experience."
"In Jira, say on the team, no matter the methodology, it doesn't matter what I'm practicing, if I am using the tool for a while and I've compiled some sort of history. If I want to change my workflow, say my team is today using to-do in progress done, and tomorrow, I decide I want to use to-do in review and done, and I apply that new workflow, I have just now effectively lost all of my histories in terms of reporting."
"Some of the customizations are definitely a little challenging."
"In Jira Cloud, integration with Excel is missing. Previously, I could import our Excel files into Jira, and I could also download a big Jira report in the Excel format, but now, it needs to be manipulated after that, which is not good. It looks like they've done that on purpose, but I don't understand the reason for it."
"The integration could be better in Jira."
"We'd like to use it with non-Agile projects in the future, however, right now, it is a very Agile-focused product."
"Improvements in Jira for the next release could include adding AI tools for dashboarding, making it easier to report insights, and enhancing business intelligence capabilities. It should also improve on-prem support. As far as I know, Jira's on-premise support is being discontinued. From last year onward, they stopped providing on-premise licenses and now only offer cloud support. This shift happened gradually, and I believe they now only offer cloud licenses."
"A lot of features, such as time tracking, are only available through the marketplace. If multiple users are working on a user story, we aren't able to pull out the reports. So, there are many things that they aren't offering. They are available only through the marketplace. That's not good for a product."
More IBM Rational DOORS Next Generation Pricing and Cost Advice →
IBM Rational DOORS Next Generation is ranked 4th in Application Requirements Management with 12 reviews while Jira is ranked 2nd in Application Requirements Management with 259 reviews. IBM Rational DOORS Next Generation is rated 7.8, while Jira is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of IBM Rational DOORS Next Generation writes "An industry-leading tool to demonstrate traceability between requirements, with valuable features for tailoring modules and managing several thousand requirements". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Jira writes "A great centralized tool that has a good agile framework and is useful for day-to-day planning, task management, and work log efficacy". IBM Rational DOORS Next Generation is most compared with IBM Rational DOORS, Jama Connect, Polarion Requirements, Helix ALM and PTC Integrity Requirements Connector, whereas Jira is most compared with Microsoft Azure DevOps, IBM Rational DOORS, OpenText ALM Octane, Rally Software and Polarion ALM. See our IBM Rational DOORS Next Generation vs. Jira report.
See our list of best Application Requirements Management vendors.
We monitor all Application Requirements Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.