We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
"Issue linking has enabled teams to trace issues."
"The most valuable features in Jira are the dashboard, reports, and boards that help us to control the advancement of the project."
"The most valuable feature is that it is somewhat flexible."
"This is our way of communicating with different teams. We are a global company. I am based in San Diego, for example. A lot of the BAs are based in Paris. The development team is based in Minsk. We absolutely need to be in constant communication and on the same page."
"The most valuable feature is project management."
"The solution is extremely stable."
"The solution offers up great transparency that makes it possible for everyone inside the departmental organization to see what's happening."
"The most valuable features of this solution are workflow and reporting."
"The solution is more of a streamlined Slack."
"The value is that monday.com provides us with an overall picture of how much work a teammate has."
"The global search is the solution's most valuable aspect."
"The initial setup is very easy."
"The solution can be customized for individual projects and quite easy to use."
"monday.com is easy to set up."
"The only thing that JIRA doesn't for us is release management in a way that I can create a list of versions easily."
"We would like to see the integration of a lite-version of Confluence, just to manage some of the templates and documents."
"It's also difficult to migrate through, things don't always tie-up. It's not easy to use."
"Jira has recently updated their UI, but more can be done to make it even better."
"When you first start to use the interface, it is confusing."
"A lot of the user interface could be updated."
"In general, although we use JIRA, we never really learned how to use it properly. The learning curve of the solution is high. It has a lot of power, and yet we don't understand its capabilities."
"We would like to see integration between Tempo and Jira."
"The solution has dashboards, however, you have a limited amount. You may only get ten when you need closer to 30. We often need to create many boards. For example, we might need one board per customer. If we have more than ten customers, we run out of boards available. I'm not sure if you can pay more in order to get more or if it's just a design limitation. It's unclear. In any case, they should be more generous."
"Sometimes allocating between team members via the communication tool can be difficult."
"The user admin module could be more accessible."
"Some of the automation is having some technical difficulties."
"In my initial exposure to the interface, I did not find it to be very user-friendly."
"They could offer more packages. There seems to be a gap in price between package offers. One has as much as a $30 difference."
"I don't feel that price is an issue."
"It is not too expensive. It is just comparative to other tools like Microsoft Teams."
"I am not sure if the client is using a commercial version. I think it is on a per-user basis, and it is around 15 Canadian dollars for a user, but I'm not sure. It also has a free version."
"As a company, we get a subsidized price, and it's lower than what's quoted on their website."
"We are using the enterprise license which is nice because it ensures that we always have the latest versions of Jira software."
"Its price is fine, but we would like it to be less expensive. We are paying on a yearly basis."
"We are a regional research and education institute. We're using the free license provided for educational institutes."
"One of my customers told me that they were receiving better pricing for a similar tool from Microsoft."
"I wasn't involved with the licensing, but I believe it's negotiable."
"The solution is quite inexpensive. For example, we pay $8,500 for 75 users. It's somewhere around $100 a user, approximately."
"The project manager would be responsible for any licensing fees. As an end-user, we just follow suit."
"Fees are paid monthly per user."
JIRA has multiple deployment options to provide the flexibility your organization needs.
Cloud is a fully hosted service for customers who want to iterate quickly and have us take care of managing the infrastructure.
For customers who need to run our applications behind their firewall, we have Server and Data Center options. Server delivers greater capacity for a larger user base and gives you more control, allowing you to remain compliant with your enterprise IT, security, IP and privacy policies. For our largest customers, Data Center provides all the capability of our Server option, along with high availability, instant scalability and performance at scale.
Atlassian also offers premium support and strategic services for enterprise customers. Technical Account Managers are cross-functional technical advisors providing proactive planning and strategic guidance across your organization. Premier Support goes above and beyond our standard offerings to give you account-wide support from a team of senior support engineers.
Perfectly scalable, fully customizable, and supported for thousands of users. From managing core processes to team management to project or task management, monday.com has got your back.
Jira is ranked 1st in Project Management Software with 103 reviews while monday.com is ranked 5th in Project Management Software with 6 reviews. Jira is rated 8.0, while monday.com is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Jira writes "Great for collaboration, very stable, and extracting data is straightforward". On the other hand, the top reviewer of monday.com writes "Nicely streamlined with good features and an easy setup". Jira is most compared with Microsoft Azure DevOps, Micro Focus ALM Octane, TFS, IBM Rational DOORS and Rally Software, whereas monday.com is most compared with Asana, Smartsheet, Trello, JIRA Portfolio and Microsoft Project. See our Jira vs. monday.com report.
We monitor all Project Management Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.