Compare M-Files vs. Oracle WebCenter
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros | |
"Using M-Files means anybody on the executive team to go in and immediately look at a dashboard and know the status of a contract." | "A great solution for storing and searching large volumes of documents with easy access." "Oracle integrates well with other products to cover Big Data." "It's a very scalable solution and the performance is pretty good. The scalability, in my opinion, is the biggest advantage." "You can move workloads in between sub-servers so that you don't overload a portion of the server." "Integration within the solution is very good." |
Cons | |
"The integration with other products needs to be improved." | "Does not seem to be totally compatible with Windows 10 as of our current version." "This solution needs to support translation into the Arabic language." "There are many document management systems that offer pretty much the same functionalities but at a lower price. The product as such is pretty good. However, the pricing is not comparable. They need to adjust their pricing to be more competitive on the market." "The speed of the backup should be enhanced." "The solution should be offered in Persian. Right now, our version is in English, and there's a bit of a language barrier between the users and the product." |
Pricing and Cost Advice | |
"They have an Optical Character Scanning module but we didn't buy it because it's ridiculously expensive." | "The price of this solution is considered to be high; however, when speaking with Oracle, it is possible to get discounts of up to sixty percent." |
 Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Enterprise Content Management solutions are best for your needs. 457,459 professionals have used our research since 2012. | |
Ranking  | |
Views 1,610 Comparisons 1,311 Reviews 1 Average Words per Review 786 Rating 8.0 | Views 3,033 Comparisons 2,402 Reviews 5 Average Words per Review 558 Rating 8.8 |
Popular Comparisons | |
 Compared 33% of the time.  Compared 16% of the time. Compared 11% of the time.  Compared 9% of the time. Compared 6% of the time. |  Compared 27% of the time. Compared 21% of the time. Compared 15% of the time. Compared 5% of the time. Compared 5% of the time. |
Also Known As | |
| WebCenter, FatWire | |
Learn | |
| M-Files | Oracle |
Overview | |
M-Files provides a next generation intelligent information management platform that improves business performance by helping people find and use information more effectively. Unlike traditional enterprise content management (ECM) systems or content services platforms, M-Files unifies systems, data and content across the organization without disturbing existing systems and processes or requiring data migration. M-Files breaks down silos by delivering an in-context experience for accessing and leveraging information that resides in any system and repository, including network folders, SharePoint, file sharing services, ECM systems, CRM, ERP and other business systems and repositories. Thousands of organizations in over 100 countries use M-Files for managing their business information and processes, including NBC Universal, Rovio and SAS. M-Files website | Oracle WebCenter is the center of engagement for business powering exceptional experiences for customers, partners, and employees. It connects people, processes, and information with the most complete portfolio of portal, content management, Web experience management, and collaboration technologies. |
Offer | |
Learn more about M-Files | Learn more about Oracle WebCenter |
Sample Customers | |
| Comcast, Rovio, OMV, Sagem, UNEP, Elekta, Caverion, SAS, HCP, Yokohama | Chhattisgarh Infotech and Biotech Promotion Society, Jagran Prakashan Ltd., Standard Forwarding LLC, United Automotive Electronic Systems Co. Ltd., INSO sistemi per le infrastrutture sociali S.p.A., Helsana Versicherungen AG, ArRiyadh Development Authority, John Lewis Partnership, Arqiva, SURUGADAI EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTE, Portuguese Official Agriculture and Fisheries |
Top Industries | |
Computer Software Company34% Comms Service Provider21% Construction Company8% Media Company5% | Pharma/Biotech Company25% Healthcare Company13% Marketing Services Firm13% Transportation Company13% Computer Software Company49% Insurance Company13% Comms Service Provider9% Government4% |
Company Size | |
No Data Available | Small Business21% Midsize Enterprise14% Large Enterprise64% |
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, IBM, Box and others in Enterprise Content Management. Updated: January 2021.
457,459 professionals have used our research since 2012.
M-Files is ranked 7th in Enterprise Content Management with 1 review while Oracle WebCenter is ranked 4th in Enterprise Content Management with 5 reviews. M-Files is rated 8.0, while Oracle WebCenter is rated 8.8. The top reviewer of M-Files writes "Good workflows, and it is easy to use with a dashboard that improves contract visibility". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Oracle WebCenter writes "Has the ability to move workloads in between sub-servers but the backups should be faster ". M-Files is most compared with SharePoint, OpenText Content Suite Platform, OpenText Documentum, Hyland OnBase and Microsoft OneDrive, whereas Oracle WebCenter is most compared with Oracle Content and Experience Cloud, SharePoint, WebLogic Suite, OpenText Documentum and OpenText Content Suite Platform.
See our list of best Enterprise Content Management vendors.
We monitor all Enterprise Content Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.