Most Helpful Review
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
It is a scalable solution. We have been able to manage larger scale projects easily using this solution.
It is easily adaptable. In addition, it is easily used on mobile applications.
We are able to know what we are doing, how much we have spent, how much time we've taken, and it tells us how much money is left for the project. It also tells us whether we are below or above our expenditures, whether we are below or above our budget.
The key things are managing interactions, resource allocation, resource-leveling (enterprise) and as a collaborative tool, because we use it across multiple projects at a time.
A single place for all our organisation's project records.
Deliverables List: Most useful to enable meaningful status reporting at an enterprise level.
SharePoint site integration
Projects do not take as long and meetings take less time, since you know the status of developments or tests.
It can be used online or as an application from anywhere.
You receive notifications if mentioned on a card.
It helped us to organize project information and assign tasks to team members properly.
It may be considered expensive.
In terms of tech support, it took a long time for them to resolve a ticket.
When a lot of users logged onto the site, it took a big toll on the service. Therefore, there is a scalability issue.
Work needs to be done on collaboration with SharePoint.
It has to be more user-friendly. For instance, there should be some assistance, like when you go to certain sites, people pop up and say, "Can we help you? What are you looking for?" It's not interactive enough.
EPM 2010 UI seems a bit dated now that 2016 is available.
Permission management needs improvement.
In the card area, you should not be able to modify so easily what is already written, as this can cause loss of information.
Users should be able to log their time against the tasks and visual reports should be available in Trello for time spent.
Pricing and Cost Advice
It has features that cannot be bought by other rivals, so cost does not matter.
The licensing was procured before my involvement.
I think they need more flexibility with licensing, because there are preconceived ideas that don't allow as much flexibility with the various licenses.
Information Not Available
out of 24 in Project Portfolio Management
Average Words per Review
out of 75 in Project Management Software
Average Words per Review
Compared 18% of the time.
Compared 12% of the time.
Compared 11% of the time.
Compared 39% of the time.
Compared 8% of the time.
Compared 7% of the time.
Also Known As
|MS Project Server|
|Microsoft Project Server 2013 is a flexible on-premises solution for project portfolio management (PPM) and everyday work. Team members, project participants, and business decision makers can get started, prioritize project portfolio investments and deliver the intended business value from virtually anywhere. Requires SharePoint 2013, sold separately.|
Trello is the visual collaboration tool that creates a shared perspective on any project. Trello’s boards, lists and cards enable you to organize and prioritize your personal and work life in a fun, flexible and rewarding way.
Learn more about Microsoft Project Server
Learn more about Trello
|Magnachip, Gwinnett County Schools, CLEAResult, Medbit Oy, Intelbras S.A., ETS, CORE Construction, Keller Foundations||Pixar, Google, PayPal, Kickstarter, National Geographic, Viewbox Holdings|