We performed a comparison between PeopleFluent Talent Management and SAP SuccessFactors based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about SAP, Workday, Oracle and others in Talent Management."This solution is extremely flexible and the automation capabilities are great."
"The most valuable feature of SAP SuccessFactors is analytics."
"It's a uniform user interface."
"The performance and goal management is good, and it has a fairly detailed employee central."
"SAP SuccessFactors is one of the most robust platforms in the world today. For a unique global company, they need a platform that is compliant, such as GDP compliant in Europe. The solution delivers high quality in their core HR IS system which is called Employee Central. The system is one of the strongest and sturdiest modules that are in existence in the world."
"Currently, we are using the performance and goals management functionality the most. It is connected with the enterprise solution, and it is seamless. It can be easily accessed because it is available via the net. It is readily available, provided you have an internet connection. Their technical support is also very good."
"It's very user-friendly."
"This solution has automatic linking and reporting features. Upgrades are hassle-free because you don't need to change everything from scratch, when compared to Meta4."
"I think it's perfect that every requirement has flexibility in how it is handled, and that there are several workarounds for any problem we are looking to solve. Each problem has multiple solutions, so it gives us a lot of flexibility in terms of processes."
"The integration capabilities could be improved."
"SAP SuccessFactors functionality doesn't meet the expectation of our end users. There are other solutions that have better functionality, such as Workday, which is one of the top applications. Additionally, the solution could be easier to use."
"Analytics could use some work."
"The stability could be a bit better."
"The data management part can be improved in terms of how you can manage data from the HR admin's or HR team's perspective. It has some limitations in the reporting part in terms of how you can update the data and fetch the data. SAP HCM comparatively has a lot of capabilities in terms of backup loads, data management, data changes, etc. You can do these things easily, which is not the case with SAP SuccessFactors. Data management should be simplified in SAP SuccessFactors in terms of accessing the data, reporting, and then manipulating the data."
"They should be more user friendly and give us more tools to make it more flexible."
"Overall, the documentation could be improved, and I think the learning management module needs to include more capabilities when it comes to matching an organization's particular learning approach."
"The process for long modules needs to be improved, because compared to how it's done with a competitor (Meta4), the competitor's process was simpler."
"We lack information regarding how to build a network."
More PeopleFluent Talent Management Pricing and Cost Advice →
Earn 20 points
PeopleFluent Talent Management is ranked 28th in Talent Management while SAP SuccessFactors is ranked 1st in Talent Management with 90 reviews. PeopleFluent Talent Management is rated 6.6, while SAP SuccessFactors is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of PeopleFluent Talent Management writes "A flexible solution with superb automation capabilities". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SAP SuccessFactors writes "Offers many useful modules and integrations, and helps companies adhere to best practices". PeopleFluent Talent Management is most compared with PeopleSoft, whereas SAP SuccessFactors is most compared with SAP HCM, Workday, Oracle HCM Cloud, PeopleSoft and UKG.
See our list of best Talent Management vendors.
We monitor all Talent Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.