SmartBear TestComplete vs. Worksoft Certify

SmartBear TestComplete is ranked 4th in Functional Testing Tools with 15 reviews vs Worksoft Certify which is ranked 6th in Functional Testing Tools with 11 reviews. The top reviewer of SmartBear TestComplete writes "Allows us to test both desktop and web applications". The top reviewer of Worksoft Certify writes "Offers the ability to interact with application objects, as well as execute logical, mathematical and text manipulations with parameter-driven action steps". SmartBear TestComplete is most compared with UFT (QTP), Ranorex and Selenium HQ. Worksoft Certify is most compared with UFT (QTP), Tricentis Tosca and Selenium HQ. See our SmartBear TestComplete vs. Worksoft Certify report.
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Most Helpful Review
Use Null Product? Share your opinion.
Find out what your peers are saying about SmartBear TestComplete vs. Worksoft Certify and others in Functional Testing Tools.
300,656 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Quotes From Members Comparing SmartBear TestComplete vs. Worksoft Certify

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
The database checkpoints detect problems which are difficult for a human resource to find.Customer service and technical support responsiveness are high. Everyone is very professional.Test items, project variables helps in managing automation suite and scheduling execution.Selenium integration.It's cross platform automation capabilities specially ranging across web, UNIX (via putty), and other systems.The ability to run a whole suite of tests automatically (which we did overnight).TestComplete fits almost perfectly with a large amount of stacks, such as Delphi, C#, Java and web applications.Runs in different remote machines. We have multiple versions of the software being tested.

Read more »

It's module based and it's giving functionality.

Read more »

Read more »

Cons
Name Mapping feature should be clearer. Whenever I use it, I do not really know what will work and what will not work.Stability issues occurred only when connecting to the SourceSafe. Sometimes, after getting the latest version, the tool hangs and it should be reopened in order to recover.Increased performance with less memory and CPU usage.Error handling features in the tool are a little limited.The code editor, though following eclipse-style, is still a work in progress and gives a very poorly formatted code once viewed via other editing tools.We were testing handheld barcode scanners running WindowsCE with many menus of warehouse functions, and our biggest problem was the timing between input and responses.TestComplete gives support to do requests to a SOAP web service but has no support to do HTTP requests on Restful services.Product is not stable enough and it crashes often.

Read more »

It is poor for a web based application.Reportings are not user-friendly.

Read more »

Read more »

Pricing and Cost Advice
The license price for a physical machine is cheap, and for virtual machine, it is very expensive.Our ROI is about $10,000 a year.TestComplete now have come up with three modules (Web, Desktop & Mobile), so based on the type of product for automation, it is adequate to purchase the required module.Buy modules on demand. If you have a four-person team and they will each automate tests only 25% of the time, it's better to buy a floating licence and share the tool during the work day.The price is less, compared to other products, such as QTP.My advice so far, is that while it’s not quite as powerful and easy to use as UFT, its price tag more than makes up for it.The product is becoming more and more expensive.

Read more »

The tool is not really good at all because you need to purchase some additional tools.

Read more »

Information Not Available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Functional Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.
300,656 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
Views
31,570
Comparisons
12,638
Reviews
15
Followers
1,251
Avg. Rating
7.8
Views
12,583
Comparisons
4,174
Reviews
11
Followers
877
Avg. Rating
8.7
Views
0
Comparisons
0
Reviews
1
Followers
1
Avg. Rating
5.0
Top Comparisons
Compared 22% of the time.
Compared 18% of the time.
See more SmartBear TestComplete competitors »
Compared 36% of the time.
Compared 22% of the time.
Compared 14% of the time.
See more Worksoft Certify competitors »
Website/Video
SmartBear Software
Worksoft
Null Vendor
Overview

TestComplete is a powerful and robust automated testing tool for mobileweb and desktop  applications. Quickly and easily create accurate and repeatable tests across multiple devices, platforms and environments – regardless of experience level. It supports multiple languages, modern control sets and integrates with open source frameworks and tools like Selenium, SoapUI and Jenkins.

Worksoft is a leading global provider of automation software for high-velocity business process testing and discovery. Enterprises worldwide use Worksoft intelligent automation to innovate faster, lower technology risk, reduce costs, improve quality, and deeply understand their real end-to-end business processes. Global 5000 companies across all industries choose Worksoft for high speed process discovery and functional testing of digital, web, cloud, mobile, big data, and dozens of enterprise applications, including SAP, Oracle, and Salesforce.com.
Information Not Available
OFFER
Learn more about SmartBear TestComplete
Learn more about Worksoft Certify
Learn more about Null Product
Sample Customers
Cisco, J.P. Morgan, Boeing, McAfee, EMC, Intuit, and Thomson Reuters.Kraft, Reliant Energy, Richemont, Applied Materials, Siemens PLM, Mosaic, Dow Corning, ebay, IBM, Accenture, Fortis BC, US Government, Southwest Airlines
Information Not Available
Top Industries
REVIEWERS
Retailer
13%
Comms Service Provider
13%
Manufacturing Company
13%
Software R&D Company
13%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Manufacturing Company
13%
Financial Services Firm
13%
Retailer
10%
Transportation Company
9%
REVIEWERS
Manufacturing Company
30%
University
10%
Consumer Goods
10%
Retailer
10%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Software R&D Company
24%
Manufacturing Company
12%
Marketing Services Firm
10%
Retailer
7%
No Data Available
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business
15%
Midsize Enterprise
37%
Large Enterprise
49%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business
15%
Midsize Enterprise
27%
Large Enterprise
58%
REVIEWERS
Midsize Enterprise
14%
Large Enterprise
86%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business
15%
Midsize Enterprise
6%
Large Enterprise
79%
No Data Available
Find out what your peers are saying about SmartBear TestComplete vs. Worksoft Certify and others in Functional Testing Tools.
Download now
300,656 professionals have used our research since 2012.
We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.

Sign Up with Email