I would rate the stability of this solution an eight, on a scale from one to 10, with one being the worst and 10 being the best.

Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention is a stable solution.

Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention is a stable solution.

I would rate the stability a seven out of ten. We occasionally experience some downtime and glitches, mainly on the cloud side.

I'd rate the stability six out of ten. It was okay. It could have been better. 

It is stable. My only requirement is to be able to invest further or maintain the hardware.

The solution is stable. It's been around for a while and has never needed a patch or hub fix. 

Forcepoint DLP is stable.

This solution is stable. There is no specific maintenance of Forcepoint DLP, it is just a matter of tweaking the product to comply with any new or amended corporate policies.

Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention is a stable product.

Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention is a stable product. We have had any serious issues on the client side. 

Stability-wise, I rate this solution an eight out of ten.

The system is stable, but as I mentioned, the reporting portion is very unstable. If I want to get reports out, it takes a long time. Sometimes the server is down, and I have to raise tickets. I have had problems there.

The product's stability is very good, and it is a major reason why it is considered a market leader.

I would rate the tool’s stability an eight out of ten. The product is stable.

The solution could be more stable. 

The solution is as stable as our internet connection.

The on-premises solution has high availability. The appliances that we've used are very stable. They just keep running. We have had very few issues with the appliances in terms of failure. In those situations, they were more on the hardware side. They just needed a reboot and that fixed things. Overall, the stability is good for on-premises. 

In terms of the cloud side, availability doesn't come into play as much because we don't change policies that often. We don't modify the policies on a day-to-day basis. We might modify a policy once a week or once every month, at the most. The client or endpoint really just needs to receive that update once, and it's pretty much good to go. So we're not relying too much on the cloud availability, except for that initial update for each endpoint. The cloud availability is going to be more relevant on the web side of the product, where you're going to want continual web access, filtering, et cetera.

I would rate it a nine out of ten.

I rate the solution's stability a seven out of ten. 

Forcepoint is very stable; I rate it a nine out of ten for stability. 

Initially, it takes a little bit of processing but nothing to be too concerned about. Stability-wise, nothing has really annoyed us. 

The solution is stable enough.

I think it's going to be hard to beat if they ever decide to replace it. Forcepoint is a pretty good product, we're all pleased with it.

I did not experience any crashes. The solution has been stable in my usage.

Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention is a stable solution.

I have worked with another DLP solution in and out, and I find that solution to be more stable than Forcepoint. Once you implement a policy in that solution, the policy will always function. You can be assured that the policy will be functional. With Forcepoint, I always need to check whether the policy is functional or not and whether my policy is getting synchronized on the detection server or not. There won't be any sort of end trigger if the policy synchronization was stopped. 

The stability is good. Issues are generally related to the agent. Whenever the agent is stable, the solution is stable. Whenever there are issues, it is common for them to be connected to the agent, making the solution unstable. Based on our experience, the stability has not been very good, but it has also not been bad.

The product is stable.

It's a stable product. I'd rate it eight out of ten. This is a highly reliable solution. We haven't had performance issues. 

It is very stable. There are no bugs or glitches. It doesn't crash or freeze. 

There are some improvements that can be made in stability.

I rate the stability of Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention an eight out of ten.

The stability is very good. 

It's stable. Forcepoint is a very old product.

Forcepoint is very stable. Symantec is also very stable.

It's a stable solution.

The product is very stable.  

This solution is one hundred percent stable.

After the configuration, it is very stable, and in the last two years, I haven't been faced with many issues or product-related challenges.

As for its stability, it is very stable.

This is a very stable solution. We don't have a lot of downtime, but when we do then we get proper support with no issue.

This product is very good. It's very stable.

It's reasonably stable. But for every solution there will always be challenges every now and then. Because of the high movement of data from one location to another things become challenging to the client. So it creates a false impression of instability.

We currently have 9,000 users.

The product is stable.

We have one person who is managing the IT for this and doing the maintenance.

It is a stable solution. 

The stability of the solution is very good. I'd rate it ten out of ten.

It's quite stable. Sometimes, when we do an upgrade, we get some trouble but otherwise, it's very stable.

This solution is stable.