RSA Archer Previous Solutions

IMRAN ALMARZOOQI
Team Lead: IT Security Compliance at a energy/utilities company with 10,001+ employees
We did not use another solution prior to choosing this one. Everything was done using Microsoft Excel. View full review »
VladimirSekerka
Security Specialist at a tech consulting company with 1-10 employees
A similar product that we used before RSA Archer was LDRPS (Living Disaster Recovery Planning System). We had to move from LDRPS to the RSA product because LDRPS went to the cloud. The security requirements of our management and of our customers are generally that they do not want to have very critical information on the cloud. In some cases, they can not have it there at all. We have to use a tool that is possible to install on-premises. When we were evaluating solutions, I was testing several of the products. I chose RSA Archer because it met this requirement and other needs we had for flexibility. I chose RSA Archer because I was tasked to find a tool that could implement business continuity planning. Archer can implement more processes in many ways, so it not difficult to implement anything from incident management to business continuity, to change management. Anything somebody asks me to do, they provide the requirements and it is really easy to implement it in this. On top of that, it is easy to customize. So this is the reason why we chose Archer. It is easy to implement, it is easy to change the workflow, and it is easy to customize the processes. View full review »
Find out what your peers are saying about MEGA HOPEX vs. RSA Archer and other solutions. Updated: May 2020.
418,116 professionals have used our research since 2012.