I have experience with Mikrotik and Cisco. Mikrotik is a really good product, but it is really complicated. You cannot use Mikrotik if you are not a trained technician. Compared to Mikrotik, Ubiquiti Wireless is easy to use.

For our company's target customers, which are small businesses, we prefer to provide Ubiquiti Wireless. My company does not currently use Mikrotik and Cisco.

We are running Cisco equipment mostly. From time to time, we run some of Ubiquiti's Wireless equipment as well. We've also worked with HP and Aruba.

The only difference is the life cycle of the product. They can be quite short, and that's a problem regarding maintenance and upgrading or expanding equipment and expanding installed solutions with similar equipment. 

I've worked with Cisco. Cisco products always have issues you need to patch, and it's an old brand. Cisco can do everything, but you'll need to spend lots of money educating your staff. Anyone who can use Linux can handle Ubiquiti. While Cisco solutions are powerful, you need a Cisco-certified expert, and these guys are very expensive. You need to hire them or train your staff. Either way, it costs you a lot of money For me, Ubiquiti is the product of choice because of the flexibility it provides us.

We have a mix of Ruckus Wireless, Ubiquiti Wireless, Jenkins Wireless, et cetera. We are also using Fortinet APS for Access Points.

We had a lot of issues with Fortinet regarding connectivity, stability, and everything. We tried to move to Ubiquiti, which was actually somewhat stable. We tried it out in our one building and when compared to Fortinet, it had a slightly higher advantage, however, still, we had issues with the penetration power.

We are planning to migrate more to Ruckus and Aruba.

I have experience with Cisco. I started to use Ubiquiti Wireless because of its web interface.

We previously used Tableau. However, we encountered challenges integrating various access points into the same networking environment.

We used HP Aruba, Ruckus, and Cisco before. We decided to opt for Ubiquiti Wireless as we signed a distribution agreement with Ubiquiti. Secondly, we found their product range to be extremely well-priced while maintaining high-quality standards.

I have used Aruba previously.

I used Aruba, Meraki, D-Link, and Cisco before Ubiquiti Wireless. We chose to switch from Cisco, Aruba, and Meraki to Ubiquiti Wireless mainly because most clients prefer cost-effective solutions. While brands like Aruba and Cisco are expensive. Ubiquiti is a US brand.

We do not use any other solutions at this time.

I have experience with Meraki.

We did have an experience with Linksys. However, it was not a good solution. 

We previously used an Apple Switch.

We've also used Cisco. When you go for wireless systems, typically you look at Cisco, however, it's expensive. If you can't afford Cisco, you might look instead at Ubiquiti or Netgear. 

I've also used Ruckus in the past. 

We have been using many solutions. We have used SonicPoint in the past and some Linksys options. We added Ubiquiti as we wanted the possibility to add on new devices within the same network and centralize all the devices under the same monitoring solution, under the same console.

We also have experience with Aruba and Meraki.

Since I started my company, I have been using Ubiquity.

We did not previously use anything else. When we started with these opportunities, we evaluated other products, and this had the best price and performance. So, we went with this from day one.

I have Ubiquiti Wireless, MikroTik Wireless, and MikroTik Wired.

The only brand we have considered for this particular purpose was Ubiquiti since all others are very expensive brands. For our use case, we cannot afford to implement expensive antennas as it's difficult to afford for purchasing,

At a previous job, I did work with Cisco. It's hard to compare the two. Cisco is simply on a different level. 

We used Cisco Meraki and Aruba in the past and switched to Ubiquiti because it has a better configuration.

I've only used this solution. I've never used, for example, Cisco or Aruba.

I have worked with Cisco Routers.

For testing, and learning purposes, I have been using CentOS, which is now Almal Linux or Rocky Linux.

I have also worked with Sophos and Bitdefender.

I have used Mikro Tik.

We have used Aruba wireless products as well, and they are better.

We've used many different solutions in the past and really like Ubiquiti. Our clients have used Fortinet and Meraki, however, those are best suited for larger enterprises. 

We used a number of different applications, specifically Cisco, in the prior years. We switched because of the cost and quality.

We use the solution alongside Linksys. We later migrated to UniFi in one of our offices.

I have been using Aruba solutions in the past and they have some advantages to this one. Aruba is more prudent and robust overall. However, in Aruba, you have to configure it a lot with many details.

We have used previously Cisco, IronNet, and Ruckus. I have found Ruckus to be the best.

We commonly use a couple of different products including those by Cisco and DrayTek. The choice of model depends on the size of the organization.

We use wireless products such as Cambium and Mikrotik.

We did use another solution before this product. It was cheap. However, it was a long time ago, and I can't recall the name of the solution. We switched due to the fact that we were looking to simplify the host management. This solution offered very simple management. That's why we're looking to switch from Juniper to Ubiquiti in our data center. We spend less time managing our hardware.  

However, at this point, we aren't able to buy the hardware we need in our country.

We use different models from Ubiquiti's suite of wireless products and we also use products by MikroTik. Ubiquiti was the first wireless solution that we used.